'Vaccines court' rejects mercury-autism link in 3 test cases
in [Alternative]
|
Prev: Special Masters Protect Vaccine Program and Deny Justice to Vaccine-Injured Children
Next: Please get help
From: Mark Probert on 13 Mar 2010 18:40 On Mar 13, 6:27 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote: > Special Masters Protect Vaccine Program and Deny Justice to Vaccine-Injured > Childrenhttp://www.ageofautism.com/2010/03/special-masters-protect-vaccine-pr... fRead the decisions For the facts. I know it is hard to accept this, especially the group thinking drones at AoA, but, time to realize that you are wrong.
From: Peter Moran on 13 Mar 2010 19:05 "Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:caa61eae-d17a-4c3c-b58c-3a13df125b3f(a)q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Mar 13, 6:27 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote: > Special Masters Protect Vaccine Program and Deny Justice to > Vaccine-Injured > Childrenhttp://www.ageofautism.com/2010/03/special-masters-protect-vaccine-pr... fRead the decisions For the facts. I know it is hard to accept this, especially the group thinking drones at AoA, but, time to realize that you are wrong. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Yes. As exhaustive a review of the evidence as you will find anywhere in these decisions http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/node/5026 In these carefully chosen test "best cases" patients, lawyers, and the doctors who claimed that vaccines cause autism have been given every opportunity to establish their case to moderate levels of probability. What stood out in these best cases was the lack of any clear timing of the onset of the symptoms of autism to vaccine exposure. Yet it was precisely the claim of such associations, from understandably distraught parents, looking for an explanation for an illness that does not involve any shortcoming in themselves or their genetic makeup, that have initiated and sustained the whole affair. Many of these children went through the further miseries of unnecessary tests and invasive treatments at the hands of the doctors testifying here without any benefit. PM
From: Mark Probert-Drew on 13 Mar 2010 19:30 On Mar 13, 7:05 pm, "Peter Moran" <pmo...(a)internode.on.net> wrote: > "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:caa61eae-d17a-4c3c-b58c-3a13df125b3f(a)q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 13, 6:27 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote: > > > Special Masters Protect Vaccine Program and Deny Justice to > > Vaccine-Injured > > Childrenhttp://www.ageofautism.com/2010/03/special-masters-protect-vaccine-pr... > > fRead the decisions For the facts. I know it is hard to accept this, > especially the group thinking drones at AoA, but, time to realize that > you are wrong. > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Yes. As exhaustive a review of the evidence as you will find anywhere in > these decisions http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/node/5026 > In these carefully chosen test "best cases" patients Chosen by the Petitioner's Steering Committee, i.e. the parents' lawyers. , lawyers, and the > doctors who claimed that vaccines cause autism have been given every > opportunity to establish their case to moderate levels of probability. Correct. The Special Masters admitted every shred of evidence that the PSC offered. No stone was left unturned. > What stood out in these best cases was the lack of any clear timing of the > onset of the symptoms of autism to vaccine exposure. Yet it was precisely > the claim of such associations, from understandably distraught parents, > looking for an explanation for an illness that does not involve any > shortcoming in themselves or their genetic makeup, that have initiated and > sustained the whole affair. Many of these children went through the > further miseries of unnecessary tests and invasive treatments at the hands > of the doctors testifying here without any benefit. Agreed. These children were lab rats. I thought the Special Masters grasp of neuronal death was brilliant.
From: Jan Drew on 13 Mar 2010 19:39 On Mar 13, 8:20�am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote: > Lefty wrote: > > Mark Probert wrote: > >> On Mar 12, 5:41 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote: > >>> The court is right on this one. > > >>>http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-autism13-2010mar13,0,10037.... > > >> You have to read the decisions as I am doing. I am awed at the quality > >> of the analysis. Brilliant understanding of the science. I posted the > >> link to the three decisions earlier. > > > �Court, the place and people who accepted Mark as an attorney, one of > > their own. Why would any honest thinking person accept their "ruling"? > > Follow the money, it will lead you to truth. > > Where is the money for the courts? > > And, are you saying that there is no way the courts came to a good decision? > > Have you read the opinions? IMHO, the opinions the special masters wrote > were very good. They did an excellent job of find *all* the facts. They > correctly concluded, based on the facts presented in the cases, that > there is no evidence that autism is caused by mercury. > > Jeff You not doc belive the CDC and the government. Only a brain wahed fool would beieve the lies of both. http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org/ Read them all. Here is just a few http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/071029_ThimerosalCausesMercuryPoisoning_XVI_RebutalToSufferTheLittleChildrenNoMore-b.pdf http://www.jpands.org/vol11no1/geier.pdf http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/080305_UpdtdRevu_Vaccns&Autsm_Myths&Miscncptns_DrNovllb.pdf http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/080127_PGKsrevu_VaccinationsAreStillNeededForKids_byMegFisher_b.pdf http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/071218_PGKrevuVaccinesAutism_MythsMisconceptionsByNovellaSb.pdf http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/071128_Reviewof_Parentaldilema_Togetkidsimmunizedornot_b.pdf
From: Jan Drew on 13 Mar 2010 19:47
On Mar 13, 11:12�am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 13, 8:15�am, Lefty <Jusle...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Mark Probert wrote: > > > On Mar 12, 5:41 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote: > > >> The court is right on this one. > > > >>http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-autism13-2010mar13,0,10037.... > > > > You have to read the decisions as I am doing. I am awed at the quality > > > of the analysis. Brilliant understanding of the science. I posted the > > > link to the three decisions earlier. > > > � Court, the place and people who accepted Mark as an attorney, one of > > their own. Why would any honest thinking person accept their "ruling"? > > Well, since you have not read the three decisions, and it would be > highly unlikely that you would understand them if you did, you would > not be an honest *****thinking***** person, as your "mind" is rock > solid closed. > > > Follow the money, it will lead you to truth. > > Not all the time. Forgot to read Torah again today. The love of money is the root of all evil. Diversion snpped. |