From: Jan Drew on

"Rich" <joshew(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:m3lRg.11157$rE5.10115(a)tornado.socal.rr.com...
>
> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:sZkRg.3961$vJ2.664(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>
>>>
>>> Yawn. It was a good story. Period.
>>
>> No, it was a anecdote.
>>
>> According to you anecdotes are bullshit and prove nothing.
>
> That's the point, idiot. Mark was not trying to prove anything. Anecdotes
> held forth as proof are bullshit. That doesn't mean that anecdotes cannot
> be shared with the group.

Have you noticed, you follow my posts when I show Mark's being a hypocrite?
You have added yet another additon to YOUR meaning of anecdotes.
>
>> Keep on making a complete fool of yourself, Mark.
>
> YOU are the fool here, Jan.

lol. YOU are a fool for posting SPAM and LIES under your name.
>
> --
>
>
> --Rich
>


From: Jan Drew on

"Sumbuny" <Sumbuny(a)THISSHOULDBEGONEcox.net> wrote in message
news:spERg.1341$Rp3.1000(a)dukeread12...
>
> "Vernon" <athere(a)athere> wrote in message
> news:4515cb06$0$23828$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com...
>>
>> "Sumbuny" <Sumbuny(a)THISSHOULDBEGONEcox.net> wrote in message
>> news:NcjRg.1294$Rp3.781(a)dukeread12...
>>>
>>> "Vernon" <athere(a)athere> wrote in message
>>> news:45140cd0$0$23894$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Sumbuny" <Sumbuny(a)THISSHOULDBEGONEcox.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:KMEQg.71$Rp3.63(a)dukeread12...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:wPdQg.3212$Se.671(a)trndny03...
>>>>>> http://www.adderallxr.com/ty/ty_story/
>>>>>
>>>>> No surprise there...I suspected he was ADHD since he was on "Trading
>>>>> Spaces"...the fact that he "came out" about it was brave, since so
>>>>> many who have it do not want other to know about it, fearing that it
>>>>> will harm their careers...a shame, really.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Buny
>>>>>
>>>>> " Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to
>>>>> be normal."
>>>>> ~ Albert Camus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most who have the imaginary "it" don't know they have "it" and just get
>>>> on with their lives knowing that no two people are alike and REFUSE to
>>>> take drugs to become an automon or programmed personality that fits
>>>> some imaginary standard.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, there are people who ACTUALLY like who they are. Then there are
>>>> the druggies and alcoholics.
>>>
>>> Perfect example...if I said I had ADHD, would you say the same thing
>>> about me as well?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Buny
>>
>> If you said it, you would be wrong, absolutely convinced and possibly
>> under some treatment, but wrong.
>
> ...and if I told you that my treatment involved such non-medicinal things
> as seen here? http://www.ldonline.org/article/8797?theme=print

Teachers have NO business to instruct children about ADHD.

>
> Interesting that people automatically jump to the wrong conclusions on
> limited information....a diagnosis given to clarify a problem, so that
> interventions can be found...preferable the *Least Restrictive
> Environment* (special ed keywords--but they can also apply
> medically--consider this *Least Invasive*)....
>
> You assUmed medication ......
>
> If I told you I had ADHD, and that these non-medicinal environmental- and
> behavioral-modification techniques were effective...what would you then
> say?
>
>
>
> --
> Buny
>
> " Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be
> normal."
> ~ Albert Camus
>
>


From: Rich on

"Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bDJRg.4417$TV3.3703(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Rich" <joshew(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:m3lRg.11157$rE5.10115(a)tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>
>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:sZkRg.3961$vJ2.664(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>>
>>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>>> Yawn. It was a good story. Period.
>>>
>>> No, it was a anecdote.
>>>
>>> According to you anecdotes are bullshit and prove nothing.
>>
>> That's the point, idiot. Mark was not trying to prove anything. Anecdotes
>> held forth as proof are bullshit. That doesn't mean that anecdotes cannot
>> be shared with the group.
>
> Have you noticed, you follow my posts when I show Mark's being a
> hypocrite?
> You have added yet another additon to YOUR meaning of anecdotes.

Mark and I did not invent the meaning of "anecdotes." An anecdote is an
anecdote. But there is a difference between an anecdote used to support
scientific claims and an anecdote merely used to share information of
interest. The fact that you cannot understand that difference, and keep
demonstrating your ignorance that there even is a difference is your own
misfortune and foolishness.


>>
>>> Keep on making a complete fool of yourself, Mark.
>>
>> YOU are the fool here, Jan.
>
> lol. YOU are a fool for posting SPAM and LIES under your name.

No spam. No lies. That's just another example of your stupid and stubborn
lack of understanding of the English language. You still need that remedial
English course, Jan.
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


From: Rich on

"Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:PJJRg.4418$TV3.1714(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Sumbuny" <Sumbuny(a)THISSHOULDBEGONEcox.net> wrote in message
> news:spERg.1341$Rp3.1000(a)dukeread12...
>>
>> "Vernon" <athere(a)athere> wrote in message
>> news:4515cb06$0$23828$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com...
>>>
>>> "Sumbuny" <Sumbuny(a)THISSHOULDBEGONEcox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:NcjRg.1294$Rp3.781(a)dukeread12...
>>>>
>>>> "Vernon" <athere(a)athere> wrote in message
>>>> news:45140cd0$0$23894$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Sumbuny" <Sumbuny(a)THISSHOULDBEGONEcox.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:KMEQg.71$Rp3.63(a)dukeread12...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:wPdQg.3212$Se.671(a)trndny03...
>>>>>>> http://www.adderallxr.com/ty/ty_story/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No surprise there...I suspected he was ADHD since he was on "Trading
>>>>>> Spaces"...the fact that he "came out" about it was brave, since so
>>>>>> many who have it do not want other to know about it, fearing that it
>>>>>> will harm their careers...a shame, really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Buny
>>>>>>
>>>>>> " Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to
>>>>>> be normal."
>>>>>> ~ Albert Camus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Most who have the imaginary "it" don't know they have "it" and just
>>>>> get on with their lives knowing that no two people are alike and
>>>>> REFUSE to take drugs to become an automon or programmed personality
>>>>> that fits some imaginary standard.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, there are people who ACTUALLY like who they are. Then there are
>>>>> the druggies and alcoholics.
>>>>
>>>> Perfect example...if I said I had ADHD, would you say the same thing
>>>> about me as well?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Buny
>>>
>>> If you said it, you would be wrong, absolutely convinced and possibly
>>> under some treatment, but wrong.
>>
>> ...and if I told you that my treatment involved such non-medicinal things
>> as seen here? http://www.ldonline.org/article/8797?theme=print
>
> Teachers have NO business to instruct children about ADHD.
>


What an incredibly stupid comment! First of all, the article is about
instructing children who HAVE ADHD, not instructing children ABOUT ADHD.
(More evidence of your poor reading comprehension skills.) Second, teachers
are very much in the business of instructing children about anything and
everything, and certainly ADHD is a subject that children should know more
about, since they are interacting daily with ADHD fellow students. Third,
YOU have no business telling teachers what they should teach.
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/


From: Jan Drew on

"Rich" <joshew(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:iKJRg.6773$%i.1452(a)tornado.socal.rr.com...
>
> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:bDJRg.4417$TV3.3703(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Rich" <joshew(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:m3lRg.11157$rE5.10115(a)tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>
>>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>> news:sZkRg.3961$vJ2.664(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yawn. It was a good story. Period.
>>>>
>>>> No, it was a anecdote.
>>>>
>>>> According to you anecdotes are bullshit and prove nothing.
>>>
>>> That's the point, idiot. Mark was not trying to prove anything.
>>> Anecdotes held forth as proof are bullshit. That doesn't mean that
>>> anecdotes cannot be shared with the group.
>>
>> Have you noticed, you follow my posts when I show Mark's being a
>> hypocrite?
>> You have added yet another additon to YOUR meaning of anecdotes.
>
> Mark and I did not invent the meaning of "anecdotes." An anecdote is an
> anecdote. But there is a difference between an anecdote used to support
> scientific claims and an anecdote merely used to share information of
> interest. The fact that you cannot understand that difference, and keep
> demonstrating your ignorance that there even is a difference is your own
> misfortune and foolishness.

I did not say *invent*. Mark most definitely posted his remarks to a poster
who
was sharing a personal story. Then he changed it to fit his own of like
kind. He also
psoted personal experience does not count in this regard.. Mark is a proven
liar,
filthy mouthed, etc., etc. Accusing others of his own exact guilt.

Like YOU.
>
>
>>>
>>>> Keep on making a complete fool of yourself, Mark.
>>>
>>> YOU are the fool here, Jan.
>>
>> lol. YOU are a fool for posting SPAM and LIES under your name.
>
> No spam. No lies. That's just another example of your stupid and stubborn
> lack of understanding of the English language. You still need that
> remedial English course, Jan.

LOL! You are such a liar. Using the same tactics as
Rosalind/akacathy/Stella.
> --
>
>
> --Rich