The sad story of Esther Figueroa
in [Alternative]
|
From: Ilena Rose on 6 Aug 2006 22:20 Speaking of credibillity: Mark S Probert was disbarred by the NY Supreme Court and instead of admitting it ... compounded his lies with more lies: www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/PropagandistProbert.html and he claims that attorney Negrete's website: >A website run by...Timmy Bolen...who, IMNSHO, has no credibility. Three Appeals Court Judges wrote this about Stephen Barrett, the King of the Healthfrauds: " ... biased, and unworthy of credibility." More at: www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm
From: Jan Drew on 7 Aug 2006 01:38 "Imagine" <noheaven(a)nohell.com> Huh? > > "<BreastimplantAwareness.org> >" <<BIA(a)mundo.com> wrote in message > news:dbncd21bufnhs5if950s877uuu0j8k3gcc(a)4ax.com... >> Barrett's Parrot, disbarred former attorney Mark S Probert posted not >> the Court's Order ... but the plaintiff's allegations. >> >> I don't have access to her medical records, and would be very hesitant >> to believe Barrett/Probert ... Probert was disbarred by the NY Supreme >> Court and under oath, Barrett claimed that he had no recollection of >> "ever callilng anyone a Quack." >> >> So much for their dubious facts. >> >> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWAtch.htm >> >> I am of the opinion, that the mad Quackbuster Regime used Mrs Figueroa >> to attack Dr. Clark with yet another harassment suit. >> >> Putting an ill woman on the frontline of their Maniacal War is, worse >> than "sad." >> >> And using Christopher Grell in California???? >> >> More abuse on her! >> >> Grell (who I fully believe is the epitome of a Malicious Prosecutor) >> sued me for libel when I no knowledge of him. >> >> He was severly reprimanded in the Appeals Court as Judges look very >> sternly on attorney's filing frivilous suits ... especially when Grell >> was also a losing Plaintiff against me! >> >> He also sued me for being "in conspiracy" with people I had never >> heard of before. >> >> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackbustersVsIlena.htm >> >> >> >> http://healthfreedomlaw.com/ >> >> COURT ORDER THE FIGUEROAS ARE BARRED FROM TESTIFYING IN OWN CASE >> >> Upon a motion from one of the defendants based upon the Figueroas >> refusal to attend a deposition, the Court orders that they are barred >> from testifying at trial. >> >> The effect of this is that the Figueroas will not be allowed to >> testify at their own trial. All efforts to take their deposition and >> find out the merits, if any, of their case were refused by them and >> their counsel. >> >> COURT ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S TO FILE SECURITY >> >> Court finds that "...there is no reasonable possibility that >> Plaintiffs, ESTHER FIGUEROA and JOSE FIGUEROA will prevail in this >> action..." against Dr. Hulda Clark. The Court also orders that the >> Plaintiffs post $20,000.00 as security if they want to proceed with >> the case. The Figueroas fail to post the ordered security. >> >> >> FIGUEROAS'S ATTORNEYS WITHDRAW FROM CASE >> >> Attorney Christopher Grell and his law firm file a motion with the >> Court to be allowed to withdraw from the case. >> >> >> The motion is taken off calendar when the Figueroas terminate Grell's >> representation as their attorney. > > Huh? > >> >> >> >> > >
From: Jan Drew on 7 Aug 2006 02:03 "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:mIrBg.7758$gY6.6381(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > > "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message > news:5roBg.2753$3U4.23(a)fe12.lga... >> The sad story of Ester Figueroa, killed by Hulda Clark. Every false >> allegation against Dr. Barrett, and false claim made that Mrs. Figueroa >> had tried conventional medicine is addressed, AND REFUTED: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/34e39b95deb99973?hl=en& > > www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html > > OLD news. Bored--again Disbarred attorney. With an INSANE need to argue. >> >> http://tinyurl.com/eplna >> >> A summary of the case: >> >> You misunderstand. Mrs. Figueroa was a very ill woman who apparently >> tried >> Hulda Cure for All Diseases and was snot successful. Here is the true >> story: >> >> The civil case was filed by Esther and Jose Figueroa of New York City >> against Clark, the Dr. Clark Research Association, Century Nutrition, and >> several associated individuals. Mrs. Figueroa, who had been medically >> diagnosed with breast cancer, sought treatment in September 1998. The >> court >> papers state that she was told: >> >> Dust from her apartment was responsible for her breast cancer. >> Returning to her apartment would place her at special risk to develop >> leukemia because of her blood type. >> She had asbestos, lead, and a lot of copper in her system. >> The Syncrometer detected a parasite called "rabbit fluke" inside her >> breast. >> She also had E. coli, asbestos, and salmonella due to improper food >> sterilization. >> Several teeth should be removed and "cavitations" in her lower jaw should >> be >> scraped out. >> The suit also charged that: >> >> Clark subsequently arranged for all of Mrs. Figueroa's front and molar >> teeth >> to be removed, prescribed more than 30 dietary and herbal supplements to >> be >> taken during a 12-week period, and badly burned her breast while >> administering treatment with a "Zapper" device. >> >> During the 3-month period of treatment, the tumor increased from 1.5 cm >> to >> 14 cm. >> >> Despite this fact, Mrs. Figueroa was falsely told that she was getting >> better, that tests for "cancer markers" were negative, and that pain she >> was >> experiencing did not reflect persistence of her cancer. >> >> In 2001, the Figueroa family indicated to their attorney (Christopher >> Grell) >> that undergoing a deposition would be too stressful for Mrs. Figueroa. >> Mr. >> Grell therefore petitioned the court to withdraw from the case, and the >> case >> ended shortly afterward. One of the defendants (Self Health Resource >> Center, >> operated by Clark's son Geoffrey) then sued Grell and two associates for >> malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Grell responded with a motion >> to >> dismiss, which was granted and upheld on appeal, with an award of costs >> and >> attorneys fees to Grell. The Court of Appeal concluded: >> >> The evidence amply supports a reasonable belief on the part of these >> defendants [Grell and associates] that plaintiff [the Self Health >> Resource >> Center] was part of a network of persons and entities who acted >> recklessly, >> at best, luring Mrs. Figueroa into a bizarre, grotesque, and extremely >> expensive regimen of "alternative" cancer treatments which has no effect >> other than to exhaust the Figueroa's life savings and divert Mrs. >> Figueroa >> from conventional treatments, thereby reducing her prospects for recovery >> and survival [15]. >> >> 15. Sepulveda J. Decision of the Court of Appeal of the State of >> California,First Appellate District, Division Four, in Self Health >> Resource Center v Christopher Grell et al. A098285 (Alameda County >> Superior Court No. 2001-030441). Filed May 19, 2003. >> >> The case was eventually dismissed as Mrs. Figueroa was too ill to travel >> to court ordered depositions in California. Hulda's Henchmen had managed >> to drag the case out knowing that her medical condition would deteriorate >> to that point. >> >> If anyone claims that this is an innacurate summary, or that Mrs. >> Figueroa had tried conventional treatment before the quackery, they >> should be prepared to prove it. http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/Welcome%20Clark%20Fights%20Back%20-%20Figueroa%20Dismissed.htm http://www.savedrclark.net/by_whom.htm
From: Mark Probert on 7 Aug 2006 09:20 Mark Probert wrote: > The sad story of Ester Figueroa, killed by Hulda Clark. Every false > allegation against Dr. Barrett, and false claim made that Mrs. Figueroa > had tried conventional medicine is addressed, AND REFUTED: > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/34e39b95deb99973?hl=en& > > > http://tinyurl.com/eplna > > A summary of the case: > > You misunderstand. Mrs. Figueroa was a very ill woman who apparently tried > Hulda Cure for All Diseases and was snot successful. Here is the true > story: > > The civil case was filed by Esther and Jose Figueroa of New York City > against Clark, the Dr. Clark Research Association, Century Nutrition, and > several associated individuals. Mrs. Figueroa, who had been medically > diagnosed with breast cancer, sought treatment in September 1998. The court > papers state that she was told: > > Dust from her apartment was responsible for her breast cancer. > Returning to her apartment would place her at special risk to develop > leukemia because of her blood type. > She had asbestos, lead, and a lot of copper in her system. > The Syncrometer detected a parasite called "rabbit fluke" inside her > breast. > She also had E. coli, asbestos, and salmonella due to improper food > sterilization. > Several teeth should be removed and "cavitations" in her lower jaw > should be > scraped out. > The suit also charged that: > > Clark subsequently arranged for all of Mrs. Figueroa's front and molar > teeth > to be removed, prescribed more than 30 dietary and herbal supplements to be > taken during a 12-week period, and badly burned her breast while > administering treatment with a "Zapper" device. > > During the 3-month period of treatment, the tumor increased from 1.5 cm to > 14 cm. > > Despite this fact, Mrs. Figueroa was falsely told that she was getting > better, that tests for "cancer markers" were negative, and that pain she > was > experiencing did not reflect persistence of her cancer. > > In 2001, the Figueroa family indicated to their attorney (Christopher > Grell) > that undergoing a deposition would be too stressful for Mrs. Figueroa. Mr. > Grell therefore petitioned the court to withdraw from the case, and the > case > ended shortly afterward. One of the defendants (Self Health Resource > Center, > operated by Clark's son Geoffrey) then sued Grell and two associates for > malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Grell responded with a > motion to > dismiss, which was granted and upheld on appeal, with an award of costs and > attorneys fees to Grell. The Court of Appeal concluded: > > The evidence amply supports a reasonable belief on the part of these > defendants [Grell and associates] that plaintiff [the Self Health Resource > Center] was part of a network of persons and entities who acted recklessly, > at best, luring Mrs. Figueroa into a bizarre, grotesque, and extremely > expensive regimen of "alternative" cancer treatments which has no effect > other than to exhaust the Figueroa's life savings and divert Mrs. Figueroa > from conventional treatments, thereby reducing her prospects for recovery > and survival [15]. > > 15. Sepulveda J. Decision of the Court of Appeal of the State of > California,First Appellate District, Division Four, in Self Health > Resource Center v Christopher Grell et al. A098285 (Alameda County > Superior Court No. 2001-030441). Filed May 19, 2003. > > The case was eventually dismissed as Mrs. Figueroa was too ill to travel > to court ordered depositions in California. Hulda's Henchmen had managed > to drag the case out knowing that her medical condition would > deteriorate to that point. > > If anyone claims that this is an innacurate summary, or that Mrs. > Figueroa had tried conventional treatment before the quackery, they > should be prepared to prove it. After I have carefully reviewed the BolenBilge website, I have yet to find one word that refutes my summary. That website consists of personal attacks on Attorney Grell and NO facts that refute what I summarized. To be able to refute my summary, an intelligent person would have to use the court documents and/or a time line of all events.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: President Carter: BushCo a disaster even for Israel Next: The sad story of Esther Figueroa |