|
From: MCS on 1 Mar 2007 14:23 made rules where you can't sue polluters now look what is happening. Help > Please my family is having health problems and others too. Please help us > mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com > paid for by oil and car companies, and coal and absolutely no changes in > effects > We actually pay them to kill us faster > Philadelphia number 2 in respiratory deaths > Polluters getting away with murder legally with legislation where you > can't > sue polluters. >> probably the most commercials for asthma and copd and Lung centers also >> inthe country is in my city and not without reason. They know what most >> citizens of this state and NE don't know, they are human guinea pigs to >> polluters and there is nothing they can do to stop it. >> This is one of the biggest conspiracies of all time. I never ever >> thought >> america >> would be like this >> Cigarette companies knew of the damage >> Who will ever sue the car makers and coal makers and oil >> refineries? I want to be reasonable, but when more and more people are affected by particle pollution and have asthma, and a study says millions will become ill or affected by breathing it, how are you suppose to stay healthy by having to exercise in it. I lost the links which showed harm but there are other links to possible damage on the net. I myself am sure of the harm once levels reach moderate, so assuming the studies are correct who is responisble for protecting americans? Pharmacies and asthma drug makers know of damage they advertise >> for COPD and asthma and Lung Centers meds all day and night in this >> city, >> yet hardly any >> story why we need it? Hoho if you don't think news isn't controlled or >> coopted then I would say your naive >> In addition to advertising for effects from lung illness, The fact that >> our >> tv stations talk about health effects of one study on >> vitamin e or a car seat recall but ignore that we are number one or two >> in >> the nation for >> respiratory deaths, more asthma then most every city (Thats EVERY CITY in >> AMERICA), rated f by American Lung Association and bottom sixth percent >> in >> air quality from >> Sperlings list of cities , and now or >> soon almost more days then any city in the US for particulate pollution >> on >> airnow.org >> without getting good days of air .. shows me this is a conspiracy that >> goes >> unrivaled in modern history. Show me comparison studies, like people >> living >> on congested streets with lots of traffic and compare their health to >> people >> with no >> traffic in low pollution towns, or . Compare people who are bus drives >> who >> stay >> hours behind other bus drivers and rate their health to average american >> without this . Ten other studies could show damage, for instance a >> neighborhood with many fast food restaurants and cars idling , the >> effects >> of health on neighbors homeowners health... bordering the fast food >> restaurants. No one cares to protect people equally from real damage. I >> would like to see the number of people who ate the same things and got >> Cancers >> directly related to the differeing amounts of pollution in their >> neighborhood! Do you see the studies. >> The epa actually has a way to rate our air although i think they >> underestimate thedamage and the levels at which human health is >> compromised. >> I think human health begins to be compromised in Good air zone towards >> the >> mild zone. At Mild zone my lung automatically constrict. There were more >> then two studies that have mysteriously disappeared that showed >> exercising >> in this moderate level could quite likely do more harm then good.And >> millions of people are breathing air that is killing them faster then >> others >> but they don't seem to be found... anymore on the net. Is there a study >> that says its healthy and if not and kids are getting this air 80 percent >> of >> the time , is there a magical way they are protected from polluters? Of >> course not, they are being poisoned ! So when tv says to go out and >> exercise >> even if peoople might be harmed whose responsibility is it to protect >> people? When weather people say warning level pollution days are >> beautiful >> is there any responisbilityto tell the truth to viewers ? Why >> don'tprotecting our own people as important as paying oil companies >> subsidies for oil exploration? >> >> >> >> amazing, I feel the pain and its not my fault! >> Collectively if and I say IF they wanted to prove more lethal damage they >> could. I have written Universities to ask to show levels of health >> between >> two >> populations who ate the same thing but breathed big differences in >> particle >> pollution. They hung up on me. The literally don't care! Its amazing.Try >> asking news stations why they advertise for asthma meds but don't tell >> viewers the horrible rates in our town. >> >> in the meantime people will suffer knowingly or most hopeful to >>>> politicians, >>>> unknowingly >>>> I listed some things that we have that are horrible for a city, how can >>>> one not see how things are connected, yet people like to argue the air >>>> is >>>> not bad. >>> American Lung Association rates our city an F for air quality >>> >>>> Number one or two in asthma and asthma doctors, and death by asthmaHere >>>> are the most recent links , of cities with most asthma, >>> Here is the link to 2006 most asthma link >>> http://www.asthmacapital.com/asthma_capitals2006.pdf >>> >>> 2007 >>> http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=79126 >>> >>>> Number one or two the number of days our air reaches moderate levels >>>> the >>>> kind that one study says does more harm then good if you exercise in it >>>> and >>>> the kind which automatically constricts lungs and a host of other >>>> horrible >>>> things ( the fact that they even did the studies surprises me) >>>> F rating my American Lung Association >>>> The most depressed city in the nation >>> >>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1359647/posts >>> >>>> After adjusting for age distribution of the population, female >>>> mortality >>>> was 20 percent higher!!!! then average for the US and Male mortality >>>> was >>>> 33 >>>> percent higher then average! Is this healthy ? Or just a little bad? >>>> >>>> http://www.phila.gov/health/hp2010/P...emperature.pdf >>>> >>>> Bottom ten percent for air quality, in Sperlings list of cities. >>> Even low levels or particulates which we get more often then most every >>> city in the US causes elevated risks of stroke >>> Personally unlike some have said, I don't think the stats can get much >>> worse here >>> http://www.americanheart.org/present...tifier=3045419 >>> >>>>and a photo of my air filter after 29 days in air that had 18 moderate >>>>particulate days out of 29 or worse >> >> http://s135.photobucket.com/albums/q141/stevephotobucket/?action=view¤t=IMG_0118.jpg >> >> >>>> We have NJ doing things , mandating emission control and California is >>>> going to stop using coal near their cities and >>>> other towns get upset if they have three warning days, of air, here we >>>> ignore it. The news media totally ignores all these correlations. Now I >>>> ask you why? Kids I urge your parents to ask politicians how you or >>>> family is >>>> to stay healthy in air not conducive to exercise? Can anyone show me a >>>> link or magical way of doing that ? >>>> how its done? How do you accept the possibility that when all areas of >>>> the country health is improving , in Philly its actually amongst the >>>> worse in several areas? Is there a magic reason for this? or for this >>>> to >>>> be ignored? >>> >>>> here we are blasted with ads for asthma and lung centers and you would >>>> not >>>> believe that so many people still don't correlate our air being bad or >>>> the >>>> city having problems >>>> We have one of the worse violent crime rates in the US on ration basis >>>> and lowest percentage >>>> of kids graduating, but its me that is the problem? >>>> What world am I in? >>>> >>> Pa is number 2 in the country for asthma >>>> >>>>Oil Company Profits Continue to Skyrocket > > Big oil companies are swimming in a sea of record-breaking profits while > American consumers and taxpayers pay the price. In 2005, the world's > biggest > oil companies reported a combined $111 billion in profits. In the first > three quarters of 2006 they reported more than $94 billion. > > Some of the biggest oil company profits in 2005 were: > * ExxonMobil: $36.1 billion > * Royal Dutch Shell: $25.3 billion > * BP: $22.3 billion > * ConocoPhillips: $13.5 billion > * Chevron Texaco $14.1 billion > > Federal Handouts Lavish Billions on Oil and Gas Companies > > Despite earning record profits, oil and gas companies continue to benefit > from billions in handouts courtesy of American taxpayers. Between tax > incentives, below-market fees for drilling on public lands, research and > development subsidies and accounting gimmicks, these companies will > receive > more than $31.6 billion from the federal government over the next five > years. > > Specifically, these handouts break down as follows: > * Tax breaks: $16 billion > * Research and development subsidies: $1.8 billion > * Below-market fees for drilling on public lands: $9.5 billion > * Accounting gimmicks: $4.3 billion > * Total: $31.6 billion > > Some of most outrageous handouts to Big Oil allows companies drilling for > oil and natural gas on public lands to pay below-market fees, or > royalties, > for the resources they extract. Oil companies are currently slated to > shortchange taxpayers by $9.5 billion over the next five years. > > Another giveaway allows oil companies to write off the costs of oil > drilling > and refining. Together, these giveaways total more than $4 billion over > the > next 5 years. > > >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky(a)kaufman.net> wrote in message >> news:hc6Eh.816$BE2.107(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... >>> Neolibertarian wrote: >>>> >>>> Nobody /doesn't/ want clean air and less violence, Cochise. >>>> >>> Boy, oh boy - do I ever wish /that/ was true! >> >> >> "mcs" <mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:UH7Fh.15815$sv6.12361(a)trndny08... >>> no good air especially in areas with less then 30 percent of the time >>> having good air produces bad things if staticians and researches really >>> wanted to publish and tv producers wanted to tell you the consequences, >>> The people who live in these areas have huge disadvantages. This is the >>> biggest real conspiracy that is allowed to poison people and continue >>> of >>> all time. Bigger then cigarette conspiracy to hide damage >>> >> >> >>
From: MCS on 1 Mar 2007 22:44 First the violence link , in my city besides worse asthma and respiratory death rates and people dying 30 percent fast, we have murder 3 time average of major city. We are now called filthadelphia and murder capital http://www.cnn.com/video/partners/cl...urder.city.cnn "MCS" <mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:rKFFh.4020$aO6.382(a)trndny06... > made rules where you can't sue polluters now look what is happening. Help >> Please my family is having health problems and others too. Please help us >> mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com >> paid for by oil and car companies, and coal and absolutely no changes in >> effects >> We actually pay them to kill us faster >> Philadelphia number 2 in respiratory deaths >> Polluters getting away with murder legally with legislation where you >> can't >> sue polluters. >>> probably the most commercials for asthma and copd and Lung centers also >>> inthe country is in my city and not without reason. They know what most >>> citizens of this state and NE don't know, they are human guinea pigs to >>> polluters and there is nothing they can do to stop it. >>> This is one of the biggest conspiracies of all time. I never ever >>> thought >>> america >>> would be like this >>> Cigarette companies knew of the damage >>> Who will ever sue the car makers and coal makers and oil >>> refineries? > > I want to be reasonable, but when more and more people are affected by > particle pollution and have asthma, and a study says millions will become > ill or affected by breathing it, how are you suppose to stay healthy by > having to exercise in it. I lost the links which showed harm but there are > other links to possible damage on the net. I myself am sure of the harm > once > levels reach moderate, so assuming the studies are correct who is > responisble for protecting americans? > > > > > > Pharmacies and asthma drug makers know of damage they advertise >>> for COPD and asthma and Lung Centers meds all day and night in this >>> city, >>> yet hardly any >>> story why we need it? Hoho if you don't think news isn't controlled or >>> coopted then I would say your naive >>> In addition to advertising for effects from lung illness, The fact that >>> our >>> tv stations talk about health effects of one study on >>> vitamin e or a car seat recall but ignore that we are number one or two >>> in >>> the nation for >>> respiratory deaths, more asthma then most every city (Thats EVERY CITY >>> in >>> AMERICA), rated f by American Lung Association and bottom sixth percent >>> in >>> air quality from >>> Sperlings list of cities , and now or >>> soon almost more days then any city in the US for particulate pollution >>> on >>> airnow.org >>> without getting good days of air .. shows me this is a conspiracy that >>> goes >>> unrivaled in modern history. Show me comparison studies, like people >>> living >>> on congested streets with lots of traffic and compare their health to >>> people >>> with no >>> traffic in low pollution towns, or . Compare people who are bus drives >>> who >>> stay >>> hours behind other bus drivers and rate their health to average american >>> without this . Ten other studies could show damage, for instance a >>> neighborhood with many fast food restaurants and cars idling , the >>> effects >>> of health on neighbors homeowners health... bordering the fast food >>> restaurants. No one cares to protect people equally from real damage. I >>> would like to see the number of people who ate the same things and got >>> Cancers >>> directly related to the differeing amounts of pollution in their >>> neighborhood! Do you see the studies. >>> The epa actually has a way to rate our air although i think they >>> underestimate thedamage and the levels at which human health is >>> compromised. >>> I think human health begins to be compromised in Good air zone towards >>> the >>> mild zone. At Mild zone my lung automatically constrict. There were more >>> then two studies that have mysteriously disappeared that showed >>> exercising >>> in this moderate level could quite likely do more harm then good.And >>> millions of people are breathing air that is killing them faster then >>> others >>> but they don't seem to be found... anymore on the net. Is there a study >>> that says its healthy and if not and kids are getting this air 80 >>> percent >>> of >>> the time , is there a magical way they are protected from polluters? Of >>> course not, they are being poisoned ! So when tv says to go out and >>> exercise >>> even if peoople might be harmed whose responsibility is it to protect >>> people? When weather people say warning level pollution days are >>> beautiful >>> is there any responisbilityto tell the truth to viewers ? Why >>> don'tprotecting our own people as important as paying oil companies >>> subsidies for oil exploration? >>> >>> >>> >>> amazing, I feel the pain and its not my fault! >>> Collectively if and I say IF they wanted to prove more lethal damage >>> they >>> could. I have written Universities to ask to show levels of health >>> between >>> two >>> populations who ate the same thing but breathed big differences in >>> particle >>> pollution. They hung up on me. The literally don't care! Its amazing.Try >>> asking news stations why they advertise for asthma meds but don't tell >>> viewers the horrible rates in our town. >>> >>> in the meantime people will suffer knowingly or most hopeful to >>>>> politicians, >>>>> unknowingly >>>>> I listed some things that we have that are horrible for a city, how >>>>> can >>>>> one not see how things are connected, yet people like to argue the air >>>>> is >>>>> not bad. >>>> American Lung Association rates our city an F for air quality >>>> >>>>> Number one or two in asthma and asthma doctors, and death by >>>>> asthmaHere >>>>> are the most recent links , of cities with most asthma, >>>> Here is the link to 2006 most asthma link >>>> http://www.asthmacapital.com/asthma_capitals2006.pdf >>>> >>>> 2007 >>>> http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=79126 >>>> >>>>> Number one or two the number of days our air reaches moderate levels >>>>> the >>>>> kind that one study says does more harm then good if you exercise in >>>>> it >>>>> and >>>>> the kind which automatically constricts lungs and a host of other >>>>> horrible >>>>> things ( the fact that they even did the studies surprises me) >>>>> F rating my American Lung Association >>>>> The most depressed city in the nation >>>> >>>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1359647/posts >>>> >>>>> After adjusting for age distribution of the population, female >>>>> mortality >>>>> was 20 percent higher!!!! then average for the US and Male mortality >>>>> was >>>>> 33 >>>>> percent higher then average! Is this healthy ? Or just a little bad? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.phila.gov/health/hp2010/P...emperature.pdf >>>>> >>>>> Bottom ten percent for air quality, in Sperlings list of cities. >>>> Even low levels or particulates which we get more often then most every >>>> city in the US causes elevated risks of stroke >>>> Personally unlike some have said, I don't think the stats can get much >>>> worse here >>>> http://www.americanheart.org/present...tifier=3045419 >>>> >>>>>and a photo of my air filter after 29 days in air that had 18 moderate >>>>>particulate days out of 29 or worse >>> >>> http://s135.photobucket.com/albums/q141/stevephotobucket/?action=view¤t=IMG_0118.jpg >>> >>> >>>>> We have NJ doing things , mandating emission control and California is >>>>> going to stop using coal near their cities and >>>>> other towns get upset if they have three warning days, of air, here we >>>>> ignore it. The news media totally ignores all these correlations. Now >>>>> I >>>>> ask you why? Kids I urge your parents to ask politicians how you or >>>>> family is >>>>> to stay healthy in air not conducive to exercise? Can anyone show me a >>>>> link or magical way of doing that ? >>>>> how its done? How do you accept the possibility that when all areas of >>>>> the country health is improving , in Philly its actually amongst the >>>>> worse in several areas? Is there a magic reason for this? or for this >>>>> to >>>>> be ignored? >>>> >>>>> here we are blasted with ads for asthma and lung centers and you would >>>>> not >>>>> believe that so many people still don't correlate our air being bad or >>>>> the >>>>> city having problems >>>>> We have one of the worse violent crime rates in the US on ration basis >>>>> and lowest percentage >>>>> of kids graduating, but its me that is the problem? >>>>> What world am I in? >>>>> >>>> Pa is number 2 in the country for asthma >>>>> >>>>>Oil Company Profits Continue to Skyrocket >> >> Big oil companies are swimming in a sea of record-breaking profits while >> American consumers and taxpayers pay the price. In 2005, the world's >> biggest >> oil companies reported a combined $111 billion in profits. In the first >> three quarters of 2006 they reported more than $94 billion. >> >> Some of the biggest oil company profits in 2005 were: >> * ExxonMobil: $36.1 billion >> * Royal Dutch Shell: $25.3 billion >> * BP: $22.3 billion >> * ConocoPhillips: $13.5 billion >> * Chevron Texaco $14.1 billion >> >> Federal Handouts Lavish Billions on Oil and Gas Companies >> >> Despite earning record profits, oil and gas companies continue to benefit >> from billions in handouts courtesy of American taxpayers. Between tax >> incentives, below-market fees for drilling on public lands, research and >> development subsidies and accounting gimmicks, these companies will >> receive >> more than $31.6 billion from the federal government over the next five >> years. >> >> Specifically, these handouts break down as follows: >> * Tax breaks: $16 billion >> * Research and development subsidies: $1.8 billion >> * Below-market fees for drilling on public lands: $9.5 billion >> * Accounting gimmicks: $4.3 billion >> * Total: $31.6 billion >> >> Some of most outrageous handouts to Big Oil allows companies drilling for >> oil and natural gas on public lands to pay below-market fees, or >> royalties, >> for the resources they extract. Oil companies are currently slated to >> shortchange taxpayers by $9.5 billion over the next five years. >> >> Another giveaway allows oil companies to write off the costs of oil >> drilling >> and refining. Together, these giveaways total more than $4 billion over >> the >> next 5 years. >> >> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky(a)kaufman.net> wrote in message >>> news:hc6Eh.816$BE2.107(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... >>>> Neolibertarian wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Nobody /doesn't/ want clean air and less violence, Cochise. >>>>> >>>> Boy, oh boy - do I ever wish /that/ was true! >>> >>> >>> "mcs" <mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:UH7Fh.15815$sv6.12361(a)trndny08... >>>> no good air especially in areas with less then 30 percent of the time >>>> having good air produces bad things if staticians and researches >>>> really >>>> wanted to publish and tv producers wanted to tell you the consequences, >>>> The people who live in these areas have huge disadvantages. This is the >>>> biggest real conspiracy that is allowed to poison people and continue >>>> of >>>> all time. Bigger then cigarette conspiracy to hide damage >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > >
From: Doug Laidlaw on 5 Mar 2007 21:28 MCS wrote: > First the violence link , in my city besides worse asthma and respiratory > death rates and people dying 30 percent fast, we have murder 3 time > average of major city. We are now called filthadelphia and murder capital > http://www.cnn.com/video/partners/cl...urder.city.cnn > > > "MCS" <mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:rKFFh.4020$aO6.382(a)trndny06... >> made rules where you can't sue polluters now look what is happening. Help >>> Please my family is having health problems and others too. Please help >>> us mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com >>> paid for by oil and car companies, and coal and absolutely no changes in >>> effects >>> We actually pay them to kill us faster >>> Philadelphia number 2 in respiratory deaths >>> Polluters getting away with murder legally with legislation where you >>> can't >>> sue polluters. >>>> probably the most commercials for asthma and copd and Lung centers also >>>> inthe country is in my city and not without reason. They know what most >>>> citizens of this state and NE don't know, they are human guinea pigs to >>>> polluters and there is nothing they can do to stop it. >>>> This is one of the biggest conspiracies of all time. I never ever >>>> thought >>>> america >>>> would be like this >>>> Cigarette companies knew of the damage >>>> Who will ever sue the car makers and coal makers and oil >>>> refineries? >> >> I want to be reasonable, but when more and more people are affected by >> particle pollution and have asthma, and a study says millions will become >> ill or affected by breathing it, how are you suppose to stay healthy by >> having to exercise in it. I lost the links which showed harm but there >> are other links to possible damage on the net. I myself am sure of the >> harm once >> levels reach moderate, so assuming the studies are correct who is >> responisble for protecting americans? >> >> >> >> >> >> Pharmacies and asthma drug makers know of damage they advertise >>>> for COPD and asthma and Lung Centers meds all day and night in this >>>> city, >>>> yet hardly any >>>> story why we need it? Hoho if you don't think news isn't controlled or >>>> coopted then I would say your naive >>>> In addition to advertising for effects from lung illness, The fact that >>>> our >>>> tv stations talk about health effects of one study on >>>> vitamin e or a car seat recall but ignore that we are number one or >>>> two in >>>> the nation for >>>> respiratory deaths, more asthma then most every city (Thats EVERY CITY >>>> in >>>> AMERICA), rated f by American Lung Association and bottom sixth percent >>>> in >>>> air quality from >>>> Sperlings list of cities , and now or >>>> soon almost more days then any city in the US for particulate pollution >>>> on >>>> airnow.org >>>> without getting good days of air .. shows me this is a conspiracy that >>>> goes >>>> unrivaled in modern history. Show me comparison studies, like people >>>> living >>>> on congested streets with lots of traffic and compare their health to >>>> people >>>> with no >>>> traffic in low pollution towns, or . Compare people who are bus drives >>>> who >>>> stay >>>> hours behind other bus drivers and rate their health to average >>>> american without this . Ten other studies could show damage, for >>>> instance a neighborhood with many fast food restaurants and cars idling >>>> , the effects >>>> of health on neighbors homeowners health... bordering the fast food >>>> restaurants. No one cares to protect people equally from real damage. >>>> I would like to see the number of people who ate the same things and >>>> got Cancers >>>> directly related to the differeing amounts of pollution in their >>>> neighborhood! Do you see the studies. >>>> The epa actually has a way to rate our air although i think they >>>> underestimate thedamage and the levels at which human health is >>>> compromised. >>>> I think human health begins to be compromised in Good air zone towards >>>> the >>>> mild zone. At Mild zone my lung automatically constrict. There were >>>> more then two studies that have mysteriously disappeared that showed >>>> exercising >>>> in this moderate level could quite likely do more harm then good.And >>>> millions of people are breathing air that is killing them faster then >>>> others >>>> but they don't seem to be found... anymore on the net. Is there a >>>> study that says its healthy and if not and kids are getting this air 80 >>>> percent >>>> of >>>> the time , is there a magical way they are protected from polluters? Of >>>> course not, they are being poisoned ! So when tv says to go out and >>>> exercise >>>> even if peoople might be harmed whose responsibility is it to protect >>>> people? When weather people say warning level pollution days are >>>> beautiful >>>> is there any responisbilityto tell the truth to viewers ? Why >>>> don'tprotecting our own people as important as paying oil companies >>>> subsidies for oil exploration? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> amazing, I feel the pain and its not my fault! >>>> Collectively if and I say IF they wanted to prove more lethal damage >>>> they >>>> could. I have written Universities to ask to show levels of health >>>> between >>>> two >>>> populations who ate the same thing but breathed big differences in >>>> particle >>>> pollution. They hung up on me. The literally don't care! Its >>>> amazing.Try asking news stations why they advertise for asthma meds but >>>> don't tell viewers the horrible rates in our town. >>>> >>>> in the meantime people will suffer knowingly or most hopeful to >>>>>> politicians, >>>>>> unknowingly >>>>>> I listed some things that we have that are horrible for a city, how >>>>>> can >>>>>> one not see how things are connected, yet people like to argue the >>>>>> air is >>>>>> not bad. >>>>> American Lung Association rates our city an F for air quality >>>>> >>>>>> Number one or two in asthma and asthma doctors, and death by >>>>>> asthmaHere >>>>>> are the most recent links , of cities with most asthma, >>>>> Here is the link to 2006 most asthma link >>>>> http://www.asthmacapital.com/asthma_capitals2006.pdf >>>>> >>>>> 2007 >>>>> http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=79126 >>>>> >>>>>> Number one or two the number of days our air reaches moderate levels >>>>>> the >>>>>> kind that one study says does more harm then good if you exercise in >>>>>> it >>>>>> and >>>>>> the kind which automatically constricts lungs and a host of other >>>>>> horrible >>>>>> things ( the fact that they even did the studies surprises me) >>>>>> F rating my American Lung Association >>>>>> The most depressed city in the nation >>>>> >>>>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1359647/posts >>>>> >>>>>> After adjusting for age distribution of the population, female >>>>>> mortality >>>>>> was 20 percent higher!!!! then average for the US and Male mortality >>>>>> was >>>>>> 33 >>>>>> percent higher then average! Is this healthy ? Or just a little bad? >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.phila.gov/health/hp2010/P...emperature.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> Bottom ten percent for air quality, in Sperlings list of cities. >>>>> Even low levels or particulates which we get more often then most >>>>> every city in the US causes elevated risks of stroke >>>>> Personally unlike some have said, I don't think the stats can get much >>>>> worse here >>>>> http://www.americanheart.org/present...tifier=3045419 >>>>> >>>>>>and a photo of my air filter after 29 days in air that had 18 moderate >>>>>>particulate days out of 29 or worse >>>> >>>> http://s135.photobucket.com/albums/q141/stevephotobucket/?action=view¤t=IMG_0118.jpg >>>> >>>> >>>>>> We have NJ doing things , mandating emission control and California >>>>>> is going to stop using coal near their cities and >>>>>> other towns get upset if they have three warning days, of air, here >>>>>> we ignore it. The news media totally ignores all these correlations. >>>>>> Now I >>>>>> ask you why? Kids I urge your parents to ask politicians how you or >>>>>> family is >>>>>> to stay healthy in air not conducive to exercise? Can anyone show me >>>>>> a link or magical way of doing that ? >>>>>> how its done? How do you accept the possibility that when all areas >>>>>> of the country health is improving , in Philly its actually amongst >>>>>> the worse in several areas? Is there a magic reason for this? or for >>>>>> this to >>>>>> be ignored? >>>>> >>>>>> here we are blasted with ads for asthma and lung centers and you >>>>>> would not >>>>>> believe that so many people still don't correlate our air being bad >>>>>> or the >>>>>> city having problems >>>>>> We have one of the worse violent crime rates in the US on ration >>>>>> basis and lowest percentage >>>>>> of kids graduating, but its me that is the problem? >>>>>> What world am I in? >>>>>> >>>>> Pa is number 2 in the country for asthma >>>>>> >>>>>>Oil Company Profits Continue to Skyrocket >>> >>> Big oil companies are swimming in a sea of record-breaking profits while >>> American consumers and taxpayers pay the price. In 2005, the world's >>> biggest >>> oil companies reported a combined $111 billion in profits. In the first >>> three quarters of 2006 they reported more than $94 billion. >>> >>> Some of the biggest oil company profits in 2005 were: >>> * ExxonMobil: $36.1 billion >>> * Royal Dutch Shell: $25.3 billion >>> * BP: $22.3 billion >>> * ConocoPhillips: $13.5 billion >>> * Chevron Texaco $14.1 billion >>> >>> Federal Handouts Lavish Billions on Oil and Gas Companies >>> >>> Despite earning record profits, oil and gas companies continue to >>> benefit from billions in handouts courtesy of American taxpayers. >>> Between tax incentives, below-market fees for drilling on public lands, >>> research and development subsidies and accounting gimmicks, these >>> companies will receive >>> more than $31.6 billion from the federal government over the next five >>> years. >>> >>> Specifically, these handouts break down as follows: >>> * Tax breaks: $16 billion >>> * Research and development subsidies: $1.8 billion >>> * Below-market fees for drilling on public lands: $9.5 billion >>> * Accounting gimmicks: $4.3 billion >>> * Total: $31.6 billion >>> >>> Some of most outrageous handouts to Big Oil allows companies drilling >>> for oil and natural gas on public lands to pay below-market fees, or >>> royalties, >>> for the resources they extract. Oil companies are currently slated to >>> shortchange taxpayers by $9.5 billion over the next five years. >>> >>> Another giveaway allows oil companies to write off the costs of oil >>> drilling >>> and refining. Together, these giveaways total more than $4 billion over >>> the >>> next 5 years. >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Sanders Kaufman" <bucky(a)kaufman.net> wrote in message >>>> news:hc6Eh.816$BE2.107(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... >>>>> Neolibertarian wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Nobody /doesn't/ want clean air and less violence, Cochise. >>>>>> >>>>> Boy, oh boy - do I ever wish /that/ was true! >>>> >>>> >>>> "mcs" <mcsantpollution(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:UH7Fh.15815$sv6.12361(a)trndny08... >>>>> no good air especially in areas with less then 30 percent of the time >>>>> having good air produces bad things if staticians and researches >>>>> really >>>>> wanted to publish and tv producers wanted to tell you the >>>>> consequences, The people who live in these areas have huge >>>>> disadvantages. This is the biggest real conspiracy that is allowed to >>>>> poison people and continue of >>>>> all time. Bigger then cigarette conspiracy to hide damage >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> Plainly one for my list of newsgroup polluters. What is a "statician"? Doug. -- Be wisely worldly, be not worldly wise. - Francis Quarles.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Anxiety Research Next: Pollution and its affects on life are REAL |