fecking telesales
in [Depression]
|
Prev: Saw a poor boy coming off his bike
Next: My whinge
From: Rowland McDonnell on 21 Aug 2008 14:35 lu-lu <lu(a)lululu.com> wrote: [snip] > Heh my friend used to tell the double glazing lot that he lived in a wigwam > :) Messed 'em right up! I once knew a chap who recording, on a cassette tape, a long spiel about how he didn't want double glazing because he'd heard that they were going to re-introduce window tax, and that he was thinking of having his windows bricked up to save money. The full version lasted nearly ten minutes. If the double glazing people rang, he just hit `play' on the cassette recorder and left the tape talking to the phone. (he lived in a leased flat in a listed building with curved windows that he wasn't allowed to replace with anything at all - he'd've *liked* double glazing, if only...) Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on 22 Aug 2008 16:09 Sasquatch <simon.phillips21(a)btinternet.com> wrote: [snip] > On the contrary, you are making the choice. I would be the one choosing to telephone. You would be the one choosing to refuse to lift the receiver. > Do I block your number? No, but you would be the one choosing to not lift the receiver unless I've not blocked the number - the decision to refuse to receive the call would be made by you, not by me. > Do I stop you leaving a message? [snip] That would be my choice. But it would be your choice to refuse to lift the receiver if I rang - your choice to turn down the offer of a call. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Sasquatch on 23 Aug 2008 05:11 On 22 Aug, 21:09, real-address-in-...(a)flur.bltigibbet (Rowland McDonnell) wrote: > Sasquatch <simon.phillip...(a)btinternet.com> wrote: > > [snip] > > > On the contrary, you are making the choice. > > I would be the one choosing to telephone. You would be the one choosing > to refuse to lift the receiver. > > > Do I block your number? > > No, but you would be the one choosing to not lift the receiver unless > I've not blocked the number - the decision to refuse to receive the call > would be made by you, not by me. > > > Do I stop you leaving a message? > > [snip] > > That would be my choice. > > But it would be your choice to refuse to lift the receiver if I rang - > your choice to turn down the offer of a call. > > Rowland. > > -- > Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonn...(a)dog.physics.org > Sorry - the spam got to mehttp://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk > UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking Never your choice or responsibility eh Rowland? Be gentle on yourself Simon
From: Asperger troll on 23 Aug 2008 08:28 Rowland McDonnell wrote: > > So that means your policies are such as to deny me the opportunity to > telephone you and speak to you. Rowlie gets it wrong again.
From: Asperger troll on 23 Aug 2008 08:31
Sasquatch wrote: > Never your choice or responsibility eh Rowland? > > Be gentle on yourself > > Simon Rowlie doesn't know how to be responsible. |