Prev: Most flu shots contain mercury, but few know it
Next: origins of polio
From: Jan Drew on 21 Nov 2007 22:32

"Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:J_V0j.2877$7T.551(a)trndny09...
> drceephd(a)insightbb.com wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 2:56 pm, bigvince <Vince.Mirag...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> http://sayingnotovaccines.blogspot.com/2007/11/mandatory-vaccines-in-...
>>>
>>> Tuesday, November 20, 2007
>>> Mandatory Vaccination in Maryland REALLY IS about Money
>>> (from Dawn Richardson at PROVE (www.vaccineinfo.net)
>>>
>>> What could possibly be behind these forced vaccination? There are
>>> several factors that could be at play, but the primary suspicion that
>>> stands out in my mind is money. So I called the communications
>>> department of the Prince George's County School District to ask them
>>> specifically some questions about the amount of money the school
>>> district gets paid per child per day. They have not returned my call
>>> to answer the questions. Thankfully, the National Center for Education
>>> Statistics has some great information about Prince George's County
>>> Public Schools online available to the public to anyone with an
>>> internet connection! (http://nces.ed.gov/)
>>>
>>> According to this government website, in the 2006-2007 school year,
>>> Prince George's County Public Schools received $11,325 per student per
>>> year! That is more than I pay for my kid's private school tuition! The
>>> breakdown was 7% from federal money or $780, 46% from the state at
>>> $5246, and 47% from local revenue at $5298. Assuming a typical 180 day
>>> school year, that comes out to $63 per child per day of school
>>> attended.
>>>
>>> Why is this important information? If the Washington Post article is
>>> correct when they said that 2300 kids are being barred from school,
>>> all of a sudden $63 per student per day turns into a astronomical loss
>>> of $144,900 PER DAY for the school district. That would light a fire
>>> under anyone's backside to stop that hemorrhaging of loss of income,
>>> but it does not justify the way these families are being
>>> treated..........more at link
>>>
>>> Seems likely the two vaccines in question here are hep b and
>>> chickenpox heb b is almost impossible to spread in a school setting
>>> and chickenpox.......
>>>
>>> Thanks Vince
>>
>> Nice detective work Vince.
>
> That would be DEFECTIVE work.

To: countyexecutive(a)co.pg.md.us
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:48 PM
Subject: Mandatory Vaccinations


Dear Mr. Johnson:

Perhaps you might want to settle the problem you're having over forcing
parents to have their children injected with toxic vaccines by taking up the
offer below. After all, if people could see you, the County Executive,
swallowing that swill, they might be happy to comply with your stupid new
rule... and you could make yourself a lot of cash!

On the other hand, Sir, if you are not willing to swallow the vaccine
concoction as described, perhaps you might want to reconsider your stance on
mandatory vaccinations. Those proteins from the lung tissue of aborted
human fetuses would sort of make me gag, too. But if you don't want to
swallow them, you shouldn't be forcing other people to allow their children
to be assaulted with them (under threat of JAIL and FINES) either, right?

Come on, Mr. Johnson, be a trooper. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the
gander, isn't it? And in the army, isn't it a rule that no officer can
order a soldier to do something he himself would refuse?

If you don't come to the conclusion that your American rights and freedoms
INCLUDES the right to protect one's children from unwanted and ill-advised
medical treatments by FORCE, perhaps YOU ought to be held down and force-fed
this stuff!

Sincerely,
Dee Nicholson,
Freedom in Canadian Health Care
Toronto Canada



Drink your medicine, make $115,000!



OJAI, CA-On January 29, 2001, Jock Doubleday of Natural Woman, Natural Man,
Inc., offered $20,000 to the first U.S.-licensed medical doctor or
pharmaceutical company CEO to publicly drink a mixture of standard vaccine
additive ingredients:



The offer had no takers.



On August 1, 2006, Doubleday issued a press release announcing that the
offer had been increased to $75,000



The new offer also had no takers.



Therefore . . . as of June 1, 2007, the $75,000 vaccine offer was increased
to $80,000; as of July 1, 2007, the vaccine offer was increased to $85,000;
as of August 1, 2007, the offer was increased to $90,000; as of September 1,
2007, the offer was increased to $95,000; as of October 1, 2007, the offer
will increase to $100,000; as of November 1, 2007, the offer will increase
to $105,000; as of December 1, 2007, the offer will increase to $110,000; as
of January 1, 2008, the offer will increase to $115,000.



Doubleday has vowed to keep increasing the offer $5,000 per month, in
perpetuity, until an M.D., pharmaceutical company CEO, or any of the 14
relevant members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices agrees
to drink a body-weight calibrated dose of the vaccine additives MDs
routinely inject into children in the name of health.



This offer, dated April 25, 2007, has no expiration date unless and until
superseded by a similar offer of higher remuneration.



We suggest that anytime an M.D. publicly advocates childhood vaccinations-on
the radio, TV, in print or in person- that you mention Doubleday's offer.



The offer is available online at
http://www.spontaneouscreation.org/SC/$75,000VaccineOffer.htm

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Most flu shots contain mercury, but few know it
Next: origins of polio