|
Prev: Pentagon is stalking Linda Gore.... or so she claims.... what else is new in Las Vegas??
Next: Flawed St. John's Wort Study on ADHD Failed to Use Active Form of Herbal Extract
From: Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. on 2 Aug 2008 08:36 Flapper Jones wrote: > Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2:33 am, Flapper Jones <Flap...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote: > >> > >>> You will not get and we have NEVER got a factual answer from Proby. > >> You'll never get the truth from Wholeflaffers... > > > > Proby (and his sock-puppets) CANNOT answer a simple question > > not can't. > won't. Same thing, won't because you can't. Simply put, Proby is a #1) liar - porven by Jan; #2) harasser of women - proven by Ilena and #3) a crack-pot proven by Linda. The jury finds Proby discredited, proven by being disbarred. Case dismissed.
From: Flapper Jones on 2 Aug 2008 14:37 Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote: > Same thing, won't because you can't. Nope. Not the same thing. There's enough proof been posted already. You've been shown to be Dr. Richard X. Frager, a liar. That's all the proof that's required. Verdict: Wholeflaffers = Liar Buh bye, Jerry! :-D
From: Flapper Jones on 2 Aug 2008 14:55 Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote: > The jury finds Proby discredited, proven > by being disbarred. Case dismissed. Get a script for haldol and start taking it immediately. You're way off your rocker.
From: Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. on 2 Aug 2008 22:51 Flapper Jones wrote: > Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote: > > Same thing, won't because you can't. > > Nope. Not the same thing. Nice try, but again false. What's the big deal about providing the dates of said e-mail responses? Even a disbarred lawyer, I mean liar would know the significance of providing details. Wait, you are both of them! Ha-ha. Question to Proby: why the sock-puppets?
From: art on 3 Aug 2008 07:35
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote: > What's the big deal about providing the > dates of said e-mail responses? Do your own homework. |