From: The One True Zhen Jue on
On Jan 3, 12:52 am, jurim...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
> On Jan 2, 1:29 am, Martin <idontwantno(a)spam> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:03:13 +1100, "Carole" <hub...(a)iimetro.com.au>
> > wrote:
>
> > >"Martin" <idontwantno(a)spam> wrote in message
> > >news:e0lkn35p87rql3v1vg219g8sgv9edbe14j(a)4ax.com...
> > >> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:20:48 +1100, "Carole" <hub...(a)iimetro.com.au>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> >Some good Hulda Clark links at
> > >> >http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/HuldaClark/index.htm
>
> > >> >Including a link to one of her earlier books, 'The Cure for all Diseases'
> > >> >which is online in pdf format.
>
> > >> >I'm going to have a read and find out just what she is all about.
>
> > >> >Carole
> > >> >www.cellsalts.net
>
> > >> Carole, why would you waste even one minute reading any of her stuff,
> > >> other than out of morbid curiosity, since she can not produce even one
> > >> person her 'Cure' has cured? Don't you have a life?
>
> > >I see what you mean about her methods. If I was her, and trying to sell an
> > >unconventional theory such as fluke worms, I would go into more detail to
> > >explain why people had never seen them before and how researchers had missed
> > >them.
>
> > If *I* was her, I'd show some people to the world who I had cured of
> > cancer. Only then would I go into the methods. Who cares about methods
> > if you can't show there any effect that needs explaining?
> > Of course, the fact that there are no such people speaks volumes. At
> > least to me. Apparently, it does not bother you at all.
>
> > >She says these parasites exist because their frequency shows up with the
> > >zapper -- maybe. (I need to think about it a bit more.)
>
> > So basically she says that she knows the parasites were there because
> > her zapper made them go away. Pretty convenient, don't you think?
>
> > >She gives a fair few areas where she zaps parasites and then advises on
> > >avoiding pollutants which she says is their breeding ground, for example
> > >isopropyl alcohol encourages fluke worms. She's never seen a cancer case
> > >without these fluke worms. Maybe the reason that nobody sees them is that
> > >they change their form into something tiny or looks like something else..
>
> > Carole, doctors do find these parasites. But there isn't even a
> > correlation between cancer and these parasites. There is however a
> > correlation between geography and these parasites. They exist in
> > certain areas and they do not exist in others. And there is no
> > difference in the prevelance of cancer between these areas. That tells
> > us that Clark is talking nonsense.
>
> > >Hulda has quite a few books - seehttp://www.drclark.com/
>
> > >The cure for all diseases
> > >The cure for all cancers
> > >The cure for all advanced cancers
> > >The cure for HIV and AIDS
>
> > Why weren't the last 3 cures already in the first? Was Hulda lying
> > when she called the first book the cure for *all*  diseases? (hint for
> > Carole: *all* disease includes cancer, advanced cancer and AIDS. HIV
> > isn't a disease btw).
>
> > >Book "Syncrometer Science Laboratory Manual"
> > >Book "The Prevention of all Cancers
> > >Book "The Tooth Truth"
>
> > >As well as her books there are -- videos, detox products, vitamins, zappers
> > >etc.
> > >And on another part of the website there is a page soliciting donations --
> > >why?
>
> > Yes, why? Why wouldn't anyone who can cure all disease with no more
> > than a zap be richer than Bill Gates?
> > BTW, I think there is a movie out about the zapper, at least the title
> > suggests so:http://imdb.com/title/tt0084945/
>
> > >> And how about this: first she published this book which supposedly
> > >> contains the cure for *all* diseases, then she published a book with
> > >> the cure for cancer. That should have been in the first book, since
> > >> it's the cure for *all* disease. Something doesn't add up here Carole..
>
> > >Carole
> > >www.cellsalts.net
> > >www.conspiracee.com-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Martin:
>
> I am curious about who you are, who you work for, why you are here,
> and why you hide behind a fake email address.

Tim, we are curious about why you can't find work and live in a shack
in the woods.
Could it be due to the fact that you can't remember what you studied
in tech college?

Can you enlighten us by answering the question quicker than you were
able to recall where you live?


>
> Can you enlighten us?  You sound strangely bitter and angry, and I am
> aware that there are some countries. like Holland for instance, that
> allow their prisoners, and patients in psychiatric facilities, to use
> computers at certain times.  Are you one of those?  If so, could you
> tell us why you are confined there?
>
> Curious in California...
>
> Tim Bolen- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <iqlmn3de4u4h84attrv3mblukm831h8dka(a)4ax.com>, Martin wrote:

> So basically she says that she knows the parasites were there because
> her zapper made them go away. Pretty convenient, don't you think?

Invisible elephant repellant?

--
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable |
| e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. |
| There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> --------------+
From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <1odln3hrq20qo83ar8p0lqvjj1bvcl89t9(a)4ax.com>, Peter Bowditch wrote:
> jurimed2(a)yahoo.com wrote:

>>Martin (poor peter)
>
> Is that a suggestion that Martin is me or vice versa?

That, or another Ilena-style attempt to denigrate his
his reproductive equipment.

--
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable |
| e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. |
| There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> --------------+
From: Jan Drew on

Tim,

YO, Richard! See the title of this thread?
Is *Tim* the subject? A simple yes or no will do.
From: Jan Drew on

>
> Invisible elephant repellant?
>
Is not the subject.