From: "Paul Bartram" p.bartram AT OR NEAR on

"Commander Hughes" <noneofyourfuckingbusiness(a)all.com> wrote

> It's interesting to note that I had to go through several doctors to see
> about me because when my kidney's failed I would say they were more than
> terrified of the prospect of having to operate on me, thinking that maybe
> it
> wouldn't last very long - they were right with the first op - not so with
> the second one and I hope to prove them wrong for many years to come.

From what I've heard from nursing staff, surgeons are nervous about cutting
on anyone with 'complicating conditions' not only because they don't like
the dramas they might encounter, but because it might lead to legal
consequences. Before even the most minor procedure these days (like the
parathyroidectomy I had a while back) the actual surgeon will call you in
for a consultation at which he will outline every possible complication that
could happen, barring an earthquake collapsing the ceiling on you! They need
to do this for insurance purposes (you sign a waiver or forget about the
operation) but of course it scares the tripe out of the patient.

Certainly with organ transplants they have to look very carefully at the
overall fitness of the recipient. Dialysis patients suffer from
calcification of arteries, making attachment more like PVC plumbing joints
than surgery. Many ESRF patients have diabetes, which also has ramifications
for the surgeon. However, a lady on our ward has just gone back on the
transplant list, and she has epilepsy. This surprised me, because just
imagine having your patient go into spasm while you are in up to your
elbows...

Paul


From: Chuk Goodin on
On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:27:46 +1000, "Paul Bartram" <p.bartram AT OR NEAR
mysoul.com.au> wrote:
> However, a lady on our ward has just gone back on the
>transplant list, and she has epilepsy. This surprised me, because just
>imagine having your patient go into spasm while you are in up to your
>elbows...

I'm pretty sure that the anesthetics used would prevent you from moving
even from a seizure. Certainly it could complicate other treatments,
though.
--
chuk
From: Commander Hughes on

"Paul Bartram" <p.bartram AT OR NEAR mysoul.com.au> wrote in message
news:4833b2d7$0$33304$c30e37c6(a)pit-reader.telstra.net...
>
> "Commander Hughes" <noneofyourfuckingbusiness(a)all.com> wrote
>
> > It's interesting to note that I had to go through several doctors to see
> > about me because when my kidney's failed I would say they were more than
> > terrified of the prospect of having to operate on me, thinking that
maybe
> > it
> > wouldn't last very long - they were right with the first op - not so
with
> > the second one and I hope to prove them wrong for many years to come.
>
> From what I've heard from nursing staff, surgeons are nervous about
cutting
> on anyone with 'complicating conditions' not only because they don't like
> the dramas they might encounter, but because it might lead to legal
> consequences. Before even the most minor procedure these days (like the
> parathyroidectomy I had a while back) the actual surgeon will call you in
> for a consultation at which he will outline every possible complication
that
> could happen, barring an earthquake collapsing the ceiling on you! They
need
> to do this for insurance purposes (you sign a waiver or forget about the
> operation) but of course it scares the tripe out of the patient.
>
> Certainly with organ transplants they have to look very carefully at the
> overall fitness of the recipient. Dialysis patients suffer from
> calcification of arteries, making attachment more like PVC plumbing joints
> than surgery. Many ESRF patients have diabetes, which also has
ramifications
> for the surgeon. However, a lady on our ward has just gone back on the
> transplant list, and she has epilepsy. This surprised me, because just
> imagine having your patient go into spasm while you are in up to your
> elbows...
>
> Paul

I sense a slight bit of ignorance towards certain disabilities in your post
Paul, no offense, but I do especially see it with the last statement you
just made. Quite offensive actually. However, back to the points made, I
was certainly scared to death of any waiver they handed me to look at while
I was younger - I couldn't sign it obviously but just the thought made you
that little bit nervous going into the operating theatre!


James
aka
Commander Hughes

>
>


From: "Paul Bartram" p.bartram AT OR NEAR on

> "Chuk Goodin" <cgoodin(a)sfu.ca> wrote
>> "Paul Bartram" <p.bartram AT OR NEAR mysoul.com.au> wrote:

>> However, a lady on our ward has just gone back on the
>>transplant list, and she has epilepsy. This surprised me, because just
>>imagine having your patient go into spasm while you are in up to your
>>elbows...

> I'm pretty sure that the anaesthetics used would prevent you from moving
> even from a seizure. Certainly it could complicate other treatments,
> though.

I found a few references via Google of patients going into seizure during
procedures, but these were mainly where levels of anaesthesia were altered
during the work for technical reasons. In deep sleep, seizure *is* probably
unlikely.

As far as dialysis is concerned, this particular lady had a grand mal just
as the nurse was removing the cannulas after treatment. An exiting time was
had by all on that occasion - it was frightening just to watch from across
the ward. Nurses simply aren't paid enough for what they do!

Paul



From: "Paul Bartram" p.bartram AT OR NEAR on

"Commander Hughes" wrote

> I sense a slight bit of ignorance towards certain disabilities in your
> post
> Paul, no offense, but I do especially see it with the last statement you
> just made. Quite offensive actually.

See my previous post, composed off line before I read yours. Yes, ignorance
no doubt, but I'm always willing to learn, and I think this group is a good
starting place as fellow sufferers get together round the virtual campfire
and talk.

In this particular case, the lady I'm referring to was herself surprised
that they were considering her for the transplant list, assuming that she
would never be eligible. Maybe 5 or 10 years ago she wouldn't have been, but
technology moves on, and things can be done now that couldn't be risked
then. Certainly diabetes (which she also suffers from) is no longer a
definite barrier to transplant.

> However, back to the points made, I
> was certainly scared to death of any waiver they handed me to look at
> while
> I was younger - I couldn't sign it obviously but just the thought made you
> that little bit nervous going into the operating theatre!

In our public system, if you don't sign the waiver, they don't operate - end
of...

Paul