From: Happy Oyster on
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:29:04 -0700 (PDT), Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote:

>On Sep 9, 5:06?pm, Mark Thorson <nos...(a)sonic.net> wrote:
>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>
>> > On Sep 8, 7:14 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...(a)sonic.net> wrote:
>> > > Hulda Clark was a fraud who sent many patients
>> > > to an early or unnecessary death, by promoting
>> > > her self-invented practices which she knew were
>> > > ineffective. She killed people for her own profit.
>> > > She was a monster.
>>
>> > >http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clarkaff/huf...
>>
>> > Quack Quack is a well know liar, as in Mark Thorson.
>>
>> You always call people liars just for disagreeing
>> with you.
>
>Quite wrong. I call lies when they are lies, and unlike you I prove
>them.


To prove that Jan Drew is a liar is no problem. It was done uncounted time
already. But Jan Drew kee
There is one case, which enlightens th whole situation: Jan Drew is too damned
stupid to even count to 2.

Look at what happened here:

First, to make the references, the post with the important lines of the header:


<quote>
From: Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com>
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med.nursing
Subject: Re: Offit's Failure to Disclose Jeopardizes Swine Flu Vaccine Program
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <74312d7f-3683-410d-a86c-702b12a617f4(a)o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <n9SdncQtco_hBDvXnZ2dnUVZ8lOdnZ2d(a)bt.com>
<11f77dc1-9691-485e-839d-78cf7a0cba32(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
<ff014b16-7a16-4235-9c83-a392be18d289(a)z24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
<0fa34871-8f87-46d9-8837-bdfc0b029133(a)q35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.116.65;
posting-account=40HPKQoAAABwSFWWdvGlBjB7F-dFMkyi


On Sep 8, 8:53=EF=BF=BDpm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2:42=EF=BF=BDpm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 8, 2:38 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 8, 1:51 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Doctor Who Made Millions Off MMR Manufacturer Does Not Tell Public =
of His
> > > > Financial Relationship during NBC Dateline Broadcasthttp://www.reut=
ers.com/article/pressRelease/idUS106778+08-Sep-2009+PR...
>
> > Once again Mark S Probert shows his dishonesty.
>
> There was nothing dishonest in what I said. They are known anti-vac
> liars.

Other's don't hear what other's say.

They do read what they post.

Like I posted once again you show your dishonesty.
And....here you post another blatant lie.


On Sep 8, 2:38 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:


> On Sep 8, 1:51 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:

> > Doctor Who Made Millions Off MMR Manufacturer Does Not Tell Public of H=
is
> > Financial Relationship during NBC Dateline Broadcasthttp://www.reuters.=
com/article/pressRelease/idUS106778+08-Sep-2009+PR...



Once again Mark S Probert shows his dishonesty.

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS106778+08-Sep-2009+PR...

</quote>



This is what Jan Drew wrote:

<quote>
Other's don't hear what other's say.

They do read what they post.

Like I posted once again you show your dishonesty.
And....here you post another blatant lie.
</quote>


Great, isn't it? Because we have an other case, yes I mean this:


On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:23:56 -0700 (PDT), Jan Drew <drewjan43(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>> Well, Jan Drew, a person who is too stupid to count to 2, talks about lies...?
>
>That another lie and insult. The fact is Mark Probert posted his age
>as 11/26.

Please, note this sentence:

>I have proven he used 1946 in his email address.
*************************************************

>2009-1946 = 63. On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64.

Several times already I posted a timeline of events. I do it again now,
including the basic develoments first:


On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:11:53 -0400, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>"Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:e5d4c9a4-edb6-429e-a95f-9b7fef936df5(a)y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>On Jul 9, 8:51 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:rzd5m.6677$kA.770(a)nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Posted that Noah his son's birthday was 11/26/96 (my birthday).
>>
>> > He has numerous posts that are Mark Probert 1...(a)hotmail.com
>>
>> > 2009- 1946 = 64 -in November. My math is not wrong.
>>
>> > Thus, Mark S Probert is a liar.
>
>Since November 2009 is in the future, I will not be 63 until then.
>
>You are amazingly stupid.
>
>November 26th 2009 is in 2009.
>2009-1946 YOU will be 64, not 63. You are 63 now. On November 26, 2009 you
>will be 64.
>Period.
>
>Thanks for proving you are a liar again.
>And, I am correct. You and you alone posted your birthday.


To make things a bit easier to see, this is a table of events.

A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on

26.11.1946 born
26.11.1947 1 year old
26.11.1948 2 years old
26.11.1949 3 years old
26.11.1950 4 years old
26.11.1951 5 years old
26.11.1952 6 years old
26.11.1953 7 years old
26.11.1954 8 years old
26.11.1955 9 years old
26.11.1956 10 years old
26.11.1957 11 years old
26.11.1958 12 years old
26.11.1959 13 years old
26.11.1960 14 years old
26.11.1961 15 years old
26.11.1962 16 years old
26.11.1963 17 years old
26.11.1964 18 years old
26.11.1965 19 years old
26.11.1966 20 years old
26.11.1967 21 years old
26.11.1968 22 years old
26.11.1969 23 years old
26.11.1970 24 years old
26.11.1971 25 years old
26.11.1972 26 years old
26.11.1973 27 years old
26.11.1974 28 years old
26.11.1975 29 years old
26.11.1976 30 years old
26.11.1977 31 years old
26.11.1978 32 years old
26.11.1979 33 years old
26.11.1980 34 years old
26.11.1981 35 years old
26.11.1982 36 years old
26.11.1983 37 years old
26.11.1984 38 years old
26.11.1985 39 years old
26.11.1986 40 years old
26.11.1987 41 years old
26.11.1988 42 years old
26.11.1989 43 years old
26.11.1990 44 years old
26.11.1991 45 years old
26.11.1992 46 years old
26.11.1993 47 years old
26.11.1994 48 years old
26.11.1995 49 years old
26.11.1996 50 years old
26.11.1997 51 years old
26.11.1998 52 years old
26.11.1999 53 years old
26.11.2000 54 years old
26.11.2001 55 years old
26.11.2002 56 years old
26.11.2003 57 years old
26.11.2004 58 years old
26.11.2005 59 years old
26.11.2006 60 years old
26.11.2007 61 years old
26.11.2008 62 years old
26.11.2009 63 years old
************************
26.11.2010 64 years old


On the 26.11. 2009 that person WILL BECOME 63 years old!
********************************************************

But, see above, Jan Drew still insists:

>2009-1946 = 63. On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64.


Now, a person born on 26.11. 1946 is on the very day "26.11.1946" BORN.

1 year later it will be 1 year old:

26.11.1947 1 year old

According to my timeline at 26.11.2009 it will be 63 years old.

But Jan Drew insists on

"On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64."


An other thing to note: Jan Drew calls Hulda Clark a friend and praises her.
Hulda Clark is a criminal.

--
**** WARNING **** The web-hoster Globat.com steals money from your
credit card account. If you are a customer of Globat.com, never give
them any credit card information. If you can't erase the information,
then do delete the old card and get a new one! **** WARNING ****
From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <14f0c862-7c97-4ce3-89c8-0e34d4a72701(a)p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, Mark Probert wrote:

> I was never fan of Clark, but, putting yourself into her obituary is
> offensive.

Well, I suppose that depends on the role one plays.

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+

From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 10, 11:23 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:

> Then, I'll try to foget what you posted about MichealJackson.
> Evidently you are prejudiced against Afro-Americans.

Wrong. I said that Michael Jackson was a child molestor not because he
is African-American, but because he is a CHILD MOLESTOR.

I do not give a cleanse if he was ROY G BIV, as race, ethnicity,
gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc. etc. etc. does not play a
part in my thinking processes, AS IT DOES YOURS.

This stupid comment of yours (I did not call you stupid) proves that
you have these things in your mind.

From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 12, 5:24 pm, Ilena Rose <B...(a)mundo.com> wrote:


> One small note ... Dr. Clark was 80 when she passed away.

Proof that the good die young.
From: Peter B. on

"Ilena Rose" <BIA(a)mundo.com> wrote in message
news:6b4oa558i1rqrkj6q66aqst4jg0d1e9fla(a)4ax.com...
> What horrid people Stephen Barrett & his ugly flacks are here on
> Usenet ... continuing Barrett's years of harassment and defamation and
> lies and attacks. German Deckers shows how desperate they are.
>

What a sad person you are using the old bag to further you self
interests, aligning yourself with her in death where she cannot respond
as to just how she disagrees with you.

Are you so desperate that you need to post under her name all the while
touting your goals and self pity trips. You are as sad as that other old
bag Jan.