|
Prev: Avoid meat at least for one designated day a week- save the planet
Next: Dear Jonathan Ball, you were right, I was wrong
From: Mr.Smartypants on 2 Jul 2008 12:19 On Jul 2, 6:04 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...(a)thedismalscience.noot> wrote: > . I showed conclusively that I'm fuckwitted. and shrivelled penised.
From: dh on 3 Jul 2008 09:53 On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Goo wrote: >You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. I showed >conclusively that fuckwitted "vegans" see their bullshit "inefficiency" >argument against meat as something entirely separate from an >environmental argument Sometimes it is and sometimes it's not Goo, but they don't care about either one anyway. They are opposed to eating meat because they don't happen to like it, and that's all there is to it. They are opposed to it when it's good for the environment, good for wildlife, and more efficient than growing crops. They don't care!
From: dh on 3 Jul 2008 11:00
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Goo wrote: >dh wrote: > >> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Goo wrote: >> >>> You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. I showed >>> conclusively that fuckwitted "vegans" see their bullshit "inefficiency" >>> argument against meat as something entirely separate from an >>> environmental argument >> >> Sometimes it is and sometimes it's not > >It always is, Goo. No, you've got it wrong Goober. How humans farm always has an impact on the environment Goob, both when we consider it to be efficient and when we consider it to be inefficient. Really the efficiency factor comes down to being just a point of view, Goo. |