From: Annie on
On Sep 2, 6:54 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 7:14 pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Do these Quackwatch connected individuals not have anything better to
> > do with their time----or do they think they are above the law?
>
> You have nothing to worry about from anyone from Quackwatch. I would
> be more concerned with your former, and so-called, friends.

Well, then do tell why the "Mitchell Brothers" were in my life from
1997 until two weeks ago, and in the lives of the witnesses from those
old lawsuits and why bits and pieces of my in-home conversations and
why all of the hacking from 1997 to present going on and phone
tapping? The common thread is that we once were witnesses in
lawsuits, and that we all do a form of alternative health care that
our medical providers advise us to do.

As far as friends "go," I cannot think of one of them here or any
place else that would do anything like this. And after seeing one of
them with Frank, I am wondering, why was the DOD in my life all of
those years?

I'd like a good explanation. Thank you.




From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 2, 10:52 pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 6:54 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 2, 7:14 pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Do these Quackwatch connected individuals not have anything better to
> > > do with their time----or do they think they are above the law?
>
> > You have nothing to worry about from anyone from Quackwatch. I would
> > be more concerned with your former, and so-called, friends.
>
> Well, then do tell why the "Mitchell Brothers" were in my life from
> 1997 until two weeks ago, and in the lives of the witnesses from those
> old lawsuits and why bits and pieces of my in-home conversations and
> why all of the hacking from 1997 to present going on and phone
> tapping?  The common thread is that we once were witnesses in
> lawsuits, and that we all do a form of alternative health care that
> our medical providers advise us to do.
>
> As far as friends "go,"  I cannot think of one of them here or any
> place else that would do anything like this.   And after seeing one of
> them with Frank, I am wondering, why was the DOD in my life all of
> those years?
>
> I'd like a good explanation.   Thank you.

I am not aware of your past history. You give Quackwatch way too much
power..
From: Annie on
On Sep 3, 3:01 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I am not aware of your past history. You give Quackwatch way too much
> power..

I have absolutely ZERO criminal history of any kind, and I don't even
jay walk!
However, you and Frank talked about too much of my personal business
that only a person tapping my lines,
and bugging my residences could ever have known. Even connecting the
old private investigator, in my past neighborhood to all of this, is
sick and twisted. It never stopped, Mark. And all of us that have
had this in our lives
for way too long are going to do what we have to do to make it stop.
It is the right thing to do.

And with the old Mark Lindsay vs Paul Revere lawsuits all we did was
state our
opinion about things, and tell the truth. No one got anything. Even
the Lindsay vs Revere suits-no one got any money. Both settled out of
court. But the wire tapping, computer hacking, computer fraud,
harassment, following, stalking, etc haven't stopped since
approximately March 1997 to present, and it is very old; but I do know
who we will see at the very bottom of the pile----that started this
whole mess in the first place. I hope that individual (and her
friends) realize that there could have been a reunion tour, and no
lawsuits were ever needed.
But I do know that Quackwatch and skeptics group members were involved
over on the AOL boards and were involved in those lawsuits.

But instead, that individual (and her friends) made one huge gigantic
mess by making up stuff that was not true, hoping to make a name for
herself at the expense of others, and trying to damage the reputation
of others. I believe in giving people second chances, Probert, but
those second chances have long worn themselves out because it hasn't
stopped, and no one should be taping anyone's lines for any reason,
and no one should ever hack anyone's computer for any reason. What
should have been between two old time friends (Mark Lindsay and Paul
Revere) became one huge ugly mess on AOL, instead lawsuits were filed,
and ruined old time relationships; but as time will march on (as it
always does), I think I can help remedy the solution between those old
time friends, and put them back together again. I'm going to talk to
Mark about it soon. There's a solution, and at age 66, its never too
late to get a back bone and go after the real offending parties.

But really, the DOD involvement in my life, and the lives of others
connected to the lawsuits that started with the first tapping of my
telephone lines in March 1997 connected to Virginia Beach, and NY.
Before Terri and I were ever sued, is a bit too much. Denver skeptic,
John R. Wolfe, always made reference to the "Mitchell Brothers" on the
AOL boards, I thought he was referring to an adult theatre in San
Francisco from his alleged line of work, but after my conversation
with Andrew Langer had looped the Pentagon, I went to individuals
connected to National Security, and found that the DOD had been in my
life for a very long time. Title 18 of the U.S. Code "Civil Rights"
prohibits Intelligence on a U.S Citizen.

If you are not involved, then help us figure out how it happened, and
an email would would be appreciated.

Thank you.

From: Peter Bowditch on
Mark Probert <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sep 2, 7:14�pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do these Quackwatch connected individuals not have anything better to
>> do with their time----or do they think they are above the law?
>
>You have nothing to worry about from anyone from Quackwatch. I would
>be more concerned with your former, and so-called, friends.

Her true friends are the ones who visit her now. Those who are
prepared to go through the locked doors and past the orderlies and
psych nurses to get to the secure wards in the asylum. This is so
confronting that most people can't face it.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 3, 8:08 am, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 3, 3:01 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am not aware of your past history. You give Quackwatch way too much
> > power..
>
> I have absolutely ZERO criminal history of any kind, and I don't even
> jay walk!

Always a good idea. I was not referring to a criminal history. I was
referring to what you had posted and I deleted.

> However, you and Frank talked about too much of my personal business
> that only a person tapping my lines,

I have never discussed anything about you with Frank, etc. If you
persist in making this bogus claim, please provide actual
documentation, since it will refer me to the person impersonating me.

> and bugging my residences could ever have known.  Even connecting the
> old private investigator, in my past neighborhood to all of this, is
> sick and twisted.  It never stopped, Mark.  And all of us that have
> had this in our lives
> for way too long are going to do what we have to do to make it stop.
> It is the right thing to do.

Whatever. Howver, I am not involved in any of that.

>
> And with the old Mark Lindsay vs Paul Revere lawsuits all we did was
> state our
> opinion about things, and tell the truth. No one got anything.  Even
> the Lindsay vs Revere suits-no one got any money. Both settled out of
> court.  But the wire tapping, computer hacking, computer fraud,
> harassment, following, stalking, etc haven't stopped since
> approximately March 1997 to present, and it is very old; but I do know
> who we will see at the very bottom of the pile----that started this
> whole mess in the first place.  I hope that individual (and her
> friends) realize that there could have been a reunion tour, and no
> lawsuits were ever needed.

I am totally uninterested in that.

> But I do know that Quackwatch and skeptics group members were involved
> over on the AOL boards and were involved in those lawsuits.

Provide proof.


>
> But instead, that individual (and her friends) made one huge gigantic
> mess by making up stuff that was not true, hoping to make a name for
> herself at the expense of others, and trying to damage the reputation
> of others.  I believe in giving people second chances, Probert, but
> those second chances have long worn themselves out because it hasn't
> stopped, and no one should be taping anyone's lines for any reason,
> and no one should ever hack anyone's computer for any reason.  What
> should have been between two old time friends (Mark Lindsay and Paul
> Revere) became one huge ugly mess on AOL, instead lawsuits were filed,
> and ruined old time relationships; but as time will march on (as it
> always does), I think I can help remedy the solution between those old
> time friends, and put them back together again.  I'm going to talk to
> Mark about it soon.  There's a solution, and at age 66, its never too
> late to get a back bone and go after the real offending parties.

Not interested. It is your business.


>
> If you are not involved, then help us figure out how it happened, and
> an email would would be appreciated.

Not interested. Not involved. I wish you the best. Forget about
Usenet.