|
Prev: despairing condompuppet
Next: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: 5th validation of scientific proof that Jesus is LORD <><
From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD on 18 Sep 2008 21:17 convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > Null hypothesis: > > > > Jesus is not LORD so that GOD's promise in 1 Corinthians 12:3 that > > "...no one can say, 'Jesus is LORD,' except by the Holy Spirit" would > > not be realized. > > > > Prediction based on null hypothesis: > > > > Non-christians would be able to publicly say with their mouths "Jesus > > is LORD." > > > > Observation: > > > > Non-christians have been invariably unable to publicly say with their > > mouths that "Jesus is LORD." > > Observation: the conditional "publicly" nowhere appears in the > verse. You again forget the context of the verse: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/fedb99700251faad? Bottom line concerning your difficulties: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/773bdee360f7775e? <>< http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
From: E.P. Uum on 19 Sep 2008 02:30 In article <d6e43b98-6ea2-4923-ad15-46ef074b0cb0(a)m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love30(a)thetruth.com> wrote: Convicted pederast Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD, wrote child pornography here which I have erased.
From: Thommadura on 19 Sep 2008 12:07 Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote: >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >>> Null hypothesis: >>> >>> Jesus is not LORD so that GOD's promise in 1 Corinthians 12:3 that >>> "...no one can say, 'Jesus is LORD,' except by the Holy Spirit" would >>> not be realized. >>> >>> Prediction based on null hypothesis: >>> >>> Non-christians would be able to publicly say with their mouths "Jesus >>> is LORD." >>> >>> Observation: >>> >>> Non-christians have been invariably unable to publicly say with their >>> mouths that "Jesus is LORD." >> Observation: the conditional "publicly" nowhere appears in the >> verse. > > You again forget the context of the verse: The context of the verse is the lies of your religion. WE remain intent on not saying lies in public.
From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD on 19 Sep 2008 13:10
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3977c4a8a7cdbc64? <>< http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683? |