Robert Kulacz, D.D.S.- Contact Informayion
in [Dentistry]
|
From: Robert Morien on 21 Oct 2005 01:12 In article <1129869339.125740.9870(a)o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, drkulacz(a)optonline.net wrote: > Real mature. You could not possibly have the title of Dr. > > That could not be possible with a suggesstion like "cue the spammers > to fill your mailbox". > > That type of behavior is for children. > > Silly me thinking that you were a dentist with a post like that. Some professional you are...you can't even quote one letter of what/who you are responding to. Learn to Quote and more weight MIGHT be given to what you post. Using google to post adds nothing to your assertions of professionalism. "Dude, Liar,etc." you forgot netiquette.
From: LadyLollipop on 21 Oct 2005 01:15 <drkulacz(a)optonline.net> wrote in message news:1129869339.125740.9870(a)o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > Real mature. You could not possibly have the title of Dr. > > That could not be possible with a suggesstion like "cue the spammers > to fill your mailbox". > > That type of behavior is for children. > > Silly me thinking that you were a dentist with a post like that. > Quite correct. It sounds very much like Richard H Jacobson, known cyberstalker. He has a huge problem.
From: LadyLollipop on 21 Oct 2005 04:19 "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop(a)insightbb.com> wrote in message news:gQ_5f.451429$_o.334569(a)attbi_s71... > > <drkulacz(a)optonline.net> wrote in message > news:1129869339.125740.9870(a)o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... >> Real mature. You could not possibly have the title of Dr. >> >> That could not be possible with a suggesstion like "cue the spammers >> to fill your mailbox". >> >> That type of behavior is for children. >> >> Silly me thinking that you were a dentist with a post like that. >> > Quite correct. > > It sounds very much like Richard H Jacobson, known cyberstalker. > > He has a huge problem. Sorry, I forgot just a tiny example, of many: Cue Jan to call me a liar for suggesting that she thinks that male breast cancer is funny. Cue Jan NOT to explain why she ROTFOLO. Just watch. Cue Jan to start a new thread attacking me. Just watch. Aloha, Rich Cue Jan to start a new thread "Rich is VERY confused". Just watch. Cue Jan NOT to admit that she is a sinner, liar and a bear of false witness even though I have proved this beyond any doubt. Aloha, Rich Cue Jan to say that this thread is not about Jan Aloha, Rich
From: Joel M. Eichen on 21 Oct 2005 04:29 On 20 Oct 2005 19:04:48 -0700, drkulacz(a)optonline.net wrote: >First. >Find controlled studies that were performed to refute Price and repeat >his work. >Second. Forget about Price altogether. Look at the data on necrotic >debris left in most all root canals. >Root canals are not sterile. ADA agrees with this. >The jaw bone is infected from the non sterile root canals. My friend, You need to review immunology! The world is a hostile place .... bacteria are everywhere! The world as you describe it would soon be devoid of organisms like us! Joel > >There are plenty of studies on that. if you can't find them then you do >not know how to do research as they are abundant. > >Enough fun for me on this board. >I would like to help and offer an intelligent exchange of data but >this is too hostile a place for me and life is too short for this. > >Have fun.
From: Vaughn on 21 Oct 2005 06:11
<drkulacz(a)optonline.net> wrote in message news:1129860288.383935.184370(a)z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > Root canals are not sterile. ADA agrees with this. I think I also agree, (though I am neither a doctor or a dentist). Which provokes the following questions: 1) Is the interior of a healthy tooth sterile? 2) What parts of the body are normally sterile? 3) If an MD properly treats a wound is that wound sterile? Thanks; Vaughn |