From: Rowland McDonnell on
Mentally Sub-Normal <sarah.j.balfour(a)gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

> Are there *any* female shrinks in this country?

Yes, and the one woman consultant shrink I've met was a evil, vindictive
cows who you do *NOT* want to go anywhere near. Vile creature, purely
vile, probably does nothing but evil with all her life.

> Bearing in mind that
> most of my abusers have been men, is it any wonder I have problems
> dealing with male psychiatric workers of any species? I just feel I
> might be able to talk to a woman - maybe a woman would be able to
> empathise in a way a bloke just can't.

The women tend to be worse. I could give you tales of nurses and
managers.

[snip]

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Sasquatch on

Mentally Sub-Normal wrote:

> <snipped but read>
> Hope everyone else is doing (slightly) better this evening.
>
> Sarah
> xxxxxx
> (insane and 'incontinent')

Heya,

Xenical has some horrible side effects sweetie (btw not sure if you got
my email). The only way to minimize them is simply to remove ALL fats
from your diet, eat loads of wholemeal, bran type things and don't
cough!

Curries, (yummm :o) ) are often cooked with ghee, clarified butter.
This doesnt go well with Xenical, in fact, it makes matters worse in
that NONE of it is absorbed so the "explosive squits" is even more
explosive and squitty.

Tell your doc and see if he/she/it will take you off Xenical and put
you on Reductil. Reductil is an appetite suppressant, not a fat
blocker, so the squits aren't an issue.

Be gentle on yourself

Simon

From: Tim on
Mentally Sub-Normal wrote:



>
It's so bad, I've now had to resort to incontinence pads. Do you have
> any idea how embarassing it is, aged 30, to be handing over a pack of
> Tena Lady to the 16-year-old (female) assistant in Boots? I tried
> Always nights but they didn't do the trick, so it's now come to this.
>
> Hope everyone else is doing (slightly) better this evening.
>
Sarah
> xxxxxx
> (insane and 'incontinent')
>

(((((Sarah))))) I used to get very funny looks
when buying tena incontinence knickers for Brenda.
Luckily the local incontinence service eventually
condescended to deliver the incontinence knickers.I am sure the girls
in the chemists had me marked down as a transvestic infantalist!


http/www.last.fm/user/dyslimbic/
From: Rowland McDonnell on
TrollFoodDispenser <ru(a)shittin.gme> wrote:

[snip]

> But it still did not take you 89000 words to detail your wife's problems
> (which I'm sorry to hear about BTW).

89000 words is the length of a substantial novel. Sarah used fewer than
1000 words. It looked to be about 1000 words to me, and I asked the
machine to do a word count (it said 972). btw, I used to be a paid
scribbler, so I'm used to judging `how many words' - `We need about 500
words for this space' or `We need another 6000 words for this' or
whatever. I was often the one who wrote the words when needed (I
started out as half an assistant editor on two magazines - each one was
put together by 1.5 editorial staff, me being the `0.5' in each case.
And yes, my desk was in between those of my two editors (oh, there were
filing cabinets and whatnot littering the place too - don't think neatly
regimented rows like school, oh no, not when you're using the floor as
filing space) - I wondered if a day would come when they would try to
cleave me in two...). 500 words can be dashed off pretty quickly[1].
6000 words of decent technical content takes at least half a working
day, but only if you're a good typist who's at it flat out and you know
the field before you hit the keyboard (and if you do that kind of thing
all the bloody time - well, you wonder why some journalists drink
heavily?) - if not, at least a day. 6000 words of mindless wittering
can be dashed off rather more quickly.

I think the problem is your inability to cope with more than an SMS
amount of text in one go. This might be an indication of an underlying
cognitive problem. Poor education might be to blame, of course.

So: 1000 words is quite a short bit of writing, really, but you got the
idea that she'd written nearly 100 times that much. I'd say you've got
serious problems in that area. Couple that to the other evidence of
your mental problems, and it adds up to a worrying picture of a
seriously disturbed and somewhat mentally disabled person, possibly with
learning disabilities. Please, for your sake, do go and see your doctor
about your mental health problems. You need to.

Rowland[2].

[1] Does this explain why my posts tend to be full of words? If you're
writing every day for food and shelter (which is what you are doing if
it's how you earn your way in the world), you learn how to write, any
time, any place, any state of mind. I find it very, very easy to `just
write'. Well, provided that I've got a keyboard to type on, that is.
You don't want to try to decypher my handwriting.

[2] And as you can tell, not a monkey. I'm an ape, damnit! Apes can
write, monkeys can't.


--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on
Tim <usenet(a)dysphoric.co.uk> wrote:

[snip]

> (((((Sarah))))) I used to get very funny looks
> when buying tena incontinence knickers for Brenda.

Strange.

> Luckily the local incontinence service eventually
> condescended to deliver the incontinence knickers.I am sure the girls
> in the chemists had me marked down as a transvestic infantalist!

Either that, or could they have perhaps made the leap to `father'?

Rowland.
(making some leaps himself)

[snip]


--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking