gravity and hollow earth
in [Vegetarian]
|
From: D. Stussy on 2 Jul 2008 02:06 "Rupert" <rupertmccallum(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:5a67b41b-1713-456e-ba2d-710c04a29966(a)z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 1, 9:24 pm, dh@. wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:45:07 +0100, "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote: > > >'Einstein's General Theory was devised to explain gravity. > > > > How is gravity supposed to work in your supposed inner Earth? > > I've asked you that before, and you won't answer. Do things just > > float around? Do they have some attraction to the outer walls > > or whatever, but less so than on the surface? How do you think > > it works in there? > > Newton's laws would imply that there would be zero gravitational field > inside there, that's a result called the shell theorem. However, gravity is the least of your problems. There's alot of pressure in there. After all, gravity may be effectively zero since every direction is cancelled by its opposite, but everything from the surface down is being pulled inward on top of you.
From: Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet on 2 Jul 2008 10:48 Gravity is the same on the surface inside of the Earth as it is on the outside Earth surface. Many of the inne-Earth people have mastered the use of certain areas of their brain (that we here on the surface outside have but don't know.) This give them many abilities that we would consider as a trick or magic. They can defy gravity and move from one place to another at will by their advanced brain powers. There's so much more they have advanced technology of I could write book on it. But, I won't you'll have to go there to see it in order to believe.
From: Rupert on 2 Jul 2008 17:32 On Jul 2, 10:48 pm, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet <tadap...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Gravity is the same on the surface inside of the Earth as it is > on the outside Earth surface. So Newton was wrong? Do the inner earth beings with their advanced technology have an alternative mathematical model for gravity?
From: Rupert on 2 Jul 2008 17:46 On Jul 2, 7:21 am, "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote: > "Rupert" <rupertmccal...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:c05e5625-8101-43a4-a492-0f684de37c85(a)m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > > On Jul 1, 10:41 pm, "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote: > > > "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote in message news:... > > > > "Rupert" <rupertmccal...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:2a8eb456-bad3-40ea-8998-d37a21798a3e(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > ...'http://www.detailshere.com/solarcapacitor.htm > > > > > > As I say, if you want to make major revisions in the edifice of modern > > > > > physics we really do need to see a paper with an actual presentation > > > > > of a mathematical model. If you can find me a paper where some actual > > > > > mathematics is done I'll have a look. > > > > > I'll see what I can find online this evening. Strapped for time right now. > > > > ... Meanwhile, here's something I bookmarked a few days ago > > > which you may wish to have a look at: > > > >http://www.ntpo.com/physics/opening/open2000_2en/17.shtml > > > All right, looked at it, it hasn't got any mathematical argument in > > it... > > Yes, that's why I wrote "Meanwhile". The following does however. > It seems to be relevant, but it might as well be in chinese as far as > I'm concerned. Most of the characters appear to be foreign to my > computer's character-set too, so please go to link to find the rest.. > > '(Page 47) > .. My girlfriend has been teaching me to speak Chinese. :) Okay, so I have started looking at the pdf file in the second link, and I have found your quotation. The document seems to cover a broad range of topics. I will provide some comments soon.
From: Prince Julianus Von Rosencrantz on 2 Jul 2008 21:17
On Jul 2, 5:32 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 2, 10:48 pm, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet > > <tadap...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Gravity is the same on the surface inside of the Earth as it is > > on the outside Earth surface. > > So Newton was wrong? > > Do the inner earth beings with their advanced technology have an > alternative mathematical model for gravity? yes they do... by Eqyptian Mathematician Mostafa Abdelkader: http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/dgriffin/Research/Griffin-HE_in_Science.pdf and in fact the two worlds really are Land and Anti-Land because of this very fact. Hence a rupturing universe, and the recent dilbert cartoons. |