Prev: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: 6th validation of scientific proof that Jesus is LORD <><
Next: Free access 6 General Medicine Journals
From: Cary Kittrell on 19 Sep 2008 10:51
In article <m3lcq5-lf2.ln1(a)blaze.blaze.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail(a)com.mkbilbo> writes:
> Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > In article <7b2c2701-3ea0-416c-abea-0cc3f2c79216(a)26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love30(a)thetruth.com> writes:
> >> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Null hypothesis:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jesus is not LORD so that GOD's promise in 1 Corinthians 12:3 that
> >>>>>> "...no one can say, 'Jesus is LORD,' except by the Holy Spirit" would
> >>>>>> not be realized.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Prediction based on null hypothesis:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Non-christians would be able to publicly say with their mouths "Jesus
> >>>>>> is LORD."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Observation:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Non-christians have been invariably unable to publicly say with their
> >>>>>> mouths that "Jesus is LORD."
> >>>>> Datum: Rod has done exactly that.
> >>>> Rod no longer exists since his soul died after blaspheming against the
> >>>> Holy Spirit.
> >>> You remind me of a man carrying on a heated debate with a lampost,
> >>> all the time slapping at the bugs crawling underneath his skin.
> >> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> >> you to again unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly
> >> declare with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> >
> > ....aaaaand, the lamppost pulls ahead by virtue of its superior
> > logic...
>
> <snortle>


On second though, Chung may be laying a rhetorical trap for
the lamppost. You might think that he's given away too
much when he conceded that the lamppost had all the facts
on its side of the debate...but I'm guessing that the
lamppost is unprepared for Andy's "September Surprise",
to wit:

Discernment automatically transcends an
objective consideration of the facts.



-- cary
From: Cary Kittrell on 22 Sep 2008 15:24
In article <216lq5-nib.ln1(a)blaze.blaze.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail(a)com.mkbilbo> writes:
> Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > In article <d0fc09e7-c06f-4abc-987f-7856cdba50c7(a)34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love29(a)thetruth.com> writes:
> >> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3473dc0d15d056f7?
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.bio.paleontology/msg/ce00507c6b818582
> >> ... as your non-christian friends continue to sigh in
> >> disappointment :-)
> >
> > Who, for example:
>
> 1. Imaginary person 1
> 2. Imaginary person 2
> 3...
>
> Oh, you get the idea...


Oh, it's gotten even more delicious (in a strictly two-pounds-a-
day sort of way, of course). Names have been named, specifics
have been....been specified.

Sadly, you do not appear to have made the list of my
non-Christian friends bitterly disappointed over my
refusal to play Gong Show at Chung's behest.

I'd say you need to ask yourself: "What did I do
right?"


-- cary
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: 6th validation of scientific proof that Jesus is LORD <><
Next: Free access 6 General Medicine Journals