From: Whining, Crying, Bawl on

4URi...(a)thanks2diderot.com wrote:
> ____________________________________________________________
> From: diderot <tamerln(a)wcnet.net>
> Subject: collateral included deaths in organic rice production [faq]
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:21:44 EDT
> Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,rec.food.veg
> Message-ID: <3790844B.34A3(a)wcnet.net>
>
> >faq: collateral included deaths in organic rice production
> >posting frequency: monthly to a.a.e.v., t.p.a., r.f.v. and other
> >newsgroups as requested. corrections or additions are solicited
> ><tamerln(a)wcnet.net>.
> >
> >a.a.e.v. and t.p.a. are regularly visited by a number of vegetarians who
> >believe(?) their dietary choice: 'saves animals' or is, somehow, 'less
> >cruel' than an omnivorous diet.
> >
> >simply, this assertion does not pass even the most cursory, minimally
> >applied logic, not to mention any degree of even the simplest research.



LOL!!!

Where's the photographic evidence?

From: Scented Nectar on
Whining, Crying, Bawl wrote:
> 4URi...(a)thanks2diderot.com wrote:
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > From: diderot <tamerln(a)wcnet.net>
> > Subject: collateral included deaths in organic rice production [faq]
> > NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:21:44 EDT
> > Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,rec.food.veg
> > Message-ID: <3790844B.34A3(a)wcnet.net>
> >
> > >faq: collateral included deaths in organic rice production
> > >posting frequency: monthly to a.a.e.v., t.p.a., r.f.v. and other
> > >newsgroups as requested. corrections or additions are solicited
> > ><tamerln(a)wcnet.net>.
> > >
> > >a.a.e.v. and t.p.a. are regularly visited by a number of vegetarians who
> > >believe(?) their dietary choice: 'saves animals' or is, somehow, 'less
> > >cruel' than an omnivorous diet.
> > >
> > >simply, this assertion does not pass even the most cursory, minimally
> > >applied logic, not to mention any degree of even the simplest research.
>
>
>
> LOL!!!
>
> Where's the photographic evidence?

And why is my rice never covered in blood and fur?

The cd counting war goes on.....:)

Scented Nectar
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/

From: dh on
On 28 Aug 2006 11:22:17 -0700, "Whining, Crying, Bawl" <bunghole-jonnie(a)lycos.com> wrote:

>
>4URi...(a)thanks2diderot.com wrote:
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> From: diderot <tamerln(a)wcnet.net>
.. . .

>> >a.a.e.v. and t.p.a. are regularly visited by a number of vegetarians who
>> >believe(?) their dietary choice: 'saves animals' or is, somehow, 'less
>> >cruel' than an omnivorous diet.
>> >
>> >simply, this assertion does not pass even the most cursory, minimally
>> >applied logic, not to mention any degree of even the simplest research.
>
>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Where's the photographic evidence?

To me there's nothing really funny about it, but we see that
the environment goes through this:

http://tinyurl.com/hpq43
http://tinyurl.com/j8v5c
http://tinyurl.com/gplhs
http://tinyurl.com/jom73
http://tinyurl.com/zkw32
http://tinyurl.com/j7lsx

and through this:

http://tinyurl.com/gt56j
http://tinyurl.com/fyh73

and later through this:

http://tinyurl.com/klkfv
http://tinyurl.com/czo32
http://tinyurl.com/fbfcm

and eventually to this:

http://tinyurl.com/epdad
http://tinyurl.com/zupzg
http://tinyurl.com/j5ckj

Even though we don't see photos dedicated to animals
being killed, anyone who knows anything at all about
animals can easily understand how the machinery,
spraying and complete changes of environment kill them.
If any person can't, that necessarily means they have no
understanding at all about how the processes influence
animals, probably because they're afraid to think about
it for some personal reason(s). It undoubtedly shows that
they have no understanding or interest in how humans
influence animals during rice production.
From: brother on
4URinfo(a)thanks2diderot.com wrote:
> ____________________________________________________________
> From: diderot <tamerln(a)wcnet.net>
> Subject: collateral included deaths in organic rice production [faq]
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:21:44 EDT
> Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,rec.food.veg
> Message-ID: <3790844B.34A3(a)wcnet.net>
>

This is seven year old uncorroborated hearsay, from a hunter, come book
seller called Robert (Bob) A Sykes. - It has no validity.
From: brother on
brother wrote:
> 4URinfo(a)thanks2diderot.com wrote:
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> From: diderot <tamerln(a)wcnet.net>
>> Subject: collateral included deaths in organic rice production [faq]
>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:21:44 EDT
>> Newsgroups:
>> alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,rec.food.veg
>> Message-ID: <3790844B.34A3(a)wcnet.net>
>>
>
> This is seven year old uncorroborated hearsay, from a hunter, come book
> seller called Robert (Bob) A Sykes. - It has no validity.

Sikes not Sykes.