From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 26, 7:50�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > >>> Videotaping Acts
> > >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > >>> of Victims'
> > >>> More at
> > >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> > GIve them a break.
>
> Name the bone.
>
> > The best they can do is personal attacks.
>
> Agreed. That is what PeteyB is all about. No point in talking science
> with him.

This thread is not about PeterB, nor is he PeteyB
>
> They can't

Neither is it about they it is about Pediatrician Accused of Sexually
Abusing Patients
Make a note of it, Mark "Diversion" Probert
From: Jan Drew on
Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com>

Proves he is indeed Mark "Diversion Probert.

Posting diversions and not the subject.

Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
Videotaping Acts
Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
of Victims'


More at http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 26, 8:00�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 5:42�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > > Mark Probert wrote:
> > > > On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> > > >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > >>> Videotaping Acts
> > > >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > >>> of Victims'
> > > >>> More at
> > > >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > > >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > > > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > > > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > > > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > > > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > > > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> > > GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> > > get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> > > with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> > > add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> > > the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> > > owes me a lot of money).
>
> > > Jeff
>
> > The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> > Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> > There was no personal attack. �It is in the news that a �Pediatrician
> > Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> > So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.-
>
> He did not make a personal attack.

*** people with normal minds***

Is a personal attack.

Proving me 100% correct that the gang members lie for each other.

You keep making even a bigger fool of yourself.


From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 26, 9:20�pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Jan Drew wrote:
> > On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> >> Mark Probert wrote:
> >>> On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> >>>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com....
> >>>>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> >>>>> Videotaping Acts
> >>>>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> >>>>> of Victims'
> >>>>> More at
> >>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> >>>> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
> >>> There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> >>> they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> >>> a pure form of ad hominem.
> >>> This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> >>> high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
> >> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> >> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> >> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> >> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> >> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> >> owes me a lot of money).
>
> >> Jeff
>
> > The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> > Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> I wasn't even following the subject until I read the post to which I
> responded.
>
> > There was no personal attack. �It is in the news that a �Pediatrician
> > Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> > So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.
>
> I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.

Well, you should have been responding to the subject, not anything
Mark posted.

Neither are you a dr. You already posted you no longer practice.

Real one on HealthFraud list: Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz, M.D.
jeff...(a)juno.com
[2007] "Robert Watson" kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com
Jeff Utz jtest-u...(a)juno.com
Jeff Utz, M.D. jeff...(a)juno.com
Jeffrey P. Utz, M.D. jeff...(a)softhome.net Hence "Putz"
http://www.msu.edu/~utz/ u...(a)pilot.msu.edu
Jeffrey Peter, M.D. kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com
Wyle E. Coyote wyle_e_coyot...(a)hotmail.com
Jeff Utz kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com (Jan 2003)
Jeff jef...(a)pacbell.net
Jeff j...(a)hotmail.com (2007)
From: dr_jeff on
Jan Drew wrote:
> On Dec 26, 9:20�pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>> Jan Drew wrote:

<...>

>> I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.
>
> Well, you should have been responding to the subject, not anything
> Mark posted.

Wrong. The discussion in a thread is not limited to the subject.

> Neither are you a dr. You already posted you no longer practice.

So. I am entitled to use the title until I die. And, then, it will be
proper to refer to me as the late Dr. Utz.


<garbage deleted>

Jeff