From: Rupert on
Okay, Lesley, well it looks interesting, I've never heard of the
quaternionic Madelung transformation before but there's certainly
plenty of discussion of it in the literature, as Google quickly
confirms.

So, at the end, he writes

"Can we translate Newton dynamics for geophysical processes into a
general relativistic expression?
What are the new predictions from this new expression? Can we find an
experimental test supporting this prediction?
With regard to the condensed-matter analogue of general relativity
(Volovik et al.), does it mean that we can consider geophysical
processes like Earth's as composed of condensed-matter
superconductivity?
If yes, then what are the implications of this superconductivity model
of Earth? Can we find experimental support for these implications?"

Well, those are excellent questions, aren't they? I certainly hope
that someone investigates them. :)

He's certainly not questioning general relativity. Are you sure this
is the Electric Universe model?

Not a hollow-earth model, as far as I can tell.
From: Rupert on
On Jul 5, 1:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...(a)thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > Okay, Lesley, well it looks interesting, I've never heard of the
> > quaternionic Madelung transformation before but
>
> Neither has lesley.  In fact, lesley has never heard any of this
> BULLSHIT before she went fishing for bullshit to support her ridiculous
> "hollow earth" new-age horseshit beliefs.

Oh, so the quaternionic Madelung transformation is "bullshit"?

Tell us all about it, Ball. :)