From: Peter B on

"Perplexed" <openlyincognito(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cce6aeec-8d2d-49e8-9e0b-70fc5ece9de4(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> Looks to me like paying for accessing that site only succeeding in
> pissing you off. It has done you no good, nor any of your kids.
> --------------
> Yeah, it looked to you like Stanford didn't admit average kids also.
> But you were proven wrong.
>

You are severely damaged mentally. I didn't say that.

> As I said, buy a clue; it only costs $14.99 to subscribe to the actual
> facts about college admissions in the US.
>

Why should I pay someone I don't trust anything to compile "facts" that
are plainly obvious and were available everywhere?

> And again I point out how utterly IGNORANT it is to make moronic
> claims about kids you know absolutely nothing about. You're an idiot.
>

You have succeeded in proving your stupidity, soundly. You lost track of
the subject and are now making things up. The kids I was speaking of I
knew quite well.

>
> I'm curious, since you seem so concerned about education, and act like
> you know the effort it takes to get to higher education and obviously
> sense its value, then why do you diss Marks education? Is it because
> you
> were never able to achieve that level for yourself?
> ------------------
>
> Are you one of his sock puppets, or what? I have no idea what his
> education is, nor do I care. I've seen the evidence on here of what
> he chose to do with it though. You might think getting thrown out of
> one's chosen profession is admirable; intelligent people do not.
>

Had you *any* higher education you would know what it takes to be a
lawyer. Obviously you are oblivious to that fact. Hence dumber than a
high school hick.

> I'm quite certain my level of education is at least as high, and I
> know my level of professional achievement and wealth are higher.
> But again, you can continue posting idiotic attacks about someone you
> know nothing about if you think it somehow makes you look better.
>

I just spoke pertaining to his education and yours, as to his wealth? I
don't know.

It doesn't take education to be wealthy as is shown by the top ten in
wealth in the USA.

> I guess it hurts your feelings to have been shown to be totally
> misinformed when it comes to Stanford admissions...too fcking bad.
> Learn to deal. Admit you were clueless and move on.
>

You really are stupid, gullible and ignorant. Keep on believing your
substandard kids will get there. ;)

They'd have a far better chance at being astronauts.


From: Perplexed on
I wasn't paying $50 bucks for lawn care. The psychotic loon who
posted it made it up and you are ignorant enough to believe her.

From: Perplexed on
> Yeah, it looked to you like Stanford didn't admit average kids also.
> But you were proven wrong.

You are severely damaged mentally. I didn't say that.
==========

You most certainly did.

"but a 2.4 is pretty low,. too low for Stanford
unless it was a football scholarship."

I didn't bother reading the rest of your drivel after that.
From: Peter B on

"Perplexed" <openlyincognito(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ef722f65-ec3a-4b44-bbf4-e6b6384cfe29(a)k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>I wasn't paying $50 bucks for lawn care. The psychotic loon who
> posted it made it up and you are ignorant enough to believe her.
>

Then why did you cut the gardener and pay your kids 20 bucks for the
same thing, cheap skate?


From: Peter B on

"Perplexed" <openlyincognito(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9bc02dca-c678-40dd-b274-f143e431a3dc(a)l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> Yeah, it looked to you like Stanford didn't admit average kids also.
>> But you were proven wrong.
>
> You are severely damaged mentally. I didn't say that.
> ==========
>
> You most certainly did.
>
> "but a 2.4 is pretty low,. too low for Stanford
> unless it was a football scholarship."
>
> I didn't bother reading the rest of your drivel after that.

Of course you didn't bother, it was all over your head.

Avg kids are not admitted to Stanford Univ unless for other reasons,
race, sports, etc. Like I mentioned above.

Oh yes, there is one other major exception, children or major
contributing alumni.

Anyone who breaks onto the scene with an obsessive compulsive behavior
against a long lost love is very sick, mentally and emotionally. Chances
are pretty good your poor kids will suffer the problems of their dad.