|
From: howzyou on 19 Oct 2007 16:36 I called some places in Vancouver, Canada and they said that if I saw a gastroentrologist and tested me for acid reflux they would do an EGD which means endoscopy, biopsy and maybe a breath test. Is this enough? Also they dont do the pH testing anymore. Do you think I would be examined thoroughly enough? I would get my throat checked by an ENT specialist first for the referral. And try to get it all done in 10 days to two weeks. I would be pay cash as I am visiting.
From: howzyou on 19 Oct 2007 19:20 Really, why not? If you get the referral you are paying money because it is private, why wouldnt they be able to set you up with a gastroentrologist? He could do the EGD and biopsy really soon, right? What about any other tests whatever they might be, how long would they take?
From: H McCollister on 20 Oct 2007 10:55 In article <1192836002.227295.180530(a)v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, howzyou(a)yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Really, why not? If you get the referral you are paying money because > it is private, why wouldnt they be able to set you up with a > gastroentrologist? He could do the EGD and biopsy really soon, > right? What about any other tests whatever they might be, how long > would they take? That's the point... those "other tests, whatever they might be" covers a lot of ground. What tests are you going to need? What's their schedule look like? When's their next opening for any or all of those tests? What's their backlog? Canadian medicine has relatively limited resources and there's a waiting list for access to most of them. Maybe they'll squeeze a private pay patient to the front of the line, but if I were a Canadian with GERD, paying 55% marginal tax bracket and 24% VAT on every purchase I made in order to support the Canadian health system, I'd be pretty pissed if they jumped someone in line ahead of me. The length of time necessary to complete a GERD workup is a question you should ask the people you talked to. Most likely, the answer will be "it depends...". These things vary so much from institution to institution, there's no way anyone here could begin to guess how that particular institution will be able to fit you in. HMc
From: Peter on 20 Oct 2007 18:49 turn. (I would probably not be able to buy insurance if I lived > permanently in the U.S. -- because of my health issues - age, gerd, > hbp, Did you mean BPH Mel :-) cholesterol, glaucoma, etc)). So, because of our Canadian system > I'm able to save up my pension money and spend it in your fine > country this winter. > -Mel Smith (leaving in two weeks for Arizona for the winter)
From: Mel Smith on 20 Oct 2007 20:11 Peter said: > > Did you mean BPH Mel :-) Peter: Altho I also have BPH (Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy), my other insurance-related problem is HBP (High Blood Pressure) -- controlled by a AtaCand Plus (a betablocker + a water pill in one capsule) btw, the families of Alberta pay $88/month to the provincial government for complete healthcare for their families (seniors like me pay nothing). Most other provinces charge nothing to their citizens. So, our health care system in Alberta is *not* free (for those under 65yo) When we travel across our country, the healthcare is 'reciprocal' -- in that the other provinces will 'charge-back' the home province for medical services needed outside the home province. Except Quebec which refuses to participate -- ya might know !) So, altho Healthcare is run under *federal* rules, the actual operation is run by the individual provinces -- setting fees, handling claims, paying claims submitted by our 5000 doctors (who are private businessmen but who bill *one* payer -- the provincial government), negotiating each year for fees for the following year, etc. The cureent fee for seeing a GP and getting a pat on the back and advice is approx $30. -Mel Smith
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: Testing proceedures/Canada Next: Nexium and Back Pain and Sore Throat |