From: anon on
Dear "Ball of Fire":
Return advice:

1. Go have your burning balls treated by a urologist--they seem to be
driving you crazy.
2. Realize that the biggest insult on a health forum is giving false
information to sick people who need accurate information--try mustering some
indignation over that., and stop acting as a caped crusader on behalf of
this "Janice," who obviously has no clue what she is talking about.
3. Have the guts to admit when you're wrong--you obviously mistook me for
someone else, but don't have the decency or the character to admit your
mistake and ackowledge it.
4. Go see a mental-healthcare professional for you colossal anger-management
problem.
5. As the ancient Greeks used to say about flawed people giving advice to
others, "Physician, heal thyself."

"Grey Balls -0- Fire" <GB0F(a)jerrys.post.office.org> wrote in message
news:JWFdk.246004$fB7.145873(a)en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com...
> anon. <avWdna6hMdM13OvVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, said
>
>>First, what kind of loon adopts the monkiers "Balls of Fire?" That pretty
>>much tells you all you need to know about this guy.
>>
> oh rly !
> how quaint :)
>
>>I suggest that you get your facts--and identities--straight efore you
>>charge
>>off on one of your psychotic crusades--althought getting facts straight
>>for
>>a psychotic would, I recognize, be sort of a contradiction in terms. At
>>any
>>rate, you're clearly off you're rocker and need some help.
>
> fantastic from someone going postal - 4 follow-up-to in less than 20
> minutes
> is more typical of an IBS sufferer than any seriously ill fellow.
> i do understand you have little comprehension of the Usenet environment
> so all is fine :)
>
> in respect of your reponse I will keep my advice short and pointed,
> persuaded
> to do so by the words you have already read, kind words, IMO:
> [excerpt]
> Newsgroups: alt.support.crohns-colitis
> Subject: Re: My cure`
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 23:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
> <93ddc391-a905-4695-9a7a-2827288694d1(a)y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
>>___>I agree with dj. Based on your posts in this thread, you behave like
>>___>a Troll.
>>___>You insult people.
>>___>You complain if they write something you see as an insult.
>>___>You accuse people of defending a post even when they haven't.
>>___>You constantly twist what people say and feebly attempt to make them
>>___>look bad.
>>___>If someone raises a valid point (e.g. strictures) you ineffectively
>>___>try to change the discussion to make it look like an invalid point.
>>___>You accuse people of behaving badly even as you behave in the same
>>___>ways.
>>___>Trolls typically try baiting other users into an emotional response
>>___>and generally try to disrupt normal discussion. Your posts in this
>>___>thread fit that pattern.
>
> you can avoid being analyzed in the fashion of the above quote by:
>
> 1 (one):--- studying the software you are using and knowing its
> limitations.
>
> 2 (two):--- taking the time to understand how "attribute" & "angle
> bracket" do work
> in Usenet threaded postings.
> [one clue is here - http://preview.tinyurl.com/5p3494
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/259fb1e376e0c2ea?dmode=source
>
> 3 (three):--- always looking at the _full_headers_ belonging to the post
> you are
> keen to respond to acrimoniously. Your software may not have this
> function.
> Change-out your software.
>
> 4 (four):--- use the URLS provided within any post to establish you do
> indeed have
> the _complete_ message comprehended and attributed (in your head).
>
>
> those four simple little steps will lead you to a far more enjoyable
> experience of
> Usenet than you currently display, and pacify the frantic message of
> absolute nescience portrayed - by you.
>
> anything else, YMMV
>
> GBOF
>
> -
> [postscript]
> Interesting to note that for the Group <alt.support.crohns-colitis>
> there are installed a great many "top posted" threaded comments.
> Persons responding using that lazy method do nobody any favors
> as the reading of threads becomes very difficult indeed.
> Using the Group for research of information, to help a fellow sufferer,
> is then a complete waste of your time, and the original effort by some
> to string a conversation coherently (reading).
> Quote, trim and generally edit responses to keep the topic
> alive and relevant - are all Good Practice.
>
>