From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 28, 4:50 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 9:17 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 25, 9:03 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > Videotaping Acts
> > > Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > of Victims'
>
> > > More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>
> Thanks for showing again you are dishonest.
>
> Learn to post correctly.

What are you yapping about? You snipped whatever I said, and call me
dishonest? January 2 is fast approaching.

> More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...


From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 28, 4:58 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 7:50 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
> > > >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > >>> Videotaping Acts
> > > >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > >>> of Victims'
> > > >>> More at
> > > >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > > >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > > > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > > > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > > > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > > > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > > > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> > > GIve them a break.
>
> > Name the bone.
>
> > > The best they can do is personal attacks.
>
> > Agreed. That is what PeteyB is all about. No point in talking science
> > with him.
>
> This thread is not about PeterB, nor is he PeteyB

I will make it about whomever I please. You do it whenever you post
about me. If you do not like it, do not do it.

Simple.

January 2nd is fast approaching. Storm clouds on the horizon.


> - Show quoted text -

From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 28, 5:04 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 8:00 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 5:42 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > Mark Probert wrote:
> > > > > On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> > > > >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > >>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups..com...
>
> > > > >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > > >>> Videotaping Acts
> > > > >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > > >>> of Victims'
> > > > >>> More at
> > > > >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > > > >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > > > > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > > > > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > > > > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > > > > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > > > > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> > > > GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> > > > get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> > > > with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> > > > add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> > > > the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> > > > owes me a lot of money).
>
> > > > Jeff
>
> > > The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> > > Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> > > There was no personal attack. It is in the news that a Pediatrician
> > > Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> > > So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.-
>
> > He did not make a personal attack.
>
> *** people with normal minds***
>
> Is a personal attack.

No, itis a description of people who demonstrate normal thinking.
Unlike some others.

> Proving me 100% correct that the gang members lie for each other.
>
> You keep making even a bigger fool of yourself.-

Wrong.

January 2nd is fast approaching. Storm clouds on the horizon.

From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 28, 5:17 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 9:20 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jan Drew wrote:
> > > On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > >> Mark Probert wrote:
> > >>> On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> > >>>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> > >>>>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > >>>>> Videotaping Acts
> > >>>>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > >>>>> of Victims'
> > >>>>> More at
> > >>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > >>>> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
> > >>> There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > >>> they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > >>> a pure form of ad hominem.
> > >>> This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > >>> high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
> > >> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> > >> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> > >> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> > >> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> > >> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> > >> owes me a lot of money).
>
> > >> Jeff
>
> > > The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> > > Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> > I wasn't even following the subject until I read the post to which I
> > responded.
>
> > > There was no personal attack. It is in the news that a Pediatrician
> > > Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> > > So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.
>
> > I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.
>
> Well, you should have been responding to the subject, not anything
> Mark posted.

He can post about anything he wants. If you do not like it, do not
read it.

> Neither are you a dr.  You already posted you no longer practice.

So what? He still has his MD degree and he is legally, ethically and
morally aloowed to call himself Doctor.

You, OTOH, defend fArtie/Frager/Kolnicj/ who was never a doctor but
impersonated one. That is a crime in most states.

From: Peter B on
"Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:685bb61f-0313-456a-ac96-d49a2118c49d(a)r14g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 28, 5:17 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 9:20 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jan Drew wrote:
> > > On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > >> Mark Probert wrote:
> > >>> On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> > >>>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> > >>>>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > >>>>> Videotaping Acts
> > >>>>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be
> > >>>>> 'Hundreds
> > >>>>> of Victims'
> > >>>>> More at
> > >>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > >>>> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
> > >>> There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten
> > >>> apples,
> > >>> they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good.
> > >>> It is
> > >>> a pure form of ad hominem.
> > >>> This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who
> > >>> search
> > >>> high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
> > >> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They
> > >> can't
> > >> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most
> > >> people
> > >> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that
> > >> doesn't
> > >> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us
> > >> we're in
> > >> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever
> > >> pharma is
> > >> owes me a lot of money).
>
> > >> Jeff
>
> > > The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> > > Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> > I wasn't even following the subject until I read the post to which I
> > responded.
>
> > > There was no personal attack. It is in the news that a
> > > Pediatrician
> > > Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> > > So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.
>
> > I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.
>
> Well, you should have been responding to the subject, not anything
> Mark posted.

He can post about anything he wants. If you do not like it, do not
read it.

> Neither are you a dr. You already posted you no longer practice.

So what? He still has his MD degree and he is legally, ethically and
morally aloowed to call himself Doctor.

You, OTOH, defend fArtie/Frager/Kolnicj/ who was never a doctor but
impersonated one. That is a crime in most states.
========================================================
" Felix Martin <fe...(a)aracnet.com> (employee of aracnet)wrote:


It is a felony in the State of Oregon to represent yourself as a Doctor,
an Engineer or a Lawyer. It is in our system agreement that aracnet will
be only used for lawful purposes. We do not want to be liable or part of
any deception. As far as I know there are several people in this State
gathering information for a possible indictment against this person. I
cannot comment further. This user lied in his application and that by
itself is grounds enough for termination. He had his opportunity to
present verifiable information. FYI he has
been kicked off from other systems."

More than likely it is one of the reasons he moved to Washington soon
after.