From: Rupert on
Hey Ball, you recently made the interesting statement that Animal
Liberation NSW is a terrorist organisation, despite obviously knowing
absolutely nothing about the organisation other than that it calls
itself an animal rights charity. I was wondering if you'd like to have
a go at defending this insane claim; I feel in the mood for a good
laugh. Do you maintain that we've ever engaged in any violence or
property damage? Do you claim that you have the slightest evidence for
such a claim or do you just intuit it by some sort of clairvoyant
process? Or is it that you have a definition of "terrorism" on which
an organisation can be a terrorist organisation without ever having
engaged in any violence or property damage?