From: Marilyn on
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

7/6/90
#
# I am responding to a report on CNN last night.
#
# They showed a photographer, Jock Sturges, and some of his unpublished
# photos, and said the FBI confiscated them. According to the report, no
# sex was involved in the photos, he's a reputable photog, and the San
# Francisco City Council went so far as to pass a bill/resolution saying
# the FBI should release the collection.
#
# Why have you confiscated photos if no sex is involved? As far as I can
# tell, the photos would be no different from some photog books listed
# in the Library of Congress.
#
# The fact that you've confiscated the photos, but still haven't charged
# the photog, seems to indicate you're operating on auto-pilot, and that
# there is nothing wrong with the photos. I've never seen a news report
# where law enforcement wasn't sure, for this particular charge.
#
# It seems that you think some people


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 9.4.8

34k1aJQJJjijueej5Bfigj54nQ5ULL802RXHLemZmC8ToRhqW1sxZAZmwnd9WmCy
ImSkhgX+Eg6W1903tiLR3bXssX7ELCj/g9UI+QHnPkSiKD/JLJd8m+lz5mgWM7OT
4b+gy4SWa7PNktVj7R+DEjSJy7s28VC32OKjq3j1oiZcZAyqCCFNrnMUjsuUl6NS
AnHeFHOBnyk7idlz1dfe8fqO0Xe+87G6b/==
=aTJj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----