From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 28, 11:19 pm, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:685bb61f-0313-456a-ac96-d49a2118c49d(a)r14g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 28, 5:17 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 9:20 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > > Jan Drew wrote:
> > > > On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > > >> Mark Probert wrote:
> > > >>> On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > > >>>>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups..com...
> > > >>>>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > >>>>> Videotaping Acts
> > > >>>>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be
> > > >>>>> 'Hundreds
> > > >>>>> of Victims'
> > > >>>>> More at
> > > >>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > > >>>> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
> > > >>> There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten
> > > >>> apples,
> > > >>> they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good.
> > > >>> It is
> > > >>> a pure form of ad hominem.
> > > >>> This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who
> > > >>> search
> > > >>> high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
> > > >> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They
> > > >> can't
> > > >> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most
> > > >> people
> > > >> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that
> > > >> doesn't
> > > >> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us
> > > >> we're in
> > > >> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever
> > > >> pharma is
> > > >> owes me a lot of money).
>
> > > >> Jeff
>
> > > > The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> > > > Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> > > I wasn't even following the subject until I read the post to which I
> > > responded.
>
> > > > There was no personal attack. It is in the news that a
> > > > Pediatrician
> > > > Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> > > > So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.
>
> > > I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.
>
> > Well, you should have been responding to the subject, not anything
> > Mark posted.
>
> He can post about anything he wants. If you do not like it, do not
> read it.
>
> > Neither are you a dr. You already posted you no longer practice.
>
> So what? He still has his MD degree and he is legally, ethically and
> morally aloowed to call himself Doctor.
>
> You, OTOH, defend fArtie/Frager/Kolnicj/ who was never a doctor but
> impersonated one. That is a crime in most states.
> ========================================================
> " Felix Martin <fe...(a)aracnet.com> (employee of aracnet)wrote:
>
> It is a felony in the State of Oregon to represent yourself as a Doctor,
> an Engineer or a Lawyer. It is in our system agreement that aracnet will
> be only used for lawful purposes. We do not want to be liable or part of
> any deception. As far as I know there are several people in this State
> gathering information for a possible indictment against this person. I
> cannot comment further. This user lied in his application and that by
> itself is grounds enough for termination. He had his opportunity to
> present verifiable information. FYI he has
> been kicked off from other systems."

This was from an email from the Administrator of Aracnet, which was
fArtie/Frager/Kolnick/'s ISP for a while.

> More than likely it is one of the reasons he moved to Washington soon
> after.-

I do believe that Washington also makes it a felony.


From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 29, 1:09 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:29 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Jan Drew wrote:
> > > On Dec 26, 9:20 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > >> Jan Drew wrote:
>
> > <...>
>
> > >> I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.
>
> > > Well, you should have been responding to the subject, not anything
> > > Mark posted.
>
> > Wrong. The discussion in a thread is not limited to the subject.
>
> Only if you are a gang member.

Hi Jan. Considering how you are so insistent that the topic of a
thread must be strictly adhered to, could you explain just how my
family is relevant to any thread ever created in any of these
newsgroups?

Cue Jan to not answer this question.

From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 29, 1:15 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:40 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 28, 4:50 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 25, 9:17 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 25, 9:03 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > > > Videotaping Acts
> > > > > Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > > > of Victims'
>
> > > > > More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>
> > > Thanks for showing again you are dishonest.
>
> > > Learn to post correctly.
>
> > What are you yapping about?
>
> I am not yapping.  I post the truth.

Yes, you are yapping, bleating, braying and barking. (Love that
aliteration).

> http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>
>   >
>
> > > More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s
>
> Thanks again for proving you are not honest. Learn to post correctly.
> You do it on purpose.  Your links leads to nowhere.-

If you would bother to go up thread, you would see that I did not post
those URLs.

Now, go tell the person who did post them that they are not honest.

January 2, 2010 is fast approaching. There are storm clouds on your
horizon.

From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 29, 1:18 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:45 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 28, 4:58 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 26, 7:50 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
>
> > > > > >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > > > >>> Videotaping Acts
> > > > > >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > > > >>> of Victims'
> > > > > >>> More at
> > > > > >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > > > > >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > > > > > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > > > > > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good.. It is
> > > > > > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > > > > > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > > > > > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> > > > > GIve them a break.
>
> > > > Name the bone.
>
> > > > > The best they can do is personal attacks.
>
> > > > Agreed. That is what PeteyB is all about. No point in talking science
> > > > with him.
>
> > > This thread is not about PeterB, nor is he PeteyB
>
> > I will make it about whomever I please.
>
> You forgot again you posted Call me Mark "Diversion" Probert.
> That makes you a hypocrite.

I did not forget anything. I have you programmed to constantly remind
me.

>  Off topic deleted.

Jan deletes what she does not like.

January 2, 2010 is fast approaching. There are storm clouds on your
horizon.

From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 29, 1:22 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:47 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com>
>
> Time to shut up Mark S Probert.

There ya go again. Let me be perfectly clear, when you are 6 feet
under, I will not mention you.

> You diversions are off topic.
> You posted not a word about this terrible sexual molesting, and abuse.

I surely did. You just did not understand what I wrote.

> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> Videotaping Acts
> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> of Victims'
>
> More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...

Sorry, but that link does not go to the story you think it does. How
deceptive of you.

January 2, 2010 is fast approaching. There are storm clouds on your
horizon.