From: Tai on
Erin wrote:

> I hope that clarifies my side regarding personal responsibility. One
> is
> always personally responsible for a decision after all, but we would
> not have marketing, advertising, or counselling if some other
> perspective
> did not have an influence.

Erin, hasn't the decision to reconcile only every really been your
husband's? He's the one who left and he is the one who may return
eventually. The comments you have made about your counselling sessions have
suggested to me that he has been determined not to come back unless you
would meet his conditions, and not so much that he would meet yours. But
you've wanted him back so you are the one making the most concessions to
facilitate that.

Have I got that correct?

From: Erin on


Tai wrote:
> Erin wrote:
>
> > I hope that clarifies my side regarding personal responsibility. One
> > is
> > always personally responsible for a decision after all, but we would
> > not have marketing, advertising, or counselling if some other
> > perspective
> > did not have an influence.
>
> Erin, hasn't the decision to reconcile only every really been your
> husband's? He's the one who left and he is the one who may return
> eventually. The comments you have made about your counselling sessions have
> suggested to me that he has been determined not to come back unless you
> would meet his conditions, and not so much that he would meet yours. But
> you've wanted him back so you are the one making the most concessions to
> facilitate that.
>
> Have I got that correct?

It's that black and white; it's more like my trying to see his point
of
view, and most of all trusting him.

Erin
From: Erin on

>
> You're not sure that what is not love?
>
That i care enough to react.
>
>Erin

From: Michaela Mackenzie on
On Aug 16, 1:50 pm, Erin wrote:
> > You're not sure that what is not love?
>
> That i care enough to react.
>
> >Erin

That you care enough to react to what?

- Michaela