From: PeterB - Original on
On Jan 30, 2:27 pm, Peter Parry <pe...(a)> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:07:38 -0800 (PST), PeterB - Original
> <p...(a)> wrote:
> >On Jan 26, 7:32 am, Peter Parry <pe...(a)> wrote:
> >> I'm not sure what you mean by "natural" medicine.  The is nothing
> >> remotely  "natural" about the chemical reactions and industrial
> >> processes used by the major nutricutical manufacturers to manufacture
> >> their various offerings.  
> >I am not referring to synthetic vitamins as they are not naturally
> >occurring, but to actual food-based nutrition as "natural medicine."
> My apologies if I have misunderstood you, unfortunately many pill
> pushers refer to their products as "natural" or "food supplements"  If
> you are arguing for a balanced diet then on that at least we are in
> agreement.

Your many evasions are amusing. I would not be arguing for a
"balanced diet" in poverty-wracked third world regions lacking self-
supporting agriculture or the infrastructure to bring it about. The
poor in those regions are so far from having *food* that to speak of
them having a "balanced diet" is obscene. So, I am not referring to
"balanced diet" when referring to "natural medicine," but to food-
based dietary supplements whose food content is encapsulated and
easily transported to the poor.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Prev: Mark Robert Thorson
Next: Religious information