From: dh on
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Goo bitched:

>Coming into existence - "getting to experience life", in your shitty
>unreadable prose - is not a benefit.

How can you read it if you can't read it, Goo? In all your
years of bitching, you've never suggested a better way of
putting it. Try doing that, you lame Goober. GO:
From: Mr.Smartypants on
On Apr 23, 3:13 pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Goo bitched:
>
> >Coming into existence - "getting to experience life", in your shitty
> >unreadable prose - is not a benefit.
>
>     How can you read it if you can't read it, Goo? In all your
> years of bitching, you've never suggested a better way of
> putting it. Try doing that, you lame Goober. GO:


Yes, it will be interesting to see if Goobs thinks he can explain how
he read what he claims is unreadable.

I think we're going to see another "dictionary moment."


From: dh on
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Goo wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:13:13 +0900, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Goo bitched:
>>
>>>Coming into existence - "getting to experience life", in your shitty
>>>unreadable prose - is not a benefit.
>>
>> How can you read it if you can't read it, Goo? In all your
>>years of bitching, you've never suggested a better way of
>>putting it. Try doing that, you lame Goober. GO:
>
>I can read it. It's shitty writing,

Try suggesting a BETTER way, you LAME GOOBER. GO!:

>but I can read it. Your point is
>bullshit: "getting to experience life" is not a benefit.

Try explaining how you think anything about pre-existence
prevents existing creatures from benefitting from their lives,
you lamest of Goobers. Go Goo, GO!!!: