The sad story of Esther Figueroa
in [Alternative]
|
From: " BreastimplantAwareness.org>" on 6 Aug 2006 17:23 Barrett's Parrot, disbarred former attorney Mark S Probert posted not the Court's Order ... but the plaintiff's allegations. I don't have access to her medical records, and would be very hesitant to believe Barrett/Probert ... Probert was disbarred by the NY Supreme Court and under oath, Barrett claimed that he had no recollection of "ever callilng anyone a Quack." So much for their dubious facts. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWAtch.htm I am of the opinion, that the mad Quackbuster Regime used Mrs Figueroa to attack Dr. Clark with yet another harassment suit. Putting an ill woman on the frontline of their Maniacal War is, worse than "sad." And using Christopher Grell in California???? More abuse on her! Grell (who I fully believe is the epitome of a Malicious Prosecutor) sued me for libel when I no knowledge of him. He was severly reprimanded in the Appeals Court as Judges look very sternly on attorney's filing frivilous suits ... especially when Grell was also a losing Plaintiff against me! He also sued me for being "in conspiracy" with people I had never heard of before. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackbustersVsIlena.htm http://healthfreedomlaw.com/ COURT ORDER THE FIGUEROAS ARE BARRED FROM TESTIFYING IN OWN CASE Upon a motion from one of the defendants based upon the Figueroas refusal to attend a deposition, the Court orders that they are barred from testifying at trial. The effect of this is that the Figueroas will not be allowed to testify at their own trial. All efforts to take their deposition and find out the merits, if any, of their case were refused by them and their counsel. COURT ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S TO FILE SECURITY Court finds that "...there is no reasonable possibility that Plaintiffs, ESTHER FIGUEROA and JOSE FIGUEROA will prevail in this action..." against Dr. Hulda Clark. The Court also orders that the Plaintiffs post $20,000.00 as security if they want to proceed with the case. The Figueroas fail to post the ordered security. FIGUEROAS'S ATTORNEYS WITHDRAW FROM CASE Attorney Christopher Grell and his law firm file a motion with the Court to be allowed to withdraw from the case. The motion is taken off calendar when the Figueroas terminate Grell's representation as their attorney.
From: Imagine on 6 Aug 2006 18:26 "<BreastimplantAwareness.org> >" <<BIA(a)mundo.com> wrote in message news:dbncd21bufnhs5if950s877uuu0j8k3gcc(a)4ax.com... > Barrett's Parrot, disbarred former attorney Mark S Probert posted not > the Court's Order ... but the plaintiff's allegations. > > I don't have access to her medical records, and would be very hesitant > to believe Barrett/Probert ... Probert was disbarred by the NY Supreme > Court and under oath, Barrett claimed that he had no recollection of > "ever callilng anyone a Quack." > > So much for their dubious facts. > > www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWAtch.htm > > I am of the opinion, that the mad Quackbuster Regime used Mrs Figueroa > to attack Dr. Clark with yet another harassment suit. > > Putting an ill woman on the frontline of their Maniacal War is, worse > than "sad." > > And using Christopher Grell in California???? > > More abuse on her! > > Grell (who I fully believe is the epitome of a Malicious Prosecutor) > sued me for libel when I no knowledge of him. > > He was severly reprimanded in the Appeals Court as Judges look very > sternly on attorney's filing frivilous suits ... especially when Grell > was also a losing Plaintiff against me! > > He also sued me for being "in conspiracy" with people I had never > heard of before. > > www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackbustersVsIlena.htm > > > > http://healthfreedomlaw.com/ > > COURT ORDER THE FIGUEROAS ARE BARRED FROM TESTIFYING IN OWN CASE > > Upon a motion from one of the defendants based upon the Figueroas > refusal to attend a deposition, the Court orders that they are barred > from testifying at trial. > > The effect of this is that the Figueroas will not be allowed to > testify at their own trial. All efforts to take their deposition and > find out the merits, if any, of their case were refused by them and > their counsel. > > COURT ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S TO FILE SECURITY > > Court finds that "...there is no reasonable possibility that > Plaintiffs, ESTHER FIGUEROA and JOSE FIGUEROA will prevail in this > action..." against Dr. Hulda Clark. The Court also orders that the > Plaintiffs post $20,000.00 as security if they want to proceed with > the case. The Figueroas fail to post the ordered security. > > > FIGUEROAS'S ATTORNEYS WITHDRAW FROM CASE > > Attorney Christopher Grell and his law firm file a motion with the > Court to be allowed to withdraw from the case. > > > The motion is taken off calendar when the Figueroas terminate Grell's > representation as their attorney. Huh? > > > >
From: Mark Probert on 6 Aug 2006 20:22 Imagine wrote: >> Putting an ill woman on the frontline of their Maniacal War is, worse >> than "sad." >> >> And using Christopher Grell in California???? >> >> More abuse on her! >> >> Grell (who I fully believe is the epitome of a Malicious Prosecutor) >> sued me for libel when I no knowledge of him. >> >> He was severly reprimanded in the Appeals Court as Judges look very >> sternly on attorney's filing frivilous suits ... especially when Grell >> was also a losing Plaintiff against me! >> >> He also sued me for being "in conspiracy" with people I had never >> heard of before. >> >> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackbustersVsIlena.htm >> >> http://healthfreedomlaw.com/ A website run by...Timmy Bolen...who, IMNSHO, has no credibility. >> >> COURT ORDER THE FIGUEROAS ARE BARRED FROM TESTIFYING IN OWN CASE >> >> Upon a motion from one of the defendants based upon the Figueroas >> refusal to attend a deposition, the Court orders that they are barred >> from testifying at trial. >> >> The effect of this is that the Figueroas will not be allowed to >> testify at their own trial. All efforts to take their deposition and >> find out the merits, if any, of their case were refused by them and >> their counsel. Spinning...Bolen's expertise....she could not handle a cross country trip since the defendants had drawn out the proceedings to the point where they knew she would be too sick to travel. Mrs. Figueroa had NO CHOICE but had to sue Hulda Clark in California since Clark had no personal connection with New York. >> COURT ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S TO FILE SECURITY >> >> Court finds that "...there is no reasonable possibility that >> Plaintiffs, ESTHER FIGUEROA and JOSE FIGUEROA will prevail in this >> action..." against Dr. Hulda Clark. The Court also orders that the >> Plaintiffs post $20,000.00 as security if they want to proceed with >> the case. The Figueroas fail to post the ordered security. Of course they could not post it. The woman had given Hulda Clark all of her money, and she was too sick to work. >> FIGUEROAS'S ATTORNEYS WITHDRAW FROM CASE >> >> Attorney Christopher Grell and his law firm file a motion with the >> Court to be allowed to withdraw from the case. >> >> >> The motion is taken off calendar when the Figueroas terminate Grell's >> representation as their attorney. > > Huh? Grell practices in California, the Figueroa's reside in New York. Mrs. Figueroa became too ill to attend court ordered discovery IN CALIFORNIA where Hulda Clark resided, thus making it impossible for her case to continue, since her testimony was necessary. Grell was forced to withdraw.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: 'the MMR10'. Next: President Carter: BushCo a disaster even for Israel |