From: anonymous on
>Didn't Jesus eat fish? I think I remember somethimg about that from
my
> scholing. Or is fish not meat in the eyes of a vegatrian?

He ate fish on several recorded occasions. He ate lamb, too, at
Passover. And in the Parable of the Prodigal Son he refers without
disapproval to the father slaying "the fatted calf" and eating its meat.

Very interesting. We are reminded also he facilitated the catching of
fish at several events and caused the division of a few fish so many could
be fed.

He also said at one point regarding food:

"he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand: Not
that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out
of the mouth, this defileth a man."

And in a dream correcting Peter He revealed new laws regarding food:

"Upon the which when I had fastened mine eyes, I considered, and saw
fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and
fowls of the air. And I heard a voice saying unto me, Arise, Peter; slay
and eat.

But I said, Not so, Lord: for nothing common or
unclean hath at any time entered into my mouth.

But the voice answered me again from heaven, What God hath cleansed, that
call not thou common."

After He taught Peter this new law in the dream He changed the dietary
laws regarding meat to eat and meat not to eat. Paul and other writers
thereafter mention in several places that no meat should now be excluded
based on the old law.
From: ironjustice on
On Aug 11, 11:45 am, anonym...(a)nowhere.you.know wrote:
And in a dream correcting Peter He revealed new laws regarding food:

Upon the which when I had fastened mine eyes, I considered, and saw
fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things,
and
fowls of the air. And I heard a voice saying unto me, Arise, Peter;
slay
and eat. <<

What PART of .. Peter **didn't** .. eat .. buddy .. didn't you
understand .. ?

You have a problem with .. English .. ?

This is Dietary Science or you would be getting one of my .. "why I ..
otter" ..

Have you read this book mentioned : The Hidden Mystery of the
Bible.. ?

This is the second time you have posted this interpretation on this
thread ..

A plausible answer was given to you and explained ..

YOUR take home message has flaws.
Mine holds water PROVEN .. by .. ? .. the unclean man from .. Peter ..
himself.

"Peter said he never ate such food (even years after the resurrection
of Yeshua, knowing better) and God told him not to call what He had
cleansed common or unclean.

THREE MEN were waiting for him to go with them to the home of the
spiritually unclean Gentile Cornelius - where after a sermon in which
Peter said they were spiritually unclean as far as Jews were
concerned, God poured out the Holy Spirit upon them.

Peter - to whom the vision was given - interpreted the vision and said
that God had shown him - a new revelation - that he should not call
any MAN common or unclean but that God had now accepted the Gentiles
who had repented to become part of the household of faith. The same
Gentiles that later the Jerusalem Council of Acts 15 instructed about
the dietary laws, symbolized by the prohibition against eating blood "

IF you .. **deny** .. the unclean man the next day was NOT .. the
'take home message' .. show .. me .. or .. cease and desist ..

Understand .. ? Peter himself .. interpreted .. it .

Repeated production without conversation is counterproductive.

I already told you what happened .. didn't .. I ..


"Peter was TOLD .. in very loud words .. to .. "kill and eat" .. and
never did .. "


Never .. did ..


But YOU say .. he .. did .. ?


Or .. what .. ?


Peter REFUSED to .. kill and eat .. THREE times .. IE: hit it God ,
eat me God , bite .. me .. God ..


Sooo .. contrary to what you .. say ..


Peter never did eat meat .. never did kill .. and had enough ..
cojones .. to tell God himself to .. eat me .. not once .. not
twice .. but .. threee .. times .. and never did .. eat ..


Soooo .. the MESSAGE which comes out of that is .. ?


A vision was chosen in which the 'order' would beeee soooooo ..
**contrary** TO the teachings of Christ that Peter would KNOW it
was .. wrong .. and MUST have to pertain to some OTHER .. thing.


Which it did .. it pertained to the dirty man who appeared to him the
next day .. the 'unclean man' whom Peter would **normally** steer ..
CLEAR .. of.


Next day WHEN the unclean man and Peter .. **met** Peter THEN knew ..
'this must be what the unclean bit was all .. about .. ?'


Sho .. nuff .. it .. wassss ..

Metaphysical Interpretation
and Review of the Bible
(39 hours/13 weeks)
This class, based on Jack Addington's book, The Hidden Mystery of the
Bible," will introduce New Thought students to the hidden or esoteric
meanings of Biblical scriptures. Students will begin to understand
the
deeper meanings of names, places and numbers found in the Bible, and
will uncover an infinite source of illumination and wisdom.


Textbooks:
The Hidden Mystery of the Bible, Jack Addington; The Science of Mind,
Ernest Holmes; The Bible


Who loves ya.
Tom


Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://tinyurl.com/2r2nkh


Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/4rq595


DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk







>
>                         But I said, Not so, Lord: for nothing common or
> unclean hath at any time entered into my mouth.
>
> But the voice answered me again from heaven, What God hath cleansed, that
> call not thou common."
>
> After He taught Peter this new law in the dream He changed the dietary
> laws regarding meat to eat and meat not to eat.  Paul and other writers
> thereafter mention in several places that no meat should now be excluded
> based on the old law.

From: Roger Pearse on
On 13 Aug, 07:04, ironjustice <teamtan...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 10:08 pm, ironjustice <teamtan...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: IF
> you take the Bible at face value. <<
>
> This man seems to have done some work and is decidedly vegetarian.
>
> http://jbrooks2.tripod.com/Greatest_Collosal_Fraud_On_Earth.html
>
> "So in place of The Humane Gospel Of Christ, they put their newly
> created Gospel called The New Testament, or The Four Gospels, in its
> place. Altering and removing any Text that referred to Flesh Eating,
> Strong Drinks and Compassion to Animals."

Unfortunately the man is a nut, quoting cranks. None of the events
described occurred.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
From: Roger Pearse on
On 13 Aug, 07:01, "trigonometry1...(a)gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 10:08 pm, ironjustice <teamtan...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > In a book titled The Gospel of the Holy Twelve the late Rev, G. J.
> > Ouseley has written a translation of the original Gospel which members
> > of the Essene community preserved from the general corruption. He
> > presents a version of the teachings of Jesus untampered with by the
> > "correctors" appointed by the ecclesiastical authorities ofNicea.
>
> Finally we get to know what Tommy is basing his comments on.
> And is likely a 2nd century document ...

Actually a 19/20th century document. The period produced shoals of
fake gospels. E.J.Goodspeed did a collection of them, in "Strange new
gospels".

www.tertullian.org/articles/goodspeed_strange_new_gospels.htm

All the best,

Roger Pearse
From: ironjustice on
On Aug 13, 7:35 am, anonym...(a)nowhere.you.know wrote:
With each new post new examples from scripture about eating meat are
added
or expanded upon.  New items are added at the end. <<

What PART of your .. interpretation is .. shite .. DON'T you ..
**understand** .. ?

I could FOREVER .. post .. words that say .. meat .. couldn't we ..

THAT seems to be your .. intent .. ?

You have what .. ?

Words .. ?

I have .. what .. ?

Words .. ?

Repetitive posting of .. words .. ?

Heh .. eh ..

Go for it .. buddy ..

Maybe you should get a .. scanner .. ?

Maybe a .. concordance .. ?

I can lend you mine .. ?

Heh .. heh ..


Who loves ya.
Tom


Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://tinyurl.com/2r2nkh


Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/4rq595


DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk