Robert Kulacz, D.D.S.- Contact Informayion
in [Dentistry]
|
From: Tony Bad on 17 Oct 2005 13:00 "Clinton" <clintonz(a)prodigy.net> wrote in message news:1129566585.927528.151970(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > And I haven't heard one scientific reference from you. > Just a bunch of bluster and Ego driven attacks based on the fact > that what you believe to be the standard should be "self-evident" > because your a "professional". Would you care to show proof for example > that x-rays are a reliable method for detecting residual infectin in > root canals? Didn't think so. Thanks for showing everyone how dentistry > (and the dental boards) really work. Your not a scientific organiztion, > your an ego driven mob. > I note you let slide the fact the post I responded to had no scientific information and just a lot of "I can understand things you can't" bullshit. Then again, I would expect nothing less from you. Who said x-rays are " a reliable method for detecting residual infectin in root canals" ?? I didn't...why should I defend it? The Doctor throws out a fact that is evident to anyone who practices dentistry and counts it as evidence of his tremendous insight and then unknowing but easily led buffoons like you take it as proof of...well, I don't know what you feel it is proof of. To me, it is proof that the good doctor is trying to pass himself off as something more than he is. X-rays show the condition of hard tissues. Signs of a residual infection can sometimes be seen radiographically, but more often, especially in early stages, they are noted by clinical exam or a review of patient's subjective reports. Has anyone here ever said or implied (other than the dr. that initiated this topic) that an x-ray is the only way to detect residual infections"? The doctor builds a straw man and you bow down before it...what a dolt you are. I'd suggest you learn a little more before you choose your idols otherwise you are going to find yourself running into the same problems you had before, where a questionable practitioner takes advantage of you and does you harm. T
From: Clinton on 17 Oct 2005 13:40 Tony Bad wrote: > "Clinton" <clintonz(a)prodigy.net> wrote in message > news:1129566585.927528.151970(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > I note you let slide the fact the post I responded to had no scientific > information and just a lot of "I can understand things you can't" bullshit. Dr. Kulacz wrote a whole book on the subject, try reading that! > Then again, I would expect nothing less from you. > > Who said x-rays are " a reliable method for detecting residual infectin in > root canals" ?? I didn't...why should I defend it? Not even residual infection, infection. maybe I shouldn't use that term. What do you mean by "residual" ? Why? because when people like sherry from the other thread get infections or my mother goes in and can feel the infection and the dentist keeps looking at the x-ray and saying, nope no sign of infection. Then after a month they final go in, and sure enough, there is infection! How about when that spreads to the jaw and the OS says's Gee, the panorex looks fine. That's what happened to me, and many other people I've talked to. And if you admit that x-rays cannot diagnose infection then what proof to you have of the safety, reliability of root canals. Zero! > The Doctor throws out a fact that is evident to anyone who > practices dentistry and counts it as evidence of his tremendous > insight and then unknowing but easily led > buffoons like you take it as proof of...well, I don't know what > you feel it is proof of. To me, it is proof that the good doctor > is trying to pass himself off as something more than he is. Which is conjecture on your part, so what are you reacting to? A percieved threat to dental dogma or what you really know about a dentist who questions root canals. by the way Dr. Kulacz does a lot of specialized surgery. He's talking from clincal experience. It's evident from what you say that rarely venture beyond the tooth. So you can't see what you don't look for, right? I don't know how i got into this mess ,but Hg can leak from the amalgam, damage the bone, and infection can get into the jaw without being detected, including necrotic and osteomyletic type infection. I lived it! You should see my CAT scan and you read the bio of the first dentist that skipped town! And.. fillings can even work as radio's. It's all true, but hard to believe! I guess I wouldn't have believed it either if I hadn't gone through it , but I try to keep an open mind in general, so maybe not. > > X-rays show the condition of hard tissues. Signs of a residual infection can > sometimes be seen radiographically, but more often, especially in early > stages, they are noted by clinical exam or a review of patient's subjective No, infection can exist IN THE BONE (or inbetween the bone) too and not be apparent on x-ray and I guess in the canal. Look at the people coming on here TELLIng YOU that. Don't belive me. I'll show you an x-ray of Jaw bone and then the actual infected jaw bone. And clinical exam of the patient? All that tells you is what kind of sound their tooth makes when you thump it. > I'd suggest you learn a little more before you choose your > idols otherwise you are going to find yourself running into the > same problems you had before, where a questionable practitioner > takes advantage of you and does you harm. Well , thanks for your concern ,but that is very unlikely.
From: Tony Bad on 17 Oct 2005 14:08 This reply is so full of confused thought and misinformation on your part it would take me a very long time to reply...but this bit of convoluted logic... "Clinton" <clintonz(a)prodigy.net> wrote in message news:1129570838.222991.308210(a)g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > And if you admit that x-rays cannot diagnose infection then what > proof to you have of the safety, reliability of root canals. Zero! ....just serves as a wake up call that there is absoluetly no point in debating this with you. I don't like to see people taken advantage of, but people like you who think they know sooo much when they really know so very little are really ripe for the plucking. Best of luck to you Clinton. I know you see me as the "enemy", but I sincerely hope you don't fall prey to some of the hucksters and con men out there who to me commit the biggest sin any healthcare provider could commit, selling false hope to desperate and vulnerable people. T
From: ber4000 on 17 Oct 2005 14:21 drkulacz(a)optonline.net ha escrito: > I can be reached at drkulacz(a)optonline.net. I wrote you to the that email but still I dont have any answer. Maybe my mail was clasificaded as junk or spam. could you check it please.
From: drkulacz on 19 Oct 2005 13:55
You obviously have not read the literature. Don't be lazy. It is there on Medline. You should talk to physicians that have seen my patients and know medicine and stop being simply a "tooth carpenter" technician. If you are a dentist you do not,in my opinion, deserve the title of doctor. Your posts border on slander/libel. Keep it up. Looking forward to more ignorant and malicious humour from you. |