From: Felonious Monk on
In article <87j3g3pf568glog5iipgsigt53s4d8ie4b(a)4ax.com>,
<"ack(a)me.org"<123(a)xyz.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:55:53 -0700, Hedge Hog <not(a)this.address>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <9rt8f39kqs6a4u5qo0k4cg3bin5tld5736(a)4ax.com>, <ack(a)me.org>
> >wrote:
>
> >> because it's dope
> >>
> >>
> >
> >the question is about Oxytocin, not Oxycontin.
> >
> >http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/hypopit/oxytocin.
> >html
>
> well, no. I was responding to the post that used the exact word
> oxycontin
>
> besides, with such word similarity, you can wonder if there is also
> chemical similarity. There is.
>
> For chattiness, alcohol is well known. Or for less common, how about
> nootropics? I got chatty the one time I tried paracetam.

none the less, the original poster did not enquire about Ocycontin, he
asked about Oxytocin. I find it best to answer the question asked by
the thread starter rather than reply to a reply by someone who can't
read.
From: sun5 on
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:42:39 -0800, Felonious Monk
<not(a)this_address.org> wrote:

>In article <87j3g3pf568glog5iipgsigt53s4d8ie4b(a)4ax.com>,
><"ack(a)me.org"<123(a)xyz.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:55:53 -0700, Hedge Hog <not(a)this.address>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <9rt8f39kqs6a4u5qo0k4cg3bin5tld5736(a)4ax.com>, <ack(a)me.org>
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >> because it's dope
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >the question is about Oxytocin, not Oxycontin.
>> >
>> >http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/hypopit/oxytocin.
>> >html
>>
>> well, no. I was responding to the post that used the exact word
>> oxycontin
>>
>> besides, with such word similarity, you can wonder if there is also
>> chemical similarity. There is.
>>
>> For chattiness, alcohol is well known. Or for less common, how about
>> nootropics? I got chatty the one time I tried paracetam.
>
>none the less, the original poster did not enquire about Ocycontin, he
>asked about Oxytocin. I find it best to answer the question asked by
>the thread starter rather than reply to a reply by someone who can't
>read.

why do you keep insisting that I can't read?

well, nice to see you are back and posting. Keep going.