From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 26, 5:42 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark Probert wrote:
> > > On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> > >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > >>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com....
>
> > >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > >>> Videotaping Acts
> > >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > >>> of Victims'
> > >>> More at
> > >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
> > >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> > GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> > get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> > with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> > add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> > the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> > owes me a lot of money).
>
> > Jeff
>
> The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> Guess he thinks it is OK.
>
> There was no personal attack.  It is in the news that a  Pediatrician
> Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.-

He did not make a personal attack.
From: dr_jeff on
Jan Drew wrote:
> On Dec 26, 9:43�am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>> Mark Probert wrote:
>>> On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
>>>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
>>>>> Videotaping Acts
>>>>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
>>>>> of Victims'
>>>>> More at
>>>>> http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>>>> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>>> There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
>>> they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
>>> a pure form of ad hominem.
>>> This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
>>> high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
>> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
>> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
>> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
>> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
>> owes me a lot of money).
>>
>> Jeff
>
> The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
> Guess he thinks it is OK.

I wasn't even following the subject until I read the post to which I
responded.

> There was no personal attack. It is in the news that a Pediatrician
> Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.
>
> So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.

I was commenting on Mark's comments about ad hominem.

I didn't post a personal attack. Rather, I was commenting on their way
of arguing.

Jeff
From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 27, 9:05�pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:

snip profanity and reported.


From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 25, 9:17�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 9:03�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > Videotaping Acts
> > Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > of Victims'
>
> > More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...

Thanks for showing again you are dishonest.

Learn to post correctly.

More at http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...

From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 26, 9:43�am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com....
>
> >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> >>> Videotaping Acts
> >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> >>> of Victims'
> >>> More at
> >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s....
> >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> owes me a lot of money).
>
> Jeff

Not dr. Thanks for showing your personal attack.

***people with normal minds***

Is a personal attack, hypocrite, from a liar who still posts as a dr,