Richard H Jacobson LIAR, Still Has NO Proof!
in [Alternative]
|
From: JanD on 11 Jan 2006 19:28 Rich Has NO proof. *Here is proof that she was bedridden the day before the amalgams were out and it is in Jan Drew's own words:* OH, dear, that makes Rich Shewmaker a LIAR, as he OFTEN REPEATS, that I am not capable of a discussion using my OWN WORDS! >Can you tell us what your health was like before the amalgams were >>removed and then how your health improved after the amalgams were removed? >I was bedfast and nonfunctional for several months, my bowels had nearly >shut down. >Jan Where is Proof??? *Notice that Jan DRew was specifically asked about her health before the amalgams were removed.* I wonder if Rich can show us the proof of where we can notice that? Who asked that question? Comon Rich show us. *June 16, 1999 was the day before she began to have her amalgams removed. She said she was "bedfast" and nonfunctional for *several months* WHEN and WHERE did I say that? JDrew63929 Mar 3 1999, 3:00 am >Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative >From: jdrew63...(a)aol.com (JDrew63929) - Find messages by this author >Date: 1999/03/03 >Subject: Re: "Dr" Hulda Clark >>I suppose you have the medical records that prove you were cured of a >>disease? That is NOT what was said! I invite all to go to the thread Dr. Hulda Clark, and read the thread. Rich has nuked his posts. Reason being, he does NOT want others to see his PATTERN OF BADGERING! What a stupid question. So how can Jan Drew have been bedfast and nonfunctional for several months before she had her amalgams out on June 17-18, 1999 when on March 3, 1999 she said that her body feels good. The FACT is, I said NO such thing. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. Right!!! *Over several weeks her health deteriorated OOOPPPSSS. Rich NOW changes it to *weeks* until on June 16, 1999 she was bedridden and unable to walk. WOW! Richard H Jacobson is a BLATANT LIAR! WHERE is the proof of this statement? Rich is obsessed. Rich can't keep his lies straight. Rich can't show us where the questions were asked. Rich nuked his posts, because he did not want to show his badgering. All of his predicts and cues are just part of his game. He is the one who does the attacking, just as he has every single person he has stalked. Boo hoo, he just can't run me off. Poor, poor, obsessed Rich. His mental conditional is deteriorating. He keeps his nose glued to the computer, cyberstalking Jan. He just can't run me off. Boo hoo. He is to be pitied This is all Rich has to say,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Rich has been caught!!! Rich has NO proof. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. AMEN! R...@. Jul 29, 11:11 pm Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Aug 5, 11:11 pm). On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:03:55 GMT, "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...(a)insightbb.com> wrote: >On 20 Feb 2005 19:33:16 -0800, "Jan" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>Jan wrote: >>Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title and >>insults. >>Proving once again: >>Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie ------------------------------?------------------- ------------------------------?------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance
From: Rich on 11 Jan 2006 21:38 "JanD" <JanD(a)insightbb.com> wrote in message news:9phxf.698249$_o.680174(a)attbi_s71... > Rich Has NO proof. > > > *Here is proof that she was bedridden the day before the amalgams were > out and it is in Jan Drew's own words:* > > OH, dear, that makes Rich Shewmaker a LIAR, as he OFTEN REPEATS, that I am > not capable of a discussion using my OWN WORDS! Er, where was the discussion? A discussion is back and forth dialog, with each participant expressing and defending original ideas. Polite people can do this without demands, accusations, and name calling. If you are presenting this thread as an example of your capability of discussion, it's a most impoverished specimen, as you have presented no ideas, and your manners are excreble. --Rich > > > > >>Can you tell us what your health was like before the amalgams were >>>removed and then how your health improved after the amalgams were >>>removed? > >>I was bedfast and nonfunctional for several months, my bowels had nearly >>shut down. >>Jan > > > Where is Proof??? > > *Notice that Jan DRew was specifically asked about her health before > the amalgams were removed.* > > > I wonder if Rich can show us the proof of where we can notice that? > > > Who asked that question? > > > Comon Rich show us. > > > *June 16, 1999 was the day before she began to have her amalgams > removed. > > > She said she was "bedfast" and nonfunctional for *several months* > > WHEN and WHERE did I say that? > > > > JDrew63929 Mar 3 1999, 3:00 am > > > >>Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative >>From: jdrew63...(a)aol.com (JDrew63929) - Find messages by this author >>Date: 1999/03/03 >>Subject: Re: "Dr" Hulda Clark > >>>I suppose you have the medical records that prove you were cured of a >>>disease? > > That is NOT what was said! > > I invite all to go to the thread Dr. Hulda Clark, and read the thread. > > Rich has nuked his posts. > > Reason being, he does NOT want others to see his PATTERN OF BADGERING! > > What a stupid question. > > > So how can Jan Drew have been bedfast and nonfunctional for several > months before she had her amalgams out on June 17-18, 1999 when on > March 3, 1999 she said that her body feels good. > > The FACT is, I said NO such thing. > > > Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. > > > Right!!! > > > *Over several weeks her health deteriorated > > OOOPPPSSS. > > Rich NOW changes it to *weeks* > > until on June 16, 1999 she was bedridden and unable to walk. > > WOW! Richard H Jacobson is a BLATANT LIAR! > > WHERE is the proof of this statement? > > Rich is obsessed. > > > Rich can't keep his lies straight. > > > Rich can't show us where the questions were asked. > > > Rich nuked his posts, because he did not want to show his badgering. > > > All of his predicts and cues are just part of his game. > > > He is the one who does the attacking, just as he has every single person > he > has stalked. > > > Boo hoo, he just can't run me off. > > > Poor, poor, obsessed Rich. > > > His mental conditional is deteriorating. > > > He keeps his nose glued to the computer, cyberstalking Jan. > > > He just can't run me off. > > > Boo hoo. > > > He is to be pitied > > This is all Rich has to say,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, > > > Rich has been caught!!! Rich has NO proof. > > > > Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. > > > AMEN! > > > R...@. Jul 29, 11:11 pm > > > Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. > This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Aug 5, 11:11 pm). > On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:03:55 GMT, "LadyLollipop" > > > > <LadyLolli...(a)insightbb.com> wrote: > > > >On 20 Feb 2005 19:33:16 -0800, "Jan" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>>Jan wrote: >>>Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title and >>>insults. >>>Proving once again: >>>Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie > > > ------------------------------?------------------- > ------------------------------?------------------- > > Best defense to logic is ignorance > >
From: JanD on 11 Jan 2006 23:58 "Rich" <joshew(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message news:Tijxf.1963$sd1.1581(a)tornado.socal.rr.com... > > "JanD" <JanD(a)insightbb.com> wrote in message > news:9phxf.698249$_o.680174(a)attbi_s71... >> Rich Has NO proof. >> >> >> *Here is proof that she was bedridden the day before the amalgams were >> out and it is in Jan Drew's own words:* >> >> OH, dear, that makes Rich Shewmaker a LIAR, as he OFTEN REPEATS, that I >> am not capable of a discussion using my OWN WORDS! > > Er, where was the discussion? Er, Er, Er, Er, For some strange LOL reason that's getting most popular *;* Yes indeedly, just WHERE is there any PROOF, I was bedridden the day BEFORE my amalgams were out?!?! >A discussion is back and forth dialog, with each participant expressing >and defending original ideas. B I N G O!! Wonder why the other half of the discussion went?!?! You don't suppose it was nuked do you?? yawn [usual insults snipped] Now, don't forget to answer, try very hard to be truthful > > --Rich > > >> >> >> >> >>>Can you tell us what your health was like before the amalgams were >>>>removed and then how your health improved after the amalgams were >>>>removed? >> >>>I was bedfast and nonfunctional for several months, my bowels had nearly >>>shut down. >>>Jan >> >> >> Where is Proof??? >> >> *Notice that Jan DRew was specifically asked about her health before >> the amalgams were removed.* >> >> >> I wonder if Rich can show us the proof of where we can notice that? >> >> >> Who asked that question? >> >> >> Comon Rich show us. >> >> >> *June 16, 1999 was the day before she began to have her amalgams >> removed. >> >> >> She said she was "bedfast" and nonfunctional for *several months* >> >> WHEN and WHERE did I say that? >> >> >> >> JDrew63929 Mar 3 1999, 3:00 am >> >> >> >>>Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative >>>From: jdrew63...(a)aol.com (JDrew63929) - Find messages by this author >>>Date: 1999/03/03 >>>Subject: Re: "Dr" Hulda Clark >> >>>>I suppose you have the medical records that prove you were cured of a >>>>disease? >> >> That is NOT what was said! >> >> I invite all to go to the thread Dr. Hulda Clark, and read the thread. >> >> Rich has nuked his posts. >> >> Reason being, he does NOT want others to see his PATTERN OF BADGERING! >> >> What a stupid question. >> >> >> So how can Jan Drew have been bedfast and nonfunctional for several >> months before she had her amalgams out on June 17-18, 1999 when on >> March 3, 1999 she said that her body feels good. >> >> The FACT is, I said NO such thing. >> >> >> Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. >> >> >> Right!!! >> >> >> *Over several weeks her health deteriorated >> >> OOOPPPSSS. >> >> Rich NOW changes it to *weeks* >> >> until on June 16, 1999 she was bedridden and unable to walk. >> >> WOW! Richard H Jacobson is a BLATANT LIAR! >> >> WHERE is the proof of this statement? >> >> Rich is obsessed. >> >> >> Rich can't keep his lies straight. >> >> >> Rich can't show us where the questions were asked. >> >> >> Rich nuked his posts, because he did not want to show his badgering. >> >> >> All of his predicts and cues are just part of his game. >> >> >> He is the one who does the attacking, just as he has every single person >> he >> has stalked. >> >> >> Boo hoo, he just can't run me off. >> >> >> Poor, poor, obsessed Rich. >> >> >> His mental conditional is deteriorating. >> >> >> He keeps his nose glued to the computer, cyberstalking Jan. >> >> >> He just can't run me off. >> >> >> Boo hoo. >> >> >> He is to be pitied >> >> This is all Rich has to say,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, >> >> >> Rich has been caught!!! Rich has NO proof. >> >> >> >> Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. >> >> >> AMEN! >> >> >> R...@. Jul 29, 11:11 pm >> >> >> Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. >> This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Aug 5, 11:11 pm). >> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:03:55 GMT, "LadyLollipop" >> >> >> >> <LadyLolli...(a)insightbb.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On 20 Feb 2005 19:33:16 -0800, "Jan" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>Jan wrote: >>>>Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title and >>>>insults. >>>>Proving once again: >>>>Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie >> >> >> ------------------------------?------------------- >> ------------------------------?------------------- >> >> Best defense to logic is ignorance WHAT? Rich Shewmaker has nothing to say???
From: carole on 12 Jan 2006 19:09 Rich wrote: > "JanD" <JanD(a)insightbb.com> wrote in message > news:9phxf.698249$_o.680174(a)attbi_s71... > > Rich Has NO proof. > > > > > > *Here is proof that she was bedridden the day before the amalgams were > > out and it is in Jan Drew's own words:* > > > > OH, dear, that makes Rich Shewmaker a LIAR, as he OFTEN REPEATS, that I am > > not capable of a discussion using my OWN WORDS! > > Er, where was the discussion? A discussion is back and forth dialog, with > each participant expressing and defending original ideas. Polite people can > do this without demands, accusations, and name calling. If you are > presenting this thread as an example of your capability of discussion, it's > a most impoverished specimen, as you have presented no ideas, and your > manners are excreble. > > --Rich > But surely the point is whether mercury is dangerous to health, or leaks from amalgam fillings or - is there a hidden conspiracy to poison people? from THE SECRET COVENANT http://user.pa.net/~drivera/fwappa.htm "We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things. When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future. When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine. We will render them docile and weak before us by our power. They will grow depressed, slow and obese; and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison." I think this Secret Covenant is very revealing and people who say its not true, I say "prove it". Carole http://www.conspiracee.com http://www.cellsalts.net
From: Rich on 12 Jan 2006 19:38 "carole" <hubbca2003(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:1137110969.959616.227240(a)g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Rich wrote: >> "JanD" <JanD(a)insightbb.com> wrote in message >> news:9phxf.698249$_o.680174(a)attbi_s71... >> > Rich Has NO proof. >> > >> > >> > *Here is proof that she was bedridden the day before the amalgams were >> > out and it is in Jan Drew's own words:* >> > >> > OH, dear, that makes Rich Shewmaker a LIAR, as he OFTEN REPEATS, that I >> > am >> > not capable of a discussion using my OWN WORDS! >> >> Er, where was the discussion? A discussion is back and forth dialog, with >> each participant expressing and defending original ideas. Polite people >> can >> do this without demands, accusations, and name calling. If you are >> presenting this thread as an example of your capability of discussion, >> it's >> a most impoverished specimen, as you have presented no ideas, and your >> manners are excreble. >> >> --Rich >> > > But surely the point is whether mercury is dangerous to health, or > leaks from amalgam fillings or - is there a hidden conspiracy to poison > people? > > from THE SECRET COVENANT > http://user.pa.net/~drivera/fwappa.htm > > "We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target > their children with what children love most, sweet things. > When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill > their mind and steal their future. > When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine > that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will > create yet more medicine. > We will render them docile and weak before us by our power. > They will grow depressed, slow and obese; and when they come to us for > help, we will give them more poison." > > I think this Secret Covenant is very revealing and people who say its > not true, I say "prove it". > > Carole > http://www.conspiracee.com > http://www.cellsalts.net > THE SECRET PACT We will convince people that there are TOXINS all about, and then we will profit from selling detox concoctions to those who are afraid that they are being poisoned. We will also tell people that they are being poisoned by mercury in their teeth (which we will always refer to as MERCURY amalgams instead of the proper term "silver amalgams"). Then we can profit by replacing all those fillings, and also we can set up bogus labs that will consistently report elevated mercury levels to encourage the hesitant to buy our dental services. We will invent a vague disease called "imbalance" and infer that it has something to do with what the orientals call "Qi." Then we will sell all sorts of treatments to manipulate qi and "restore balance." Since most people know that they have something call the immune system and believe they know something about it, we will use promises to "boost the immune system" to actually boost our sales. We will use impressive looking, but worthless devices to "diagnose" the above conditions. We will hijack ancient therapies such as Qi Gong and Homeopathy, and invent new ones like aromatherapy and Reiki and magnet therapy and sell them all as our profits go up and up. Meanwhile we will invent a conspiracy of the medical doctors, dentists, researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and government agencies, and accuse them of causing illness for profit. Last, we will victimize the terminally ill, making sure that they die penniless and hopeless. I think this Secret Pact is very revealing and if you think it's not true, I say, "prove it." -- --Rich Recommended websites: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Oxygenated Water Next: Defend Your Spiritual Beliefs! (Spiritual Healing Under Attack) |