low carb diets, not necessarily
in [Low-Carb]
|
Prev: High protein diet and low eGFR (estimated kidney function below 60)
Next: The Best Weight Loss and Nutritional Products worldwide
From: jcderkoeing on 5 Aug 2008 23:34 "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:20080805173929.763(a)gmail.com... > On 2008-08-05, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: >> >> "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:20080805121729.324(a)gmail.com... >>> On 2008-08-05, molecule12(a)gmail.com <molecule12(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Mostly short-grained white >>> Japanese >>> rice, with some genmai (Japanese brown rice) mixed in. >>> >> >> So why are you participating in a low carb newsgroup? > > This is a discussion group where everyone is entitled to his opinion, > provided it is on topic. > Rice is not low carb, and thus not on topic. That's why you're still fat. Because you're an idiot.
From: Kaz Kylheku on 6 Aug 2008 11:21 On 2008-08-06, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: > > "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:20080805173929.763(a)gmail.com... >> On 2008-08-05, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:20080805121729.324(a)gmail.com... >>>> On 2008-08-05, molecule12(a)gmail.com <molecule12(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Mostly short-grained white >>>> Japanese >>>> rice, with some genmai (Japanese brown rice) mixed in. >>>> >>> >>> So why are you participating in a low carb newsgroup? >> >> This is a discussion group where everyone is entitled to his opinion, >> provided it is on topic. >> > Rice is not low carb, and thus not on topic. Low carb diets may include some carbs. > That's why you're still fat. LOL! I've maintained a low body fat percentage for four years now. 6'1", 170-something pounds.
From: Susan on 6 Aug 2008 11:50 x-no-archive: yes Kaz Kylheku wrote: > > Low carb diets may include some carbs. Yes, but low carb dieters learn to eat for high nutrient density with low carb/calorie density where carbs are concerned. And to choose antioxidant, not pro oxidant sources of carbs. I eat boatloads of colorful, leafy, fibrous carbs by volume, but not by calorie %. If you compare the nutrients in 100gms of spinach to 100gms of rice of any kind, it's clear what a bad choice rice (or any starch) is. Susan
From: jcderkoeing on 6 Aug 2008 12:16 "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:20080806075702.155(a)kkylheku.gmail.com... > On 2008-08-06, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: >> >> "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:20080805173929.763(a)gmail.com... >>> On 2008-08-05, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:20080805121729.324(a)gmail.com... >>>>> On 2008-08-05, molecule12(a)gmail.com <molecule12(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Mostly short-grained white >>>>> Japanese >>>>> rice, with some genmai (Japanese brown rice) mixed in. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So why are you participating in a low carb newsgroup? >>> >>> This is a discussion group where everyone is entitled to his opinion, >>> provided it is on topic. >>> >> Rice is not low carb, and thus not on topic. > > Low carb diets may include some carbs. > Rice is not low carb, and rice is the bulk of your diet. You're in the wrong newsgroup. >> That's why you're still fat, between the ears. > > LOL! DOH!!
From: Kaz Kylheku on 6 Aug 2008 17:08
On 2008-08-06, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: > > "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:20080806075702.155(a)kkylheku.gmail.com... >> On 2008-08-06, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:20080805173929.763(a)gmail.com... >>>> On 2008-08-05, jcderkoeing <jcderkoenig(a)ibm.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Kaz Kylheku" <kkylheku(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:20080805121729.324(a)gmail.com... >>>>>> On 2008-08-05, molecule12(a)gmail.com <molecule12(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I eat rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Mostly short-grained white >>>>>> Japanese >>>>>> rice, with some genmai (Japanese brown rice) mixed in. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So why are you participating in a low carb newsgroup? >>>> >>>> This is a discussion group where everyone is entitled to his opinion, >>>> provided it is on topic. >>>> >>> Rice is not low carb, and thus not on topic. >> >> Low carb diets may include some carbs. >> > > Rice is not low carb, and rice is the bulk of your diet. The statement made in the right-hand clause of this sentence is not supported by any information I have given. It was therefore produced by something other than an intelligent, rational thought process. >>> That's why you're still fat, between the ears. From the quote marks, it appears as if I had quoted this line in my earlier followup, but in fact the original line that I quoted was different. >> LOL! DOH!! Similarly, this line is attributed to me by the quoting level, but I didn't write it. The original line reads only ``LOL!''. Editing the content of quoted material, other than for brevity (and with clear indications) is, to me, an unacceptable breach of Usenet etiquette. |