From: Linda on
On Apr 4, 7:12 am, "Larry Hoover" <larryhoo...(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
> "Linda" <Indomitab...(a)netzero.com> wrote in message
>
> news:950df993-3b83-4263-8b38-9bff42cbfa1d(a)u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 3, 8:43 pm, "Larry Hoover" <larryhoo...(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > "Linda" <Indomitab...(a)netzero.com> wrote in message
> > > > My informing readers that ASD-med is chartered to discuss the world
> > > > wide use of antidepressants (rather then the world wide use of
> > > > antianxiety agents, mood stablizers, stimulants, antipsychotics,
> > > > dopamine agonists et al) is intended to be "FYI".
>
> > > Sure, Linda. We'll remember that, the next time you try to shut other
> > > posters down.
>
> I'm serious, Linda. The reason you're not in my killfile, the way you'd
> prefer it, is because I saw the way you treat other people. You have no
> right to speak to people like you do, and no right to expect different.
>
> > > FYI, you're a hypocrite. "Do as I say, not as I do." Right, Linda
> > > Gorypocrite? Or, would that indicate that you're trying to fit into two
> > > mutually exclusive social identities, making you transmental? It's awful
> > > hard to say, since you're obviously cormorbid.
> > Lie,  distort,  and/or libel all you will.
>
> I'm making fun of you, Linda. Using your own manufactured language and
> arguments. Although, I refuse to say transmentered (sic).
>
> > Your chosing to ascribe sinister intent to info OP's publish "FYI"
> > will not alter the fact the info was published "FYI"
>
> It won't change your being a hyprocrite, Linda. You're defending the
> indefensible.
>
> > > And, now that you're finally addressing the issue, what has allegations
> > > of
> > > torture in the war on terror got to do with antidepressants? Hmmm? You
> > > can't
> > > argue the victims were tortured with antidepressants, and you can't
> > > argue
> > > that they'd need them after, as that would itself be torture, according
> > > to
> > > your worldview. So, they don't fit into this story at all, Linda.
> > You are forgetting all about the individuals who have been publicly
> > identified as PERPETRATORS of torture who choose to drug
> > themselves into oblivion for a variety of reasons.
>
> I'm not forgetting anything, Linda.

Sure you weren't. <wink>.

> I'm dismissing you and your arguments.

No, you're not.

You, Larry Hoover, you are one of 500 plus usenet authors who have
spent the better part of 8 years taking turns publishing replies to
everything I say, wherein you nearly ALWAYS substitute false issues
for actual issues and/or substitute a false for true construction of
what's gone/goine on and what's been/being done.

The behavior you and the other 500 usenet authors have engaged in
against yours truly is known as ambient abuse or gaslighting.

The insidious nature of the ambient abuse which has been being engaged
in to gaslight me is such that each and every one of the individuals
who have chosen to participate in the massive effort to gaslight me
are smugly and supremely confident there won't be any repecussions for
your having conspired with hundreds of other authors engaging in
ambient abuse to gaslight me.

You are sadly mistaken.

The Royal "We" which I am a member of, have created a database to
catalogue ALL the replies of the 500 plus usenet authors who have been
taking turns replying to every damn thing I say with articles wherein
they ALWAYS substitute false issues for the actual issues and/or a
false for true construction of what's gone/going on and what's been/
being done.

If you, Larry Hoover a/k/a John Doe # 143, haven't accomplished
anything else in your life, you can always point to your having the
dubious distinction of being among the 500 plus usenet authors who
engaged in ambient abuse or gaslighting behaviors that rose to a level
that was sufficient to get you named a party to the lawsuits which
will being filed against the "Usenet 500", in due course, and,
potentially, for decades thereafter.

Now, If you haven't got nothing to say about the call for other
professionals to hound all war criminals out of the professions, out
of academia, and out of public life, THEN, don't bother replying,
unless it's your goal to have the file of Larry Hoover, a/k/a John
Doe 143 be amongst the files which consume the most megabytes.
From: MSmith on

"Linda" <Indomitable2(a)netzero.com> wrote in message
news:ec22fd31-e725-4b3c-b329-08df762e09b8(a)1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 4, 7:12 am, "Larry Hoover" <larryhoo...(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
> "Linda" <Indomitab...(a)netzero.com> wrote in message
>
> news:950df993-3b83-4263-8b38-9bff42cbfa1d(a)u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 3, 8:43 pm, "Larry Hoover" <larryhoo...(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > "Linda" <Indomitab...(a)netzero.com> wrote in message
> > > > My informing readers that ASD-med is chartered to discuss the world
> > > > wide use of antidepressants (rather then the world wide use of
> > > > antianxiety agents, mood stablizers, stimulants, antipsychotics,
> > > > dopamine agonists et al) is intended to be "FYI".
>
> > > Sure, Linda. We'll remember that, the next time you try to shut other
> > > posters down.
>
> I'm serious, Linda. The reason you're not in my killfile, the way you'd
> prefer it, is because I saw the way you treat other people. You have no
> right to speak to people like you do, and no right to expect different.
>
> > > FYI, you're a hypocrite. "Do as I say, not as I do." Right, Linda
> > > Gorypocrite? Or, would that indicate that you're trying to fit into
> > > two
> > > mutually exclusive social identities, making you transmental? It's
> > > awful
> > > hard to say, since you're obviously cormorbid.
> > Lie, distort, and/or libel all you will.
>
> I'm making fun of you, Linda. Using your own manufactured language and
> arguments. Although, I refuse to say transmentered (sic).
>
> > Your chosing to ascribe sinister intent to info OP's publish "FYI"
> > will not alter the fact the info was published "FYI"
>
> It won't change your being a hyprocrite, Linda. You're defending the
> indefensible.
>
> > > And, now that you're finally addressing the issue, what has
> > > allegations
> > > of
> > > torture in the war on terror got to do with antidepressants? Hmmm? You
> > > can't
> > > argue the victims were tortured with antidepressants, and you can't
> > > argue
> > > that they'd need them after, as that would itself be torture,
> > > according
> > > to
> > > your worldview. So, they don't fit into this story at all, Linda.
> > You are forgetting all about the individuals who have been publicly
> > identified as PERPETRATORS of torture who choose to drug
> > themselves into oblivion for a variety of reasons.
>
> I'm not forgetting anything, Linda.

Sure you weren't. <wink>.

> I'm dismissing you and your arguments.

No, you're not.

You, Larry Hoover, you are one of 500 plus usenet authors who have
spent the better part of 8 years taking turns publishing replies to
everything I say, wherein you nearly ALWAYS substitute false issues
for actual issues and/or substitute a false for true construction of
what's gone/goine on and what's been/being done.

The behavior you and the other 500 usenet authors have engaged in
against yours truly is known as ambient abuse or gaslighting.

The insidious nature of the ambient abuse which has been being engaged
in to gaslight me is such that each and every one of the individuals
who have chosen to participate in the massive effort to gaslight me
are smugly and supremely confident there won't be any repecussions for
your having conspired with hundreds of other authors engaging in
ambient abuse to gaslight me.

You are sadly mistaken.

The Royal "We" which I am a member of, have created a database to
catalogue ALL the replies of the 500 plus usenet authors who have been
taking turns replying to every damn thing I say with articles wherein
they ALWAYS substitute false issues for the actual issues and/or a
false for true construction of what's gone/going on and what's been/
being done.

If you, Larry Hoover a/k/a John Doe # 143, haven't accomplished
anything else in your life, you can always point to your having the
dubious distinction of being among the 500 plus usenet authors who
engaged in ambient abuse or gaslighting behaviors that rose to a level
that was sufficient to get you named a party to the lawsuits which
will being filed against the "Usenet 500", in due course, and,
potentially, for decades thereafter.

Now, If you haven't got nothing to say about the call for other
professionals to hound all war criminals out of the professions, out
of academia, and out of public life, THEN, don't bother replying,
unless it's your goal to have the file of Larry Hoover, a/k/a John
Doe 143 be amongst the files which consume the most megabytes.






I'm just here to remind everyone that you're an evil and hateful woman with
no life of your own outside the drama you attempt to create here. The
newbies deserve to be warned to keep their personal data out of your hands
so that you can't use it for some nefarious purpose. It's a public service.


From: Frank on

"Linda" <Indomitable2(a)netzero.com> wrote in message
news:ec22fd31-e725-4b3c-b329-08df762e09b8(a)1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
The insidious nature of the ambient abuse which has been being engaged
in to gaslight me is such that each and every one of the individuals
who have chosen to participate in the massive effort to gaslight me
are smugly and supremely confident there won't be any repecussions for
your having conspired with hundreds of other authors engaging in
ambient abuse to gaslight me.
=========================================
You have no clue what gaslighting is, idiot.

Since you have no clue
you cannot sue

The term vigilante suggests you did something which broke the law, that
the law was slow to respond and that they then took the law into their
own hands. Of course we know which laws you broke.

Vigilante and gangstalking cannot co-exist.