|
Prev: Acne Rosacea Straight Talk
Next: Another news story
From: alfred on 13 Jul 2008 21:29 True, because as a matter of fact, I ended up getting genital herpes type 1 when I was 27, and later genital herpes type 2 and oral herpes type 1 at the same time I got infected with the type 2 genitally. The second series of infections happened when I was about 39. Its more likely that you can get type 2 after getting type 1 then the other way around. Of course as we know with herpes there are no definites! I will say that when I got genital type one it was quite bothersome. With genital type 2 it was more frequent and more painful in terms of aching etc. The oral type one that i seemed to have gotten at 39 (unless i had it all along and it just came out then) was very mild, and I never got a cold sore aside from mild redness and tenderness on and around my lips. Hope this helps, Al "MamaZ" <mamazalama(a)msn.com> wrote in message news:0JSdk.15172$uE5.1261(a)flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com... > Hi, > This is so not true. It is entirely possible to get Herpes 2 in more than > one place at the same time: I know, because I have Herpes 2 genitally AND > on the palm of my hand (called Whitlow). > Any more questions? > mama z
From: M2slo2cht on 17 Jul 2008 19:58
Generally, when looking for a vaccine, you look for something predictable and reliable that works on as many people as possible. And although your proposal might "work" in a few cases, it could (probably) do more harm than good in many (maybe most) other cases. And there's no way to predict who would benefit and who would be harmed. M2 hot_chick1003 writes: >But I read that people who get Herpes 2 on their mouth don't get it on >their genitals and vice versa. So while it's not the most ideal >solution, it might be better than nothing if it was possible to infect >a small place on your arm or something and then cover it for weeks >until your body developed anti-bodies. This might be better then >getting a full blown case of it in the genital region. > >See: http://www.herpes.com/hsv1-2.html > >They might want to see if this sort of pseudo-vaccination works. The >same thing could be true for wart and cancer causing HPV. Couldn't >they just infect you with it in a place where you wouldn't get warts >or cancer, and then your body would develop anti-bodies, and then you >wouldn't be able to get oral, genital, or anal warts or cancer. |