From: Lucas Buck on
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:59:28 +0200, Andrzej Rosa <bakters(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>Curt wrote:
>
>> On Aug 25, 8:32�am, David Cohen <sammies...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Actually, I have insomnia and am bored.
>>
>> Did someone say goats?
>>
>> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v108/curt_james/MFW/sheep.jpg
>>
>> Goat, sheep, whatever.
>
>But why did he chose such an ugly one?

There's no accounting for the taste of sheep.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
From: Omelet on
In article
<529edeaf-9bdf-498a-8842-337da80e95fb(a)d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 25, 8:32�am, David Cohen <sammies...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Actually, I have insomnia and am bored.
>
> Did someone say goats?
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v108/curt james/MFW/sheep.jpg
>
> Goat, sheep, whatever.
>
> --

Image has been deleted...
--
Peace! Om

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
- Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
From: Omelet on
In article <bha9b4dpofavccshmc397n0gl0frc74rde(a)4ax.com>,
Lucas Buck <sbcpark(a)earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:

> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v108/curt_james/MFW/sheep.jpg

Ah there it is. I missed the _underscore.
--
Peace! Om

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
- Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
From: Andrzej Rosa on
David Cohen wrote:

> On Aug 26, 3:47 pm, Andrzej Rosa <bakt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> She took after mommy?
>>
>> >> > I'll pay for breast reduction surgery.
>>
>> >> We call it a gardener's dog syndrome.  Even though he can't use the
>> >> stuff himself, he won't let others.
>>
>> > True.
>>
>> > But I don't understand the gardener's dog reference.
>>
>> Because you never had a dog, only pets.  Real dogs do things, like
>> guarding gardens, for example.
>
> But, why would the gardener NOT use the products of his garden?

Gardener's dog, not the gardener! You are like a gardener's dog, when you
prevent others from using what you can't use yourself.

Damn, is that saying too sophisticated for a city dweller already? You have
a garden, you put a dog in to guard it, and this dog will not let others
have those veggies even though it can't eat them either.

Oh, I know. You don't silently assume that in the garden you would
primarily grow things for eating! So maybe this saying is too far removed
from your reality to be of any use nowadays, after all.

> I can
> understand him not wanting others to use them, but, why can't he "use
> the stuff himself"?

It's food there, just not food fit for dogs.

> Is this some kind of Polish thing that just doesn't translate well?

Not really Polish. It's a saying from ancient times when there were no
supermarkets, refrigerators or cheap bananas from another continent. If
you wanted to have herbs, less obvious veggies and fresh too, you needed a
garden. Of course there would be flowers there too, just not exclusively.

BTW - My mom still has a garden like that. She grows most of the veggies we
eat, and they taste delicious. I'm used to complain about it, because I
don't want her to work too hard, but she and my auntie simply can't live
without growing stuff. They are country girls through and through.

--
Andrzej Rosa
From: David Cohen on
On Aug 27, 6:28 am, Andrzej Rosa <bakt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> David Cohen wrote:
> > On Aug 26, 3:47 pm, Andrzej Rosa <bakt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> She took after mommy?
>
> >> >> > I'll pay for breast reduction surgery.
>
> >> >> We call it a gardener's dog syndrome.  Even though he can't use the
> >> >> stuff himself, he won't let others.
>
> >> > True.
>
> >> > But I don't understand the gardener's dog reference.
>
> >> Because you never had a dog, only pets.  Real dogs do things, like
> >> guarding gardens, for example.
>
> > But, why  would the gardener NOT use the products of his garden?
>
> Gardener's dog, not the gardener!  You are like a gardener's dog, when you
> prevent others from using what you can't use yourself.  
>
> Damn, is that saying too sophisticated for a city dweller already?  You have
> a garden, you put a dog in to guard it, and this dog will not let others
> have those veggies even though it can't eat them either.

Still makes no sense. The dog isn't guarding the garden for himself.
It is his job. Exactly analogous to a bank guard who can't use the
bank's money himself, but still won't let you steal it.

Ancient Polish sayings suck.

> BTW - My mom still has a garden like that.  She grows most of the veggies we
> eat, and they taste delicious.  I'm used to complain about it, because I
> don't want her to work too hard, but she and my auntie simply can't live
> without growing stuff.  They are country girls through and through.

Will the dog let you take some veggies?