Restrict Freedom while singing about Freedom
in [Depression]
|
From: CJ Dunnaway on 1 Sep 2008 12:59 <Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:d9d61716-647f-41b1-a149-529a4c509f4f(a)8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... x-no-archive: yes Overreaction? he's lucky he's not in Gitmo. Evil Nigel ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LOL! Sad, but true. :)
From: humble.life on 1 Sep 2008 13:02 CJ Dunnaway wrote: > <Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:d9d61716-647f-41b1-a149-529a4c509f4f(a)8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > x-no-archive: yes > > Overreaction? he's lucky he's not in Gitmo. > > Evil Nigel > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > LOL! Sad, but true. :) don't spose you want to let your reader leave the quotes in? hard to tell who's responding to who. or whom. whichever is correct.
From: CJ Dunnaway on 1 Sep 2008 13:11 "humble.life" <gn(a)t.com> wrote in message news:6i2lhiFoe779U2(a)mid.individual.net... > CJ Dunnaway wrote: >> <Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:d9d61716-647f-41b1-a149-529a4c509f4f(a)8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> Overreaction? he's lucky he's not in Gitmo. >> >> Evil Nigel >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> LOL! Sad, but true. :) > > > don't spose you want to let your reader leave the quotes in? hard to > tell who's responding to who. or whom. whichever is correct I don't know the proper Usenet protocol for replying to top-posters, and I was afraid of offending the resident pedantics. CJ (BTW, it's whom) ;)
From: humble.life on 1 Sep 2008 13:14 CJ Dunnaway wrote: > "humble.life" <gn(a)t.com> wrote in message > news:6i2lhiFoe779U2(a)mid.individual.net... >> CJ Dunnaway wrote: >>> <Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>> news:d9d61716-647f-41b1-a149-529a4c509f4f(a)8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >>> x-no-archive: yes >>> >>> Overreaction? he's lucky he's not in Gitmo. >>> >>> Evil Nigel >>> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> LOL! Sad, but true. :) >> >> >> don't spose you want to let your reader leave the quotes in? hard to >> tell who's responding to who. or whom. whichever is correct > > I don't know the proper Usenet protocol for replying to top-posters, and > I was afraid of offending the resident pedantics. > > CJ (BTW, it's whom) ;) when the > things are there, you can see the "depth" of conversation immediately (as scruffy as it seems) HL (P.S. blimey, i thought it was just who)
From: CJ Dunnaway on 1 Sep 2008 13:20
"humble.life" <gn(a)t.com> wrote in message news:6i2m83FobsatU3(a)mid.individual.net... > CJ Dunnaway wrote: >> "humble.life" <gn(a)t.com> wrote in message >> news:6i2lhiFoe779U2(a)mid.individual.net... >>> CJ Dunnaway wrote: >>>> <Evil_Nigel(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> news:d9d61716-647f-41b1-a149-529a4c509f4f(a)8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >>>> x-no-archive: yes >>>> >>>> Overreaction? he's lucky he's not in Gitmo. >>>> >>>> Evil Nigel >>>> >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>> >>>> LOL! Sad, but true. :) >>> >>> >>> don't spose you want to let your reader leave the quotes in? hard >>> to tell who's responding to who. or whom. whichever is correct >> >> I don't know the proper Usenet protocol for replying to top-posters, >> and I was afraid of offending the resident pedantics. >> >> CJ (BTW, it's whom) ;) > > when the > things are there, you can see the "depth" of conversation > immediately (as scruffy as it seems) > > HL (P.S. blimey, i thought it was just who) Those are chevrons and I didn't remove them. It's a strange anomaly with Windows Mail (which replaced OE) that came packaged with Vista. |