From: Mark Probert on
Jan Drew wrote:
>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>> "marcia" <design1(a)insight.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1147472843.120768.191150(a)d71g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>>>> He doesn't know, it is just his insane need to argue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sad he could not win a case in court... then was dishonest and
>>>>> disbarred.
>>>> Having a little trouble with the concept of live & let live?
>>> In the Matter of Mark Probert

Jan, when will you adopt the practice of Live & Let Live?
From: Mark Probert on
marcia wrote:
> Jan Drew wrote:
>>> Jan Drew wrote:
>> SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
>>
>> 183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747
>>
>> November 9, 1992, Decided
>
> Didn't you post all of that yesterday?

Jan suffers from the most severe case of repeatitis on all of Usenet.

>
> I really don't understand why you think it's appropriate to publish
> this information. It's completely irrelevent to any current topic.
>
> My observation is that Mark has stopped attacking you. You, on the
> other hand, appear to be stalking him. What happened to live & let live?

According to Jan, I should let her live, and she will continue as before
because she is the ultimate arbiter of who is a liar.

Sad that.
From: Mark Probert on
Jan Drew wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote
>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>> "Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
>>>> "marcia" <design1(a)insight.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>>>>> He doesn't know, it is just his insane need to argue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sad he could not win a case in court... then was dishonest and
>>>>>> disbarred.
>>>>> Having a little trouble with the concept of live & let live?
>>>> Marcia, you have to realise that in altworld everyone with the same
>>>> name is the same person. Jan says that this Mark Probert is that Mark
>>>> Probert (without any evidence
>>> Wrong. The source has been posted.
>
> Source:


Jan, is this post consistent with L&LL?

Of course not.
From: Mark Probert on
Jan Drew wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
> news:HhH9g.8$Lz2.3(a)fe10.lga...
>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>> "Max C." <maxc246(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1147463673.916939.317270(a)j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Mark Probert wrote:
>>>>> (They would not be worn out if *S*o *C*alled *A*lternative *M*edicine
>>>>> had some form of basis in reality.)
>>>> So Alternative Medicine is a S C A M? Is that what you're implying by
>>>> emphasizing those letters? Does that apply to all alternative
>>>> therapies? Many, if not most alternative practitioners focus on
>>>> nutrition and its role in human health. Are you saying that good
>>>> nutrition is a scam? Are you saying the chiropractors are scam
>>>> artists? Your sweeping generalization requires some specificity,
>>>> because if you really believe that modern medical professionals are the
>>>> only ones qualified to heal the human body, most readers in the
>>>> alternative news groups will have had enough personal experience with
>>>> alternative practitioners to think of you as a quack.
>>>>
>>>> You see, that's exactly what the pharma hounds and FDA lap dogs of
>>>> yesteryear preached. Many of these "experts" testified in court that
>>>> the absence of vitamins and minerals from the human diet could not
>>>> cause degenerative, functional or infectious disease. Of course, we
>>>> now know beyond a doubt that such testimony is pure rubbish. Even the
>>>> average person on the street understands that vitamins and minerals are
>>>> required for good health.
>>>>
>>>> So, what exactly do you mean by your above statement?
>>>>
>>>> Max.
>>> He doesn't know, it is just his insane need to argue.
>> Once again, Jan, you provide the proof that you are stalking, harassing
>> and annoying me.
>
> If your past behavior annoys you...you have yourself to blame.
>>> Sad he could not win a case in court... then was dishonest and disbarred.
>> Once again, Jan, you provide the proof that you are stalking, harassing
>> and annoying me.
>
> If your past behavior annoys you...you have yourself to blame.
>
> Your present behavior shows you have not learned a thing.

I surely have nothing to learn from you. You, OTOH, should follow my
lead and learn to live and let live.
From: Mark Probert on
Jan Drew wrote:
> "marcia" <design1(a)insight.rr.com> wrote
>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>>>> Once again, Jan, you provide the proof that you are stalking, harassing
>>>> and annoying me.
>>> If your past behavior annoys you...you have yourself to blame.
>>>>> Sad he could not win a case in court... then was dishonest and
>>>>> disbarred.
>>>> Once again, Jan, you provide the proof that you are stalking, harassing
>>>> and annoying me.
>>> If your past behavior annoys you...you have yourself to blame.
>>>
>>> Your present behavior shows you have not learned a thing.
>>
>> Jan, this is really obnoxious behavior and doesn't reflect well on you.
>> For someone who purports to be a Christian, you seem to be having a
>> tough time with the basic tennets of the religion. Maybe you should
>> stop harrassing other people and reflect on your own shortcomings for a
>> change.
>
> If you find posting the *truth* is obnoxious, you must have a problem.
>
> Evidently, you prefer to overlook LIES. I don't. That is indeed...
> Christian.
>
> I have not harassed, I have posted the truth.

Posting what you believe to be the truth a hundred times in threads
where it has no relevance is harassment.

Jan, is this post consistent with L&LL?

Of course not.