From: dr_jeff on
Mark Probert wrote:
> On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
>>> Videotaping Acts
>>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
>>> of Victims'
>>> More at
>>> http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.

GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
owes me a lot of money).

Jeff
From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 25, 9:17�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 9:03�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > Videotaping Acts
> > Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > of Victims'
>
> > More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>
> Should we discuss Patrick Bolen's client, Stuie Suster? You support
> Bolen when you post his articles.

No, sad that you seem to think is is OK for a pediatican to sexually
abuse his patients.

And, you forgot you posted:
Call me Mark "Diversion" Probert.
Proving you are a hyopcrite.
From: Jan Drew on
On Dec 26, 9:43�am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com....
>
> >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> >>> Videotaping Acts
> >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> >>> of Victims'
> >>> More at
> >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s....
> >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> GIve them a break. The best they can do is personal attacks. They can't
> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> owes me a lot of money).
>
> Jeff

The Not dr posted nothing about the subject.
Guess he thinks it is OK.

There was no personal attack. It is in the news that a Pediatrician
Accused of Sexually Abusing Patients.

So you just posted a personal attack, hypocrite.

From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 26, 9:43 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 1:16 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:dc6e4ef4-fb6f-4951-b56c-4af4b909365f(a)m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com....
>
> >>> Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> >>> Videotaping Acts
> >>> Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> >>> of Victims'
> >>> More at
> >>>http://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s....
> >> Why are you so infatuated with this kind of stuff?
>
> > There are those who "think" that by highlighting the rotten apples,
> > they can taint the barrel and show how real medicine is no good. It is
> > a pure form of ad hominem.
>
> > This is a common tactic of the alties. There are others who search
> > high and low (mainly low) for this kind of article.
>
> GIve them a break.

Name the bone.

> The best they can do is personal attacks.

Agreed. That is what PeteyB is all about. No point in talking science
with him.

They can't
> get the science right (they say chemotherapy doesn't help most people
> with cancer, yet, most people with cancer are cured - gee that doesn't
> add up in people with normal minds). All they can do is tell us we're in
> the 'gang' and are pharmashills (if I am a shill, but whoever pharma is
> owes me a lot of money).

Agreed.

If I get a check from BigPhamra, I'll donate 100% to the Make-A-Wish
Foundation.



From: Mark Probert on
On Dec 26, 5:38 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 9:17 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 25, 9:03 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > Pediatrician Earl Bradley Accused of Raping Child Patients,
> > > Videotaping Acts
> > > Delaware State Attorney General's Office Says There May Be 'Hundreds
> > > of Victims'
>
> > > More athttp://abcnews.go.com/WN/delaware-pediatrician-earl-bradley-accused-s...
>
> > Should we discuss Patrick Bolen's client, Stuie Suster? You support
> > Bolen when you post his articles.
>
> No,

Why not? Because you cannot handle it? Yes, that is it.

sad that you seem to think is is OK for a pediatican to sexually
> abuse his patients.

Actually, no, I do not. Nothing I posted could lead an intelligent
person to think so.

Several years ago there was one in my community, and a friend of mine
was thinking of merging practices in view of retirement for his
declining health problems.

I had heard some rumors, and relayed them to my friend. He had some
"try-out days" and with the knowledge I imparted, he kept a wary eye.
He concluded that there was a problem, and filed a complaint with the
state. This resulted in an immediate license suspension that lead to
people coming forward to provide proof, and the swine ball lost his
license.

>
> And, you forgot you posted:
> Call me Mark "Diversion" Probert.
> Proving you are a hyopcrite.

No, you are. You failed to condemn Stuie the Groper.