|
Prev: open letter to alt.support.depression.manic.moderated readers
Next: If the attacks continue, there is something to consider...
From: Cathy on 23 Jul 2007 19:54 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- a bunch of hooey. ] : : Kerrey's sudden interest in cryptologic arcana : likely stems from a recent addition to his staff: : policy aide Chris McLean. : : McLean is hardly a friend of the Net. While in : former Sen. Jim Exon's (D-Neb.) office, McLean : drafted the notorious Communications Decency : Act and went on to prompt Exon to derail : "Pro-CODE" pro-encryption legislation last fall. : Then, not long after McLean moved to his current : job, his new boss stood up on the Senate floor : and bashed Pro-CODE in favor of the White : House party line: "The President has put forward : a plan which in good faith attempts to balance : our nation's interests in commerce, security, and : law enforcement." Kerrey has since introduced a bill that parrots the Clinton administration's philosophy: * http://www.cdt.org/crypto/legis_105/mccain_kerrey/analysis.html * * Comparison: Major Features of the Administration and McCain-Kerrey Bills * * Administration Draft* * McCain-Kerrey** [w. section#] * Federal licensing of certificate * authorities(CA) and key recovery * agents * Yes. Yes. [401-404] * * Linkage of CA's and key recovery: * Encryption public key certificates only * issued to users of key recovery * Yes. Yes. [405] * * Export controls codified: 56-bit limit * on encryption exports, no judicial * review. * No. Yes. [301-308] * * Crime for use of encryption in * furtherance of a crime. * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 2.7.0 O0g067hDyhgO2IhYl0+XYATcFbmKoyDUANnu2GzMOH5uIAFhvE5yYtt45jdb9W3q mT5lW2qJVKrB4uMnVTU7oCbJCYD1zdCXpqnXLHbDmO4GdOrsIp30wWhPJEVojgJT uVE8Q1k2GCGABMGE7+Pvf/Ar+4eyt5yBQQzAuwG83hiarEo9DHOMyOloo11QcfJB hkHkq4zINzt5tzEvYP8uJPQ2/vfgDwapf4CL/yKFVOF0xxWchv79bE== =U4uD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: On the Road to Damascus on 25 Jul 2007 17:41
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:44:45 GMT, Eliza(a)alt.support.depression.manic.moderated wrote: H, This is indeed a serious TOS violation, and appears to me to be an attack on the other crossposted newsgroup. However, it probably is posted through a free news account, and the abuse will probably not continue for any length of time...so I recommend it be ignored... K |