From: firemonkey on
http://www.chickyog.net/2008/09/26/zap/

Eek!!
From: Lachlan - KotU on

"firemonkey" <firemonkey(a)gatty.me.uk> wrote in message
news:48dd8296$0$515$bed64819(a)news.gradwell.net...
> http://www.chickyog.net/2008/09/26/zap/
>
> Eek!!


Christ!


From: Rowland McDonnell on
Ariel <ariella(a)mailhaven.com> wrote:

[snip]


> I'm currently reading Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion, those who are
> secure and intelligent enough to see the value of questioning their
> beliefs should be strong enough to read this book.

The problem with Dawkins is that he's as barking mad as the god
botherers he criticises.

The Royal Society's education bod was forced to resign recently, on
account of having said that pupils who raise questions in science
classes about creationism should have it explained to them that
creationism isn't scientific in a way that shows respect for their
personal beliefs.

Dawkins led the rabid attack on this perfectly reasonable chap because
of his perfectly reasonable statement.

Then it turns out that Dawkins himself appeared on telly, running a
science class, and, erm, answering a pupil's question about creationism
by explaining that creationism isn't scientific in a way that showed
respect for the pupil's beliefs. Private Eye put me on to that last
bit.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on
Ariel <ariella(a)mailhaven.com> wrote:

> Rowland McDonnell wrote:
>
> >Ariel <ariella(a)mailhaven.com> wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >> I'm currently reading Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion, those who are
> >> secure and intelligent enough to see the value of questioning their
> >> beliefs should be strong enough to read this book.
> >
> >The problem with Dawkins is that he's as barking mad as the god
> >botherers he criticises.
>
> Oh dear, there goes another of my would-be-heroes, I was just warming
> to him as well.

I can't say I've got heros as such. Dawkins is certainly not one of
them. I despise the man.

You make up your own mind, though.

> >The Royal Society's education bod was forced to resign recently, on
> >account of having said that pupils who raise questions in science
> >classes about creationism should have it explained to them that
> >creationism isn't scientific in a way that shows respect for their
> >personal beliefs.
> >
> >Dawkins led the rabid attack on this perfectly reasonable chap because
> >of his perfectly reasonable statement.
>
> I remember hearing about that only two of three weeks ago, I mean how
> he was rather harshly forced to resign but I didn't realise that
> Dawkins was involved in that.

Dawkins criticised the man for telling people that they should behave in
the way that Dawkins behaved. Dawkins led the slavering pack that
pushed him out of his job - pushed him out of a job for telling people
that they should behave in the sensible, reasonable, civilised fashion
that Dawkins himself considers the right thing to do, as we have seen
from what Dawkins actually does.

Dawkins is a lunatic and a hypocrite and he's doing a lot to harm
rationality in society.

> >Then it turns out that Dawkins himself appeared on telly, running a
> >science class, and, erm, answering a pupil's question about creationism
> >by explaining that creationism isn't scientific in a way that showed
> >respect for the pupil's beliefs. Private Eye put me on to that last
> >bit.
> >
> >Rowland.
>
> Well, no-one likes a hypocrite but, even so, his book is brilliantly
> argued and often very funny.

Dawkins is barking mad, I promise you.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking