|
Prev: LIL FLIRT - THE AFTERPARTY - 9 August 2008
Next: LIL FLIRT - THE AFTERPARTY - 9 August 2008 (UK)
From: Mal on 5 Aug 2008 20:31 or something even worse. Hang on, am I an animal or not? -- Mal The first word I type in any message, has only a half chance of being true. Anything that follows, is anybody's guess.
From: Evil_Nigel on 9 Aug 2008 16:37 x-no-archive: yes On Aug 9, 12:59 am, "CJ Dunnaway" <cj_dunnaway-n...(a)yaWHOhoo.com> wrote: > > Thank goodness we aren't animals or we'd be bred for beauty like we > breed dogs. But we don't breed dogs for beauty - we breed them for obscenity. We take a characteristic that appeals to the human eye and we breed it to ridiculous proportions, so most if not all dog breeds have associated genetic defects. If would be like breeding women to have zzz cup breasts, or Chinese to have luminescent day-glo yellow skin. > Hang on, we don't breed people for beauty - do we? If you take the hereditary peers in our House of Lords, we Brits breed for extreme ugliness. Evil Nigel
From: nigel on 19 Aug 2008 08:08 x-no-archive: yes Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk wrote: > x-no-archive: yes > > On Aug 9, 12:59 am, "CJ Dunnaway" <cj_dunnaway-n...(a)yaWHOhoo.com> > wrote: > >>Thank goodness we aren't animals or we'd be bred for beauty like we >>breed dogs. > > > But we don't breed dogs for beauty - we breed them for obscenity. We > take a characteristic that appeals to the human eye and we breed it to > ridiculous proportions, so most if not all dog breeds have associated > genetic defects. If would be like breeding women to have zzz cup > breasts, or Chinese to have luminescent day-glo yellow skin. > My tabloid du jour reports on a BBC documentary (no broadcast date mentioned) about the problems of genetic defects in dogs due to inbreeding. There are two graphic examples of how the shape of dogs has changed over the years with comparison pictures of a dachshund now and 100 years ago (when it could actually function as a dog) and a bassett now and 60 years ago. There was a ridiculous soundbite quote from the Kennel Club (surely one of the worst governing bodies of any hobby): "We will go on working for the benefit of pedigree dogs". Evil Nigel
From: CJ Dunnaway on 19 Aug 2008 10:13 "nigel" <useweb(a)nospam.com> wrote in message news:g8ed4h$h1l$1(a)aioe.org... > x-no-archive: yes > > Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk wrote: > >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On Aug 9, 12:59 am, "CJ Dunnaway" <cj_dunnaway-n...(a)yaWHOhoo.com> >> wrote: >> >>>Thank goodness we aren't animals or we'd be bred for beauty like we >>>breed dogs. >> >> >> But we don't breed dogs for beauty - we breed them for obscenity. We >> take a characteristic that appeals to the human eye and we breed it >> to >> ridiculous proportions, so most if not all dog breeds have associated >> genetic defects. If would be like breeding women to have zzz cup >> breasts, or Chinese to have luminescent day-glo yellow skin. >> > > My tabloid du jour reports on a BBC documentary (no broadcast date > mentioned) about the problems of genetic defects in dogs due to > inbreeding. There are two graphic examples of how the shape of dogs > has changed over the years with comparison pictures of a dachshund now > and 100 years ago (when it could actually function as a dog) and a > bassett now and 60 years ago. > > There was a ridiculous soundbite quote from the Kennel Club (surely > one of the worst governing bodies of any hobby): "We will go on > working for the benefit of pedigree dogs". > > Evil Nigel > I suspect it is the beginning of the end for them. The PETA people will be hounding them to death. :) CJ
From: Evil_Nigel on 19 Aug 2008 10:25 x-no-archive: yes On Aug 19, 3:13 pm, "CJ Dunnaway" <cj_dunnaway-n...(a)yaWHOhoo.com> wrote: > "nigel" <use...(a)nospam.com> wrote in message > > > > My tabloid du jour reports on a BBC documentary (no broadcast date > > mentioned) about the problems of genetic defects in dogs due to > > inbreeding. There are two graphic examples of how the shape of dogs > > has changed over the years with comparison pictures of a dachshund now > > and 100 years ago (when it could actually function as a dog) and a > > bassett now and 60 years ago. > > > There was a ridiculous soundbite quote from the Kennel Club (surely > > one of the worst governing bodies of any hobby): "We will go on > > working for the benefit of pedigree dogs". > > > Evil Nigel > > I suspect it is the beginning of the end for them. The PETA people will > be hounding them to death. :) > > CJ I broadly support the aims of PETA, but it seems to me that membership is rather like a fashion accessory or a career move - one month a fashion model will be on the billboards on their behalf proclaiming that she'd rather go naked than wear fur, next month she'll be sashaying down a red carpet swathed in dead animals. Evil Nigel
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: LIL FLIRT - THE AFTERPARTY - 9 August 2008 Next: LIL FLIRT - THE AFTERPARTY - 9 August 2008 (UK) |