From: Linda on
On Mar 3, 2:11 am, "Viscount" <Viscoun...(a)satline.net> wrote:
> You've still got it wrong, Linda.

No, I don't, Fred.


>Someone posted emails between me
> and Andrew.

I know.


>I'm not responsible for misinterpretations of their
> content;

I know.

Nor, am I responsible for your misinterpretation of my text.

My assertion is that Pablo was livid at the very idea that AC had been
exhorting a philadelphian to tape record their conversations with the
FBI.

I substantiated my assertion by my republishing an article Pablo
published where Pablo had placed the allegation that AC had exhorted a
philadelphian to tape record their conversations with the FBI at the
top of the list of pablo's allegations about AC 's tape recording OP
conversations.

I will not engage you in further discussion about what IS a matter of
public document FACT.


> How 'bout starting with, say, Sunday
> morning, from the time you get up, on an hourly basis just exactly how
> these so-called stalkers are interfering with *anything* at all in
> your life.

ROFLMOA

The only thing I might do in reaction to your smearing me as
"paranoid" because I state what is obvious and/or self evident is to
KILLFILE you, too.

PS I believe this disagreement may be the result of your having
misread what I said.
To wit: I didn't say you tape recorded your conversations with the
FBI.

Consider re-reading what I actually said before making any more
replies to me.





From: Kitty Genovese II on


Who is Henry Wolenski?






>
>
>


From: card xii on

"Kitty Genovese II" <indomitable2(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:CrkGh.8696$Jl.4177(a)newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>
> Who is Henry Wolenski?
>


That's easy: another person who hates and disrespects Linda Marie Gore.

Of course, that's true for everybody. Even Ehrenfels.

card xii