From: rpautrey2 on

Why Organic Foods are Better for Health


Can organic foods really improve my health?

Yes. Organically grown food is your best way of reducing exposure to
toxins used in conventional agricultural practices. These toxins
include not only pesticides, many of which have been federally
classified as potential cancer-causing agents, but also heavy metals
such as lead and mercury, and solvents like benzene and toluene.
Minimizing exposure to these toxins is of major benefit to your
health. Heavy metals damage nerve function, contributing to diseases
such as multiple sclerosis and lowering IQ, and also block hemoglobin
production, causing anemia. Solvents damage white cells, lowering the
immune system's ability to resist infections. In addition to
significantly lessening your exposure to these health-robbing
substances, organically grown foods have been shown to contain
substantially higher levels of nutrients such as protein, vitamin C
and many minerals.

How do organic foods benefit cellular health?

DNA: Eating organically grown foods may help to better sustain health
since recent test tube animal research suggests that certain
agricultural chemicals used in the conventional method of growing food
may have the ability to cause genetic mutations that can lead to the
development of cancer. One example is pentachlorophenol (PCP) that has
been found to be able to cause DNA fragmentation in animals.
Mitochondria: Eating organically grown foods may help to better
promote cellular health since several agricultural chemicals used in
the conventional growing of foods have been shown to have a negative
effect upon mitochondrial function. These chemicals include paraquat,
parathion, dinoseb and 2-4-D which have been found to affect the
mitochondria and cellular energy production in a variety of ways
including increasing membrane permeability, which exposes the
mitochondria to damaging free radicals, inhibiting a process known as
coupling that is integral to the efficient production of ATP. Cell
Membrane: Since certain agricultural chemicals may damage the
structure and function of the cellular membrane, eating organically
grown foods can help to protect cellular health. The insecticide
endosulfan and the herbicide paraquat have been shown to oxidize lipid
molecules and therefore may damage the phospholipid component of the
cellular membrane. In animal studies, pesticides such as chlopyrifos,
endrin and fenthion have been shown to over stimulate enzymes involved
in chemical signaling causing imbalance that has been linked to
conditions such as atherosclerosis, psoriasis and inflammation.

How can organic foods contribute to children's health?

The negative health effects of conventionally grown foods, and
therefore the benefits of consuming organic foods, are not just
limited to adults. In fact, many experts feel that organic foods may
be of paramount importance in safeguarding the health of our
children.

In two separate reports, both the Natural Resources Defense Council
(1989) and the Environmental Working Group (1998) found that millions
of American children are exposed to levels of pesticides through their
food that surpass limits considered to be safe. Some of these
pesticides are known to be neurotoxic, able to cause harm to the
developing brain and nervous system. Additionally, some researchers
feel that children and adolescents may be especially vulnerable to the
cancer-causing effects of certain pesticides since the body is more
sensitive to the impact of these materials during periods of high
growth rates and breast development.

The concern for the effects of agricultural chemicals on children's
health seems so evident that even the U.S. government has taken steps
to protect our nation's young. In 1996, Congress passed the Food
Quality Protection Act requiring that all pesticides applied to foods
be safe for infants and children.

Organic foods that are strictly controlled for substances harmful to
health can play a major role in assuring the health of our children.

Are organic foods nutritionally superior to conventionally grown
foods?

Yes, and significantly more. Proof of their superiority has been
demonstrated in numerous studies. In 1998, a review of 34 studies
comparing the nutritional content of organic versus non-organic food
was published in the peer-reviewed, MEDLINE-indexed journal
Alternative Therapies (Volume 4, No. 1, pgs. 58-69). In this review,
organic food was found to have higher protein quality in all
comparisons, higher levels of vitamin C in 58% of all studies, 5-20%
higher mineral levels for all but two minerals. In some cases, the
mineral levels were dramatically higher in organically-grown foods-as
much as three times higher in one study involving iron content.

Organic foods may also contain more flavonoids than conventionally
grown foods, according to Danish research published in the August 2003
issue of the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. In this
study, 16 healthy non-smoking participants ranging in age from 21-35
years were given either a diet high in organically or conventionally
grown fruits and vegetables for 22 days, after which they were
switched over to the other diet for another 22 days. After both
dietary trials, the researchers analyzed levels of flavonoids and
other markers of antioxidant defenses in the food and in the
participants' blood and urine samples. Results indicated a
significantly higher content of the flavonoid quercitin in the organic
produce and in the subjects' urine samples when on the organic produce
diet, plus the subjects' urinary levels of another flavonoid,
kaempferol, were also much higher when on the organically grown
compared to the conventionally grown diet.(October 4, 2003)

What substances do we avoid by eating organic food?

Over 3,000 high-risk toxins routinely present in the U.S. food supply
are, by law, excluded from organic food, including: Pesticides: By far
the largest group of toxins to be largely prohibited from organically
grown foods are synthetic pesticides, which are found virtually
everywhere else in the food supply. Several hundred different
chemicals and several thousand brand-name pesticide products are
legally used in commercial food production in the U.S. Act of 1992;
the Environmental Protection Agency had classified 73 pesticides
authorized for agricultural use as potential carcinogens (cancer-
causing agents). And pesticides don't just remain where they are
applied. A 1996 study by the Environmental Working Group found 96% of
all water samples taken from 748 towns across the U.S. contained the
pesticide atrazine, and at least 20 different chemical pesticides are
routinely present in municipal tap water across the U.S. Heavy metals:
The toxic metals cadmium, lead, and mercury enter the food supply
through industrial pollution of soil and groundwater and through
machinery used in food processing and packaging. Cadmium, which can be
concentrated in plant tissues at levels higher than those in soil, has
been linked to lung, prostate and testicular cancers. Despite lead's
long-recognized serious adverse impact on health, especially that of
young children, lead solder is still used to seal tin cans, imparting
the lead residues found in many canned foods. Even low levels of lead
are harmful and are associated with decreased intelligence, impaired
neurobehavioral development, decreased stature and growth, and
impaired hearing. Mercury is toxic to brain cells and has been linked
to autism and Alzheimer's disease. Solvents: Used to dissolve food
components and produce food additives, solvents are also virtually
omnipresent in commercially processed food. Solvents, such as benzene
and toluene have been linked to numerous cancers. Benzene,
specifically, has been repeatedly associated with rheumatoid arthritis-
an auto-immune condition involving pain and degeneration in the joints
that affects over 2 million adults in the U.S.

Not only are these toxic substances harmful singly, but when combined,
as they are in commercially grown and processed food, and in the human
body where they accumulate, their effects have been found to be
magnified as much as a 1,000-fold.

© 2001-2008 The George Mateljan Foundation
http://whfoods.org/genpage.php?pfriendly=1&tname=george&dbid=124
From: vernono on

"rpautrey2" <rpautrey2(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ad7e5f80-3298-4714-9876-4f6fc409c329(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

Nonsense deleted.
"THEORETICALLY" in a perfect environment organics can be better. They
aren't. Most of the twits who push organics have never seen the real
growing environment.


THE number one requirement is that all mulches and manures MUST be at least
fourth generation organic.




From: rpautrey2 on
On Aug 7, 3:19 pm, "vernono" <vern...(a)there.com> wrote:
> "rpautrey2" <rpautr...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ad7e5f80-3298-4714-9876-4f6fc409c329(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> Nonsense deleted.
> "THEORETICALLY" in a perfect environment organics can be better.  They
> aren't.  Most of the twits who push organics have never seen the real
> growing environment.
>
> THE number one requirement is that all mulches and manures MUST be at least
> fourth generation organic.


Mr. Green Jeans: Thanks for the input. Paul