The way you can Assess the Effectiveness of Depression Treatment
in [Depression]
|
Prev: The real-life Wall-E
Next: Hey Millie
From: CJ Dunnaway on 1 Aug 2008 15:45 "humble.life" <gn(a)t.com> wrote in message news:6fh3e6Fbfo70U5(a)mid.individual.net... > CJ Dunnaway wrote: >> "supporter" <abo_elyosr1986(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:2fd4b7c9-ad78-4ca3-b23c-fd1ff414f00b(a)f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> An Investigation From British Journal Of psychiatry >>> witch deal with the assessment of Depression Treatment >>> To Download The full Investigation : >>> >>> http://no4depression.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-to-assess-effictiveness-of.html >>> >>> Best Regards >> >> It all falls back to the nature vs. nurture argument, and it seems to >> be a variable mix of the two. I suspect the people more affected by >> their environment (nurturing) will respond better to counseling, >> while people affected more by brain chemistry (nature) will respond >> better to drug therapy. Still others will benefit most by a >> combination of the two therapies. Until we learn more, trial and >> error seems to be the best way to make that determination. >> >> CJ >> > > i agree with this, but some policies are being based on the current > research as if they purport a concrete and everlasting fact... I'll gladly trade with you. Most Americans ignore scientific evidence/theory and choose to remain ignorant and backward. It would be fantastic if we could have balanced reasoning.
From: humble.life on 1 Aug 2008 20:11 CJ Dunnaway wrote: > "humble.life" <gn(a)t.com> wrote in message > news:6fh3e6Fbfo70U5(a)mid.individual.net... >> CJ Dunnaway wrote: >>> "supporter" <abo_elyosr1986(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:2fd4b7c9-ad78-4ca3-b23c-fd1ff414f00b(a)f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >>> >>>> >>>> An Investigation From British Journal Of psychiatry >>>> witch deal with the assessment of Depression Treatment >>>> To Download The full Investigation : >>>> >>>> http://no4depression.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-to-assess-effictiveness-of.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards >>> >>> It all falls back to the nature vs. nurture argument, and it seems to >>> be a variable mix of the two. I suspect the people more affected by >>> their environment (nurturing) will respond better to counseling, >>> while people affected more by brain chemistry (nature) will respond >>> better to drug therapy. Still others will benefit most by a >>> combination of the two therapies. Until we learn more, trial and >>> error seems to be the best way to make that determination. >>> >>> CJ >>> >> >> i agree with this, but some policies are being based on the current >> research as if they purport a concrete and everlasting fact... > > > I'll gladly trade with you. Most Americans ignore scientific > evidence/theory and choose to remain ignorant and backward. It would be > fantastic if we could have balanced reasoning. > you miss my point. we have a government that chooses the blue-skies research, overly simplify the interpretations and implement policy according to those over-simplifications. which basically means that the people who fall out of the remit are trouble-makers, and are generally labeled as such.
From: Rowland McDonnell on 7 Aug 2008 11:45 supporter <abo_elyosr1986(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > An Investigation From British Journal Of psychiatry > witch deal with the assessment of Depression Treatment > To Download The full Investigation : > > http://no4depression.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-to-assess-effictiveness-of.html Please treat this with extreme caution. I decided to have a look at the Web page in question, using an odd browser with Javascript turned firmly off for the sake of security. (and don't forget peeps, like Whiskers I don't use Windoze and so like him I'm completely immune to almost all malicious Web page trickery[1]. It's probably a /very/ bad idea to look at that Web page on a Windoze box no matter what - although Opera is apparently pretty secure *if you turn Javascript off but not otherwise*. Don't even think about using MS Internet Exploder if you care about not having your computer taken over by criminals and used to send out spam and used to commit denial of service attacks and so on. Some people don't mind the idea that their computers are controlled by crooks doing things like that.) The Web page is written in the poor English I have come to associate with internet scammers. The `full research' is summarised on that Web page thus (I cannot reproduce the truly awful original layout here): ====================================================================== Summary � Depression is a biological disorder that is made worse by life stress. � Depression has characteristic symptoms that affect a person's thoughts feelings, and everyday functioning. � Antidepressant drugs help relieve some of the symptoms but take time t work. � You and your friends and family can help overcome depression by keepin busy, avoiding negative thinking, solving problems, and reducing stress. ====================================================================== Yes, well, I think we all know that and if we could do that, we wouldn't be here, would we? But has the author never met a spelling checker? Or been taught how to do punctuation? Or even understood that it's a good idea to check what he's written if he's going to stick it up on a Web page? For some reason it's impossible to download the `full Research in(PDF extension)' unless you have Javascript turned on. All the other Websites I know of that use Javascript to help with downloads offer a `click here if it doesn't work' option. Not in this case - you either open up a security hole by turning on Javascript, or you get nothing... And the page telling you to turn Javascript on is written in poor English, just like you'd expect from an internet scammer: "THIS PAGE NEEDS JAVASCRIPT, TO DISPLAY ALL INFORMATION CORRECT!" There is no information available via `About me' on the Web page linked to above. The author might well be honest and decent and genuinely trying to help - but I doubt it. There are big chunks of text about ADHD and alcohol depression - ripped off from elsewhere (but source cited - which isn't a bad sign at all, really). So: I'm no Web security expert, but I think that the maintainer of that Web page is up to no good and that it would be a good idea for no-one to visit that Web page - just to be on the safe side. Rowland. [1] And am I annoyingly smug about it? Well, yes. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: yasser mohamed on 6 Sep 2008 09:05 I think You Had a long long Time To curse Me And my homepage As well instead of to argue the research like others who already utilized my bad homepage as well ANY WAY I JUST HAVE SOME BRIEF ANSWERS .. I AM NOT A SCAMMER , I am Just A foreign post graduate student (AND THIS IS THE SECRET Behind MY BAD LANGUAGE) MY HOMEPAGE IS (.BLOGSPOT) SECURE ENOUGH that you can't allege it's BAD SECURE !!!!! JUST SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM with java script without accuse of the people you don't know about .. After All Thanks For Visiting My Simple Site url:http://myreader.co.uk/msg/119725253.aspx
From: Supporter on 6 Sep 2008 11:45
One thing else .. Didn't Your blind eyes notice that the entire site links are exact and real ? ?????????? which scamer would burn himself out for that You jarhead url:http://myreader.co.uk/msg/119725253.aspx |