gravity and hollow earth
in [Vegetarian]
|
From: Rupert on 1 Jul 2008 15:21 On Jul 1, 10:41 pm, "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote: > "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote in message news:... > > "Rupert" <rupertmccal...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:2a8eb456-bad3-40ea-8998-d37a21798a3e(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > > > > ...'http://www.detailshere.com/solarcapacitor.htm > > > > As I say, if you want to make major revisions in the edifice of modern > > > physics we really do need to see a paper with an actual presentation > > > of a mathematical model. If you can find me a paper where some actual > > > mathematics is done I'll have a look. > > > I'll see what I can find online this evening. Strapped for time right now. > > ... Meanwhile, here's something I bookmarked a few days ago > which you may wish to have a look at: > > http://www.ntpo.com/physics/opening/open2000_2en/17.shtml All right, looked at it, it hasn't got any mathematical argument in it...
From: Malik J.J. Jubilee on 1 Jul 2008 18:15 On Jul 1, 4:26 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...(a)thedismalscience.not> wrote: > Rupert wrote: > > Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, fat pig-fucker and moronic cracker - lied and presented no challenge: > >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:45:07 +0100, "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote: > >>> 'Einstein's General Theory was devised to explain gravity. > >> How is gravity supposed to work in your supposed inner Earth? > >> I've asked you that before, and you won't answer. Do things just > >> float around? Do they have some attraction to the outer walls > >> or whatever, but less so than on the surface? How do you think > >> it works in there? > > > Newton's laws would imply that there would be zero gravitational field > > inside there, that's a result called the shell theorem. > > But the fantasy-land "hollow earth" in which the stupid foot masseuse > lesley believes isn't like that. i could discuss some elements of the variability of the efficiacy of physical laws under variant constraints in multiple universes co- tangent with each other... but you'd probably either a) consider it gobblygook and it would be pointless, or b) you'd misuse it... Obviously you belong to Bro Ahriman, and I ain't gonna step on his territory without permission. Chances are you haven't experientially experimented with how your consciousness affects your reality, probably out of fear of being considered a kook (even though, mistakes though one may make, at least one's trying to better life from the status quo). Eat Bacon, Read Goethe.
From: pearl on 1 Jul 2008 19:21 "Rupert" <rupertmccallum(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c05e5625-8101-43a4-a492-0f684de37c85(a)m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 1, 10:41 pm, "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote: > > "pearl" <t...(a)signguestbook.ie> wrote in message news:... > > > "Rupert" <rupertmccal...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:2a8eb456-bad3-40ea-8998-d37a21798a3e(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > ...'http://www.detailshere.com/solarcapacitor.htm > > > > > > As I say, if you want to make major revisions in the edifice of modern > > > > physics we really do need to see a paper with an actual presentation > > > > of a mathematical model. If you can find me a paper where some actual > > > > mathematics is done I'll have a look. > > > > > I'll see what I can find online this evening. Strapped for time right now. > > > > ... Meanwhile, here's something I bookmarked a few days ago > > which you may wish to have a look at: > > > > http://www.ntpo.com/physics/opening/open2000_2en/17.shtml > > All right, looked at it, it hasn't got any mathematical argument in > it... Yes, that's why I wrote "Meanwhile". The following does however. It seems to be relevant, but it might as well be in chinese as far as I'm concerned. Most of the characters appear to be foreign to my computer's character-set too, so please go to link to find the rest.. '(Page 47) ... Provided the Earth can be viewed as an electric-capacitor, then is it possible to stabilise the Chandler polar wobble via introducing an artificial electromagnetic field? - Story: The Earth is an electrified body, moving in plasma. We who stand on its surface are seldom aware of its electrical properties. That's because we live in balance with the Earth's electric field. Like a high-tension wire, our Earth produces hums and crackles as it responds to surges of power in the electric currents of space. Perhaps the most obvious sparks are the auroras. (see: http://www.gnn.tv/threads/8218/VIOLENT_SOLAR_ STORMS_MAKE_EARTHQUAKES_30_TIMES_MORE_LIKELY). - Background theory: We begin with the proposition that planetary systems, including the Earth, can be modelled as a rotating superconductor, therefore we can use the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. It is well-known that we can find an Euler-type fluid from the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. ...... ...... While we do not introduce new equations in the following sections, the fact that we can use quaternions to describe solid dynamics along with Maxwell's electromagnetic fields lead us to a conjecture that one could expect to stabilize solid dynamics rotation when it is necessary using electromagnetic fields. This is our motivation in this section. ...... ...... What is more interesting here is that in the context of the Ginzburg-Landau equation, one could write Newton's second law in the quaternionic form of equation (13): ........ We submit the viewpoint that this equation (18) is quite useful for analysing interactions between rotational rigid body dynamics and electromagnetic torque fields such as the 'Birkeland effect.' [103]. It is recommended, however, that experimental support be found for this proposition. Ref: http://www.theworld.com/sweetser/quaternions/gravity/unified_field/unified_field.html http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/UnfoldingLabyrinth.pdf
From: duh on 1 Jul 2008 21:44 "Malik J.J. Jubilee" <zevillkaa333(a)yahoo.com> wrote in i could discuss some elements of the variability of the efficiacy of physical laws under variant constraints in multiple universes co- tangent with each other... but you'd probably either a) consider it gobblygook and it would be pointless, or b) you'd misuse it... Obviously you belong to Bro Ahriman, and I ain't gonna step on his territory without permission. Chances are you haven't experientially experimented with how your consciousness affects your reality, probably out of fear of being considered a kook (even though, mistakes though one may make, at least one's trying to better life from the status quo). Eat Bacon, Read Goethe. please don't spare the eggs.
From: Malik J.J. Jubilee on 2 Jul 2008 00:30
On Jul 1, 9:44 pm, "duh" <d...(a)huh.com> wrote: > "Malik J.J. Jubilee" <zevillkaa...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in > i could discuss some elements of the variability of the efficiacy of > physical laws under variant constraints in multiple universes co- > tangent with each other... but you'd probably either a) consider it > gobblygook and it would be pointless, or b) you'd misuse it... > > Obviously you belong to Bro Ahriman, and I ain't gonna step on his > territory without permission. > > Chances are you haven't experientially experimented with how your > consciousness affects your reality, probably out of fear of being > considered a kook (even though, mistakes though one may make, at least > one's trying to better life from the status quo). > > Eat Bacon, Read Goethe. > > please don't spare the eggs. Green eggs and strange matter, by Dr. Einsuess |